🦅🇺🇸 WOKE’S BANE 🇺🇸🦅

Hello everyone. It is good to see all of you after my Hiatus from X. after coming back, I noticed a trend that I believe needs adjustment, and this is what this post is about. First, it is important for us to ask the simple question, what are our reasons for being here? Mine's straightforward: Amplify ideas that build momentum for us, connect with our crowd, and undercut the opposition's outrage machine. If that's also you, hear me out. I've engaged in my fair share of battles with these people, if you can call it that lol, but i was thinking one sharp take-down could flip the script. It doesn't. It fuels the fire. Scrolling X over morning coffee, you spot it: A DNC paid sellout drops a half-baked hit on taxes or borders. Instinct screams "respond". But those are clickbait traps, wired for provocation. Reply, and you tell the algo: "This is gold—spread it." Their spin invades neutral feeds, undecided eyes, even ours. Your point? Drowned in a troll-filled reply abyss. OP ignores, post surges 10K impressions, my feed sours with more bait. It hollows you,and wastes your time, while helping them. Systemically, it amps their post by a large margin, check the graph below to see the impact of a reply compared to a like or even a share(from an analysis of X's open source code on Github). so what to do, you may ask, here's some of the changes that I have been personally trying to implement, or plan on doing so in the future: 1- Only reply to original posts from conservatives, this will boost our message, and you will still be able to express your POV. 2-make your own original content- while I know the algo hasn't been kind, this will always be a net positive compared to boosting their content, even if you only get 5 views. 3-clean your feed, mute the accounts that constantly rage bait, also click on the 3 dots on their post and let the algo know that you are not interested. 4- if you must reply to them, I suggest you take a screenshot to their post and make your own post about it. this will not help them one bit, all while being able to voice your opinion. while I am here, I want to recognize a few people who always fight the good fight, if you don't have these good folks, take a look at their account. @lisa_maga_2025 @straitupjesus23 @CoffeeNGrit @venblackburns github.com/twitter/the-al…

@MagaKnuckless @paleochristcon Why so fragile ?

@paleochristcon Keep crashing out for Jay Dyer like a retard 🤣🤣

Content lawfare WILL NOT be tolerated. Sent a grand. Good luck kid. gofundme.com/f/godlogic-vs-…

@melmurrey Bingo

If words flow from your lips telling someone they are a conduit and they need to learn to allow demons to pass through them, you need to keep your sugar-sweet and demonically afflicted lips shut and pray for repentance. That is NOT God you are hearing.

@fegelfly @BruceSaiFun 🤣 🤣 this ⬆️

@2A_Warrior @BruceSaiFun David Wood vis-a-vis Muslims is like that cheap but decent enough brand you buy off the market whenever your slightly more expensive but quality brand is out of stock. IOW - 'acceptable.'

Shekels Woodstein claims to know logic and philosophy, but demonstrates here why he get pwned and destroyed by Wilson, which is why he has now decided to engage on a jihad against the EO, which only lead to his further humiliation: x.com/Acts17David/st… Since he is become just as illiterate as the prophet of Islam he decries, let me educate Debotah Woodstein by citing the Bible for him. This is from my YT post where I addressed Woodstein. One thing I do want to say, since I was told this by the sister who sent me this clip, that he played clips of me where I used to praise him and where I then changed my mind later. This shouldn't be shocking since people's opinions will change due to a change in people and circumstances. For instance, Paul praised Demas at the beginning of his ministry: Colossians 4:14 14 Luke, the beloved physician, sends you his greetings, and also Demas. Philemon 24 24 as do Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, Luke, my fellow workers. Only to then condemn him in his last letter for abandoning him: 2 Timothy 4:10-11 10 for Demas, having loved this present age, has deserted me and gone to Thessalonica; Crescens has gone to Galatia, Titus to Dalmatia. 11 Only Luke is with me. Pick up Mark and bring him with you, for he is useful to me for service. I always felt David was the General Patton of apologetics but he has changed over the years in a manner that is not good or productive. He is getting worse by the day since he surrounds himself with yes man who do not love him enough to hold him accountable. Now if Shekels spent half the time studying the Holy Bible and Church History, which he spends on his jihad against folks that call him out and humiliate him, maybe he wouldn't be this stupid and illiterate.

