Catholic Drip 💧

Why do Protestants use a 66 book Bible you ask…..? Well, there was this debate and it wasn’t going to well for Mr. Luther…..and……💧

@realDrTT I know, the Mormons I usually leave alone because they are such great people. But follow the thread, they came at Peter first Should I stay quiet? Maybe I should

Hey @CatholicDrip___! I really like your memes and the aesthetic that you promote. We Catholics have so much truth and beauty — the Blessed Sacrament, awesome architecture, beautiful hymns, chants, music, and prayers and I love that you highlight that! So, please don't take this the wrong way, but I think we have so much to offer that we don't need to tear the faith of others down! You've got an eye for style, and we could use more people like you showing others how wonderful Catholicism is rather than dissing other beliefs! God bless you, bro (or bro-ette).

Why, so Joseph Smith could plagiarize someone else’s work again 💧

@polarisraven13 Show me a 66 book prior to Martin Lunatic, the one who wanted to burn synagogues.

@CatholicDrip___ You cannot disprove it... To do so would mean to disprove the 66 canonical books, and if you're going to do that then your faith is less than that of a devil James 2:19 19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

SOLA SCRIPTURA Hebrews 9:27-28 27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: 28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation. Ecclesiastes 9:1-5

@polarisraven13 Keep reading James He’ll talk about works and faith alone. Don’t let Protestants con you

@ShawnieTwoZero I know. We did that!

@CatholicDrip___ Catholic means universal because we conquer the UNIVERSE!

The teachings of the Catholic Church passed down by the apostles 💧 Or…… Me and my own dumbass opinion?

@ShawnieTwoZero I know.

@ShawnieTwoZero Lowercase c, Lmaoo 😂😂😂

@CatholicDrip___ Yes, but lowercase C catholic

@thelutherpress You talk about me using rudeness in Jesus name but you play Judge like your God saying Catholics aren’t saved You’re whole church is based off Catholic

@CatholicDrip___ It was nagging my conscience and I wanted to make it right. That's all.

@thelutherpress I never once said Lutherans aren’t saved. I believe and hope many will. You’re a fraud

@thelutherpress You’re a fraud and a coward. You tell me not to cause division and here you are saying people who convert to Catholics may not be saved You call yourself Lutherpress. Stop worshiping your daddy Luther who wanted to burn down Jews and take their property. Your a coward

@CatholicDrip___ @CatholicDrip___ You don't post the same arguments every day. I'm sorry I said that.

@IFB1611KJV On whose authority does he have to downgrade it ?

Nice meme, but it leaves out the inconvenient facts. Luther didn’t remove the Apocrypha—his 1534 Bible still printed it in a separate section. The debate at Leipzig didn’t create a new canon; it exposed an existing disagreement over whether books like 2 Maccabees were inspired. More importantly, Rome didn’t dogmatically canonize the Apocrypha until the Council of Trent in 1546—after the Reformation had begun. The issue isn’t who won a debate; it’s whether God inspired those books. The Jews, who were entrusted with the Old Testament (Rom. 3:1–2), did not receive them as Scripture, Jesus affirmed the Hebrew canon (Luke 24:44), and neither He nor the apostles ever cited the Apocrypha as Scripture.

Why do Protestants use a 66 book Bible you ask…..? Well, there was this debate and it wasn’t going to well for Mr. Luther…..and……💧

@hvworlton @ScubaDocJMP Follow the thread. But this is fun

@CatholicDrip___ @ScubaDocJMP Huh. And all I did was say when you can produce the stone tablets with the 10 Commandments, then we'll talk about the plates. And now there's people spreading false information... AGAIN. So in my mind, you started it.

@hvworlton @BeeW1736886 Why is he a profit? Because he said so ?

@BeeW1736886 @CatholicDrip___ Well, one was a prophet.l, who translated through the power of God. And the others were translating via the knowledge they had as men.

