333MsOratorical

13K posts

333MsOratorical banner
333MsOratorical

333MsOratorical

@333MsOratorical

[email protected]

Katılım Temmuz 2024
2.4K Takip Edilen43 Takipçiler
333MsOratorical retweetledi
Yegor
Yegor@yegormethod·
Honestly should not be sharing this and most of my clients would kill me for posting it publicly I run a content method that has done hundreds of millions of views across X accounts in the last 14 months. NONE of it has anything to do with the leaked X algorithm It comes down to one variable 99% of people on this app have never been told… Here's the actual rule… X "leaked" their source code last week and every operator with 80k+ followers is currently publishing 9 tweet threads explaining it. Slop scores. Banger detectors. In-network boosts. Decay functions. Shadowban labels. "Stop posting your AI dragon videos." Read 3 of these threads and you've read all of them. The conclusion they all reach is the exact same conclusion: Post quality content. Don't be AI slop. Don't bait. Don't post 12 times a day. Be in-network. Avoid NSFW labels That's the rule that has run every social platform since myspace launched in 2003. Literally nothing changed about how X works. The same operators who couldn't write a viral tweet last month are now selling you a 9 tweet thread explaining why they can't write one Funniest part of the whole thing is that the algorithm doesn't do what they think it does The algo isn't an opponent. It's not a math problem to outsmart. It's a thermometer. Sits in the corner of every post measuring one thing. Did a real human stay on this or did he scroll Every "leaked signal" in that code is the thermometer's read-out. The thermometer doesn't make the fire. You make the fire. The thermometer just measures it Now here's where this gets fucking saucy I'll probably regret writing the rest of this out in the open but whatever There's exactly one variable that decides whether a post does 200 views or 2 million views and 99% of operators on this app have never been told it Once you understand it, going viral becomes embarrassingly predictable. Every "algorithm hack" you've ever read becomes irrelevant the day you internalise the rule The rule is this: The size of the audience whose belief your first sentence violates IS the ceiling of your post. Forever. Every platform. Every era of marketing since 1947. Every product ever sold to humans That's it. That's the whole game. Read it again Now the part that takes 95% of operators 7 months to figure out, if they ever do at all There are 3 tiers of beliefs you can violate with a first sentence. Each tier has a hard ceiling. The ceiling is set the second you type that first sentence and nothing else moves it. Not formatting. Not editing. Not your follower count. Not the algorithm TIER 1: Beliefs only your sub-niche holds Stuff like "cold email open rates dropped 8% in Q3" or "most ecom brands undervalue their backend funnel" or "Section 179 rules just changed for SUVs" Maybe 4,000 humans on earth hold the prior belief strong enough to feel the violation. The other 8 billion read it and feel literally nothing because they don't have the prior belief to begin with Ceiling on a tier 1 hook: 30k views. The algorithm did its job. It measured how fast every non-niche reader scrolled past and killed the post This is where 95% of you live. You've been writing tier 1 hooks for 7 months and blaming the algo for the 30k view ceiling that's mathematically baked into the choice you made before you ever hit publish TIER 2: Beliefs your industry's broader category holds Stuff like "most marketers think CAC is the right metric. Wrong" or "real estate investors are pricing rates wrong this year" Maybe 400,000 humans hold the prior. Ceiling: 200k views. Bookmarked by a few hundred operators in adjacent niches. Never breaks containment Algo lights up green for those 200k humans because they stayed, lights up red for the other 7.99 billion who scrolled TIER 3: Beliefs every adult on earth holds without realising they hold them McDonald's is a burger company. Hospitals charge fair prices. The IRS will destroy you. Diamonds are valuable because they're rare. Marriage requires a ring. Insurance pays out claims. Casinos are random. Schools educate. Banks are vaults. Wine got better as it got expensive Every adult holds 200+ of these beliefs without ever having examined them once in their life Tier 3 violations are the only first sentences that break 1 million views. Period. No exceptions Go pull the top 50 posts on this platform from any month in the last 3 years and stare at the first sentence of each. Every single one violates a tier 3 belief. Not one of them is tier 1 The neurological reason this happens is stupid simple once you see it The reader's brain runs pattern-completion half a second ahead of his conscious reading. When your first 30 characters set up a familiar institution his pattern engine has already auto-completed what comes next based on his existing belief about that institution When your next 20 characters deliver something that violates the auto-completion, the engine throws a mismatch error. He cannot scroll until the error resolves Tier 1 hooks never trigger the error because the reader's pattern engine doesn't even have an auto-completion for "Section 179 SUV deductions." It registers "industry jargon" and scrolls in 200 milliseconds Now the converting half. This is the part that turns 2 million views into $500k of inbound Going viral and converting at the same time requires one move 99% of operators get backwards The hook violates a tier 3 belief. Then by sentence 4 of the body, you bridge that same hidden logic into the specific market your offer serves Not sentence 8. Not paragraph 6. Sentence 4 That's the window where the reader's pattern engine is still hot from the hook violation and ready to accept that your offer runs on the same hidden mechanism as the universal entity in the hook The bridge structure is this: "This is the same mechanism every [reader's industry] founder is sleeping on right now" Then 2-3 sentences mapping the universal entity onto his world. Then operational steps. Then proof. Then a closer that fits on a post-it the reader can screenshot and send to his team Most operators write a tier 3 hook then stay broad for 800 words. They write 400 more words about McDonald's. Post does 500k views and zero DMs Viral hit happened. Conversion didn't. Reader exited thinking about burgers instead of thinking about your offer That's the difference between a viral creator with no money and a creator quietly clearing six figures off the same posts Once the bridge fires correctly, every signal in that leaked X source code lights up green automatically Dwell time stretches past 90 seconds because the reader is mentally re-filing his own business model. Shares stack because the reader is screenshotting the post-it closer and dropping it in his team slack. In-network boost compounds because his followers see him engaging. The slop score lights up clean because actual humans actually read it cover to cover Y You wrote one sentence that violated a belief held by 4 billion humans and a second sentence that mapped the same logic back to the audience you actually wanted to convert. The algorithm just measured what happened Run the numbers: One post in the right shape pulls 200k to 2M impressions. 500 to 3,000 profile clicks. 20 to 300 inbound DMs. 5 to 80 calls booked. 3 to 50 closes at $5-50k AOV $15k to $2M+ from a single post over 30-90 days as it compounds. Stack 30 a year and one twitter account becomes a 7 to 8 figure asset. Zero ads. Zero email list. Zero follower count required Reading X source code is what people do when they don't know how to write the first sentence The eight figure operators on this app aren't decoding shit. They're picking tier 3 beliefs and bridging by sentence 4 Most of you will read this and still bookmark another algo thread on Monday If you have a real offer above $5k AOV and you want to stop screaming into the void… DM me or go to yegor.com
Alex Finn@AlexFinn