Interesting . Which part he slammed Alex in ? Mind you in a debate where an atheist is genuinely interested in learning and where the Bible was the main source used by both ? Where David couldn’t articulate such an easy point to articulate and such an essential point to Christianity - the divinity of Jesus … To me it was the part where David answered to the question of why Jesus prayed to god if he’s god by saying that because Jesus is not an atheist. Thank God Avery was there and helped David save face with his perfectly articulated question . And yeah why would David need to know about the first 1500 years of the church ? The church did not really start till the 1500s , right ? As far as the other guy , Jay is issuing an open challenge every day and opening spaces , I’ve yet to see your dude come debate

@2A_Warrior @BruceSaiFun He slammed Alex and he admitted he doesn't know anything about orthodoxy to debate Jay, why won't Jay debate Anthony Rogers though who knows about orthodoxy ?

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun Anyway , time to sleep , remember it’s not too late to ask for forgiveness and leave the ways of Satan. Goodnight

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun Ah yeah , “they sin so it’s ok for you to do the same “- Satan . 🤣 🤣.

He wrecked Shekels Rapist Wood, ending his career. It was that bad.

You couldn’t continue defending your idol blindly , so instead you dodged to another topic then claimed you never defended him , while defending him . As far as Sam. Idk , I see this are a reply to “preach brother “ yet again, you seem to have lost it 🤣 at this point it’s a comedy show with you

I most certainly did bring forth some accusatory points about pre-conversion sins and post-conversion sins AFTER your accusations - which btw are forgivable because of the grace of God shown through the sacrifice of Jesus. Perhaps you should go help Scam in another part of this thread. He is manifesting wildly over his own logic or lack there-of.

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun Which is ironic , you accuse him of all that , yet you are right there yourself . Projection much ?

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun From the outside he seems to be just matching your energy. 🤣 🤣

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun Ah the accuser . As you spent half the conversation playing that role even though it had nothing to do with the conversation. Why would you go out of your way to write so many accusations when it is unrelated ? They always expose themselves these little demons don’t they ?

@2A_Warrior @BruceSaiFun Sure I get it. 1 Corinthians 15. Now, are you a believer? If so, shall we ask the Lord to lay out all of your pre-conversion sins? Wood laid out before all some harsh ones out that you continue to damn him for. You know who likes that sort of stuff? This guy. 👇

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun You compared someone who the gospel said he became a believer in Jesus which is as true as it gets , to someone who claimed he became a believer in Jesus according to his own word , so I asked you to justify the comparison and you failed to do so . You get it now ?

@2A_Warrior @BruceSaiFun I compared someone who became a believer in Jesus to someone who became a believer in Jesus. You are the one that brought pre-conversion sin back up like the accuser of the brethren so I stress tested your droolery and you failed. Did you notice that? I noticed that.

Lying yet again , you had your chance to clarify that 12 comments ago yet you only did that when you realized you hit dead ends on defending him. So instead you dodged and changed topics and lied about what you came here to do in the first place . I asked YOU to address David’s grift and show me otherwise , what was your response ? Attacking another person, the burden of proof was on you , and YOU dodged to Sam. But of course you’d try to gaslight there , luckily it’s all there in writing.

Not once did I defend Wood that brought your accusation of that very thing. Did you notice that? I noticed that. 🤭 Did you notice that you did not address your insight into your accusations of Wood's grifting nature? I noticed that. If you are fair in your concerns, and as you clearly said, you call out Sam when you think he is wrong then surely you can address if he is a grifter as you say of Wood. Again, this is testing to see if your scales are balanced. Since I already made that clear, I feel you may be ducking the issue of your ability or willingness to judge fairly. 😘

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun Still not talking about Sam Here . Why do you keep dodging the original topic ? You think if you try hard enough and go in enough circle it’ll make things better for you ?

@2A_Warrior @BruceSaiFun But wouldn't that be grifting by seeking attention and attacking others in a dishonest manner for likes on X and attempting to drive people to his youtube?🤔

@FetorM @BruceSaiFun Don’t need to address that . I never said Sam doesn’t make mistakes and never defended his person . You dodging to Sam instead of staying on topic tells it all about your inability to keep up .