@JamesDitto12 So go have 76 books But there was no 66 None zip Nada Zero prior to Martin Lunatic Your book is short

Explain why the Western Church with 220+ popes for 1200 years kept the Prologus Galeatus in the front of every official Vulgate until Trent, if they believed it was false? Seems a strange way to "guard the deposit of faith" by directing the readers to know they are "not in the canon". Your Clementine Vulgate had 76 books. You're sure you want to just count the books between the covers? You had to label 3 & 4 Esdras and Prayer of Manessah as non-canonical, just like the Prologus did for 1200 years.

@TradReform Just show me a 66 book prior to Luther and I’ll agree with you Oops Can’t be found

@CatholicDrip___ We use a 66 book canon because the early church recognized a 66 book canon.

@JamesDitto12 That’s a preface Stop worshipping Jermone He submitted to the pope He didn’t have the ego of you

@CatholicDrip___ Lol. Your Prologus Galeatus makes 66 books. Just like your Clementine Vulgate didn't make a 76 book canon.

And it’s a lie “All your Bibles for 1200 years called them ‘not in the canon’” — False. Many medieval Bibles included prologues influenced by Jerome expressing reservations, but the books were still copied in the Bible, read in the liturgy, and treated as Scripture in much of the Church. That is not the same as “all Bibles called them non-canonical.” * Johann Eck admitted 2 Maccabees was not canonical — Misleading. During the Leipzig Debate, the dispute was primarily with Luther, who argued that 2 Maccabees could not establish doctrine because it was outside the canon. Modern summaries of the debate attribute that claim to Luther, not as a settled admission by Eck. * “The canon was fluctuating among theologians until Trent.” — Partly true. Some theologians (e.g., Jerome, Cajetan) questioned the deuterocanonical books, while others (Augustine and many councils) accepted them. There was theological discussion, but that does not mean the Church had no tradition. Trent settled the issue dogmatically in response to the Reformation. * “Trent ignored Rome (382).” — Misleading. Trent did not need to cite every earlier council. It reaffirmed the canon received in the Church’s tradition, including the lists found at Rome, Hippo, Carthage, and Florence.

Lol All your Bibles for 1200 years called them "not in the canon". The Vulgate, Glossa Ordinaria, Complutensian, Gutenberg, Malermi, etc, all said they were "not in the canon", it wasn't the Mentelin Bible alone that said that. Johan Eck admitted 2 Maccabees was not canonical. While debating the topic of Purgatory, the Papal "champion" Johan Eck admitted that 2 Maccabees 12:46 was not among the canonical books for the establishment of dogma. Eck made no mention of the Council of Rome, the "Damasine List," or the Council of Florence (1442) at all, let alone as binding authorities. His admission proves that even the Papacy's top theologians did not consider previous lists authoritative or binding for the establishment of doctrine. He relied on custom because he had no decree or canon law to cite. Acta et Scripta publice exhibita in Academia Lipsiensi ad disputationem inter Eckium et Lutherum (1519). Specifically, see the session on July 7-8, 1519, regarding Purgatory and the authority of the Maccabees. Contextual Confirmation: Hubert Jedin, A History of the Council of Trent, Vol. 1 (1957). Jedin (the preeminent Catholic historian on the subject) admited that the state of the canon was "fluctuating" and unsettled among theologians until the 1546 decree. There is a reason the Council of Trent didn't mention 382 Council of Rome.

@ChristySimm23 @Froggoesribbit1 You’ve proven nothing though

@Froggoesribbit1 @CatholicDrip___ There it is! Total surrender! You got completely obliterated on the Council of Rome, you flunked 13th-century history, you got trapped using your own double standard on Cyril, you exposed your ignorance of basic Greek, so now you’re throwing a tantrum & mentioning "cookies." 🤣

Denial of Mary’s Virginity exposes how far some Protestants have drifted 🚣‍♀️ They trust the Reformers for Sola Fide but disagree with them on Mary 🤔 The inconsistencies are endless 💧