Elon just updated the entire X algorithm code I just went through all 24,000 lines of the algo What I read blew me away Here’s everything you need to know about how to go viral and if you can still get shadowbanned: 🧵

English
18
7
166
27.6K
333MsOratorical retweetledi
Joe Pags Pagliarulo
Joe Pags Pagliarulo@JoeTalkShow·
I have 289k followers. I rarely gain any -- and lose all the time. Here is the actual engagement of my last 12 posts. These numbers are all in the thousands: 2.9, 2.6, 84, 1.6, 12, 9.2, 9.7, 1.6, 2.5, 6.6, 1.7, 20 Approaching 300k people have decided to follow me. I'm just one of TONS of accounts treated the same. This while @elonmusk and @nikitabier continue to pretend this algorithm is working. It's not.
English
70
34
285
17.7K
333MsOratorical
333MsOratorical@333MsOratorical·
I use X as a notebook of my favorite things FUCK THE ALGORITHMS
333MsOratorical tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
333MsOratorical
333MsOratorical@333MsOratorical·
If you want to change X for the better, start everybody at 0 & verify all! Then introduce high paying money & don’t allow people to change their username! Until you do it-you’re just stealing people’s money & scammin people yourself. The blue check is your shitcoin. @elonmusk
333MsOratorical tweet media
English
0
0
1
8
333MsOratorical
333MsOratorical@333MsOratorical·
@nikitabier @AdamLowisz @ianmiles If you want to change X for the better, start everybody at 0 & verify all! Then introduce high paying money & don’t allow people to change their username! Until you do it-you’re just stealing people’s money & scammin people yourself. The blue check is your shitcoin.
English
0
0
1
774
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
@ianmiles Perhaps it's not the algorithm but rather, the sudden pivot from politics to promoting scam coins? I have seen users lose some reach after engaging in criminal activity and robbing their followers.
Nikita Bier tweet media
English
531
243
8.7K
474.8K
South Dallas Foodie
South Dallas Foodie@SouthDallasFood·
So according to the open source that was released today about the 𝕏 algorithm we should only post like four times a day. I’ve been posting content on this app since 2009 and I typically post anywhere from 6 to 12 or more times a day. I get thousands of replies a day and I have no idea how many times I respond, it’s way too many times to count. This has been my full-time job for the last two years. So now what? I’m gonna get punished for posting too often? Am I engaging too much? This is also confusing. @nikitabier @elonmusk HELP.
GIF
English
12
2
25
3.3K
333MsOratorical retweetledi
healthbot
healthbot@thehealthb0t·
How to make Amish ibuprofen This tincture is good up to a year, no need to refrigerate but you can if you'd like. Keep in a cool, dry, dark place. You can take it straight or add a few drops to water or tea if you prefer a milder taste.
English
18
622
2.5K
106.9K
333MsOratorical retweetledi
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
𝕏 - ✅ open source algorithm Youtube ❌ Facebook ❌ Instagram ❌ TikTok ❌ Reddit ❌ Threads ❌ Why do other social networks not make their algorithms open-source?
English
1.3K
1.7K
11.8K
40.6M
333MsOratorical retweetledi
Health Nest
Health Nest@OurHealthNest·
Whipped Honey Coffee ☕
English
12
122
1.2K
95.7K
TaraBull
TaraBull@TaraBull·
Full looksmaxxing transformation $40k invested Before: soft jaw, acne scars, no definition. After: carved jawline, high cheekbones, balanced lips, clear skin. Worth the money and recovery?
English
872
23
228
135.8K
Joey Swoll
Joey Swoll@TheJoeySwoll·
Hey @X is this a joke? I call out inappropriate behavior and content in gyms but there is NEVER any nudity and if there is, I cover it up. Millions of views which YOU get paid for and not even a discussion? There was no “thorough” review. Just one email and DONE. Do better X…
Joey Swoll tweet media
English
2.7K
2.7K
38K
2M
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
The pesticides being used in our food are causing a massive population decline in the United States.
English
1.6K
2.9K
15.3K
290.5K