@2A_Warrior @BruceSaiFun I forgot to add that you did not address Sam's antisemitic intoned attacks on Wood even though Sam knows Wood does not hold to Christian Zionism.

Yet again you are going to irrelevant topics to the conversation and are unable to stay on the subject . Sam’s good or bad actions have 0 influence on our conversation. Not once did I defend his person , not once did I say he doesn’t make mistakes. So I get that you feel that you’re over your head and it would be embarrassing for you to actually directly address the topic of David, but like I said earlier, I’m not here to play these games with you . We are discussing David here and not Sam , and whether Sam is a grifter or not , is irrelevant to the topic.

Please bear with me even though I am so sorely ill equipped. I am glad you are fair enough to defend David on what you think is good. You did not address your support or condemnation of Sams brutal name calling and often toward those who seem to be believers but disagree on certain doctrines. You did not address the issue with Sam painting Israel and the IDF with a wide and intellectually dishonest brush regarding soldier crimes that he seems to relish in pointing out. As for salvation of the thief or anyone, that is between Jesus and the person. Even Sam can grasp that occasionally when his own hateful emotions are not involved. You, on the other hand, seem a bit quicker to be an accuser of the brethren. You judge Wood as a rapist for his pre-conversion past and quite vigorously while you did seem a bit more tepid in judging Sam's marital abuse post-conversion. I find that a little bit interesting. I brought up the question about others being grifters so I could assess the balance and consistency you use. Is Avery a grifter as judged by Dyer and the dawahs? If you are endowed with the gift of discernment to the point of seeing into the hearts of men and have ironclad proof of Wood being a grifter. Present it. If you have ironclad proof that Sam is not a grifter. Present it.😘

Paul also says you can have all the faith in the world but no love and that faith would mean nothing, he also says faith without works is dead . Now with that in mind , to answer your question , it’s important to see who this was addressing. James was addressing the Jews in that specific chapter , Paul was addressing the gentiles, and considering where they were, they needed different messages . The Jews needed more than “we’re the chosen people we will be saved just by believing”, they needed to understand that they still need to follow Jesus instructions , and the gentiles of these days needed to move in the opposite direction, as they did not have a developed sense of faith like the Jews did, and thought they could work their way to salvation.

@CatholicDrip___ Whether people are quoting Paul’s passage on faith and works (saved by faith and not by works) or James’ passage (I will show you my faith by my works), they rarely answer when I ask them how these passages make sense together. What is your answer?

@CatholicDrip___ We need to use the right terms. It’s dead faith vs living faith .

First if that was the case your make that clear when I clearly stated it there. If you search my name and David’s you’d see I have defended his ideas in certain occasions. He does well against Muslims for the most part and I have no issue defending his IDEAS . (And call out the hypocrisy of Muslims when they call him names while following a 54 years old prophet who married a 6 years old ) . For the thief that’s you again grasping for straws , there are exceptions out there and that one happened to repent and Jesus knew it was genuine , the gospels tells us Jesus in return saved him , prove that’s the case with David. For your second paragraph , whether the others are grifting or not is irrelevant on the case of David , so don’t play that game with me. Overall you seem ill prepared and you continue to prove my point that you are willing to go to great lengths to defend the person of David woods.

1st thing, look back. I didn't defend David. I made fun of Sham for his incessant vendetta against Wood. He has done the same with many who partnered with him, helped him in the past etc.. Do you defend David's ideas? My bad regarding the thief on the cross by calling him murderer but yes, that one directly addressed by Jesus. Was he just doing his duty? How can you prove any of these people are not grifting? Can you prove Scam is not grifting? He uses Jesus and the scripture to justify calling people whores, sons of whores, dogs, stupid bastard etc.. You defend that idea? He uses antisemitic names like "Shekels Wood" "Deborah Woodstein" even though he knows Wood does not hold to Christian Zionism. He uses misdeeds of IDF soldier (who were punished for those misdeed) to claim Israel's policy is to attack Christians in Lebanon. That's a great idea, isn't it?