REDIC

it's barron trump's economy, we're just trading in it

@Shilllin absolutely. TA should be there just to solidify your thesis or bias

I’ve never seen anyone get seriously rich just by following lines on a chart or obsessing over technical indicators. The traders who actually make it big seem to have a feel for the market They can read sentiment, spot shifts early, & act on instinct rather than just patterns.

@_10delta_ can we get some ZIRP again please?

Twitter hasn’t gotten worse. Twitter is a real-time readout of aggregate socieconomic conditions. ZIRP subsidized the illusion that everyone was winning. But the optimism wasn’t real, it was financial alchemy. Reaching its zenith in late 2021. Remove the excess liquidity & the mask starts to come off. Scarcity resurfaces. The zero-sum reality that easy money was hiding reasserts itself. The machine is complaining.

@nrepesh @machibigbrother its not a failure of anything, just a guy who made all his money scamming giving it back trying games of skill

$44M → - $33M isn’t a market failure. It’s a discipline failure. What likely went wrong with @machibigbrother bro? – Oversized positions – High leverage stacking – No strict stop discipline – Letting losses run instead of cutting early One wrong move doesn’t wipe you. A system without guardrails does. This problem can be solved with a product? That doesn’t try to “predict” the market better rather it protects you from yourself (from being emotional 😛) Here’s how it would’ve handled this: • Position sizing control → No going all-in or overexposed on a single trade • Strategy enforcement → Risk is predefined before you even enter • Risk-reward discipline → Trades only execute when the math makes sense • Candle position filter → No chasing tops, no panic entries at extremes • Automatic invalidation → If the setup breaks, you’re out no emotions involved So instead of 335 liquidations… 😬 You’d get: – Smaller losses – Controlled exposure – And most importantly… survival Because in trading, you don’t lose by being wrong. You lose by staying wrong too long.

@0xMerp probably more like $1.50

Hype going to $100 would be extremely good for LIT because then it might go to $2

i've been monitoring the situation pretty hard the last week or two and i need a cigarette

no way they let people say stuff like this and get away with it

@CL207 @fintechfrank why do you think so? From what I understand a lot of the current system would need to be re-worked. Do you think there's not enough incentive for them to go through the effort?

@fintechfrank they probably wont do perp contracts at all

they're not going to enable 40x leverage my brother in christ

60k looking good here

@LSDinmycoffee @notthreadguy this conflict in iran has shown it's not fully that easy

@notthreadguy if you're bearish because of geopolitics, just short shit why make it complicated

so literally nothing is a hedge against geopolitical chaos?

@TaikiMaeda2 pretty simple trade to me - AI will be the dominant narrative for next cycle and it is the only viable bid in the entire space to express that right now

can someone $TAO pill me

@insomniacxbt a few green daily's and people lose their minds

I have seen a few top signals today. Pls stop.

if we dont get any hawkish surprised at FOMC tomorrow we're set to run much higher

@trade_iv sell it and use that money to run it back

@fejau_inc getting trolled for being good at your job is pretty hilarious

I don’t know how much clearer I could have been in the latest roundup. 1) the price of oil doubled in a week and the Hormuz closure is 100x works for European and Asian markets. Therefore as long as it continues I expect weakness in their currencies and economy 2) vs the US who is largely energy independent and the global reserve currency so when global strain hits people fly into USD. That plus energy independence makes me think US will fare better than most and so the currency will hold up the best. 3) I don’t platform anyone and look to showcase a diversity of opinions and when I’m interviewing I try to steer clear of interjecting my own personal opinions. I’m there to seek truth. In the roundups I will be more a participant that provides my opinion. So YES I changed my mind on a dime because the facts changed on a dime. It would be anchoring bias to prior views and intellectually inconsistent if I stayed with my previous view just to not change my mind. That’s absurd. This is trading, not politics. Changing your mind is a GOOD thing if the facts change. I continue to see people get criticized for changing their views quickly in markets. That makes no sense to me. I’m proud of my ability to flip on a whim and not hold any bias. Thanks

how long can Saylor keep ripping $1B+ into BTC each week? I think you just stay long biased until we see he's slowed down

@LSDinmycoffee risk asset no matter how hard everyone wishes it wasn't

feels bad for $BTC when you realize it's basically a weaker version of $ARKK and yes it also suggests $ARKK could puke soon

@outpxce HYPE still pretty strong but big spot here

Interestingly enough, the first wave of alt winners are now glaringly weak. If I was a betting man, think there's a good chance BTC swipes those wick lows at 60k once more

Travis Kalanick: word slop about a golden age ushered in by robotic automation CT: *drops to knees*

@chiefingza yeah it's gross how genius it is

its just so fkn gross