NYCWelfareStatePolitics

7.6K posts

NYCWelfareStatePolitics

NYCWelfareStatePolitics

@3stddev

Documenting the terminal decline of NYC.

NYC Katılım Aralık 2014
90 Takip Edilen91 Takipçiler
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@SamoBurja Agreed but we need events like these to push us along. That’s generally how human nature works. Desperation breeds ingenuity.
English
0
0
0
16
Samo Burja
Samo Burja@SamoBurja·
We have to build more of every type of energy (coal, nuclear, solar, natural gas) while also reducing oil consumption. China has figured out that it has to escape the oil trap. The United States needs to do the same. Forget carbon neutral, this is national security.
English
20
23
249
14.8K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@myer80066 @CliffordDMay These assholes are literally Just peddling third worlderism at this point where the US is always losing. If you told cretins that the Nazis literally fought until the last day even as they were decimated, they wouldn’t believe you because “only America sucks”.
English
0
0
0
11
Joshua
Joshua@myer80066·
@CliffordDMay It’s telling how shooting 10-15 missiles a day and striking a target every 1-2 days, most relatively unimportant, is viewed as maintaining a strong military If any other military historically was subdued the way Iran is this wouldn’t be a question
English
1
0
0
28
Clifford D. May
Clifford D. May@CliffordDMay·
Perhaps she's right and the U.S. assessment have overstated the degree of degradation of Tehran's military capabilities. Or perhaps Tehran's military capabilities were underestimated prior to this conflict. Either way, it stand to reason: Good that this conflict is taking place now, not a year or two from now when Tehran's military capabilities (and nuclear weapons program) would be significantly advanced.
Nicole Grajewski@NicoleGrajewski

My comments in this @Reuters exclusive: Even after weeks of strikes, Iran continues launching from sites that have been heavily targeted. That suggests U.S. assessments may be overstating degradation.

English
1
0
10
830
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@TrentTelenko The best way to punish aggressive foes over the ages has been to take away their land. Thats the only way these MFers learn.
English
0
0
0
117
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
But you don’t understand. China is the only one that can build anything anymore and we all must bow down to it. Weapons are like statues. They’re there to be admired and not used. If we do have to use them it’s only when there’s a great power conflict so if there’s something wrong with them we only find out when we’re in really deep shit. You just don’t get it.
English
0
0
0
22
Daniel Friedman
Daniel Friedman@DanFriedman81·
So what? Iran is one of maybe three countries we’d use them on and we aren’t going to war with China anytime soon. And if we had to, we could convert other capacity and ramp up military production.
Kelly Grieco@ka_grieco

Yikes. The US has burned through ~850 Tomahawks in 4 weeks. That's roughly a quarter of the inventory. At ~600 produced/year, that's ~1.5 years of production gone in a month. Hard to see what long-term political goal this buys. washingtonpost.com/national-secur…

English
3
0
15
1.6K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@myer80066 @ratlpolicy Regular MIL standard are the Russo -UK war where RU couldn’t achieve air superiority even with a 10x larger Air Force and against their own self designed air defense systems.
English
0
0
3
33
Joshua
Joshua@myer80066·
@ratlpolicy Exactly. Argue geopolitical strategy if you want, but don’t pretend that this is anything other than a military ass whooping We’ve just gotten so used to dominance that we forget what regular military standards would feel like
English
2
0
13
547
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
Considering not one F-35 has been downed among US or Israeli Air Force’s and considering it played a substantial role in removing the nuclear threat from Iran, $1.7 trillion amortized over 30+ years seems cheap. If Iran wanted to trade just their nuclear ambitions in a peaceful way for $1.7 trillion, wouldn’t that be a good deal?
English
0
0
9
165
Teachme Chicago
Teachme Chicago@MktAnalysisD·
@ratlpolicy The F-35's $1.7T lifetime cost and chronic delays illustrate acquisition dysfunction. But questioning procurement efficiency isn't the same as proving tech doesn't work.
English
3
0
6
1.1K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@ratlpolicy Third worlderism on X is very strong. It’s always America sucks but somehow their own country is complete and total shit. This guys from the UK. The UK is a shell of its former self but America sucks is what they want to expound on all day.
English
1
0
85
1.3K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
You’re right. They supplied a higher percentage of oil and nat gas to the EU which was “only” 20% of global GDP. Even if all of the oil and nat gas gets taken offline in the gulf, it’ll take 6 months - year but the world will adjust. Every major conflict has spiked oil 100%+. This is all the pussified west and anti American third worlderism on social media acting like it’s the end of the world.
English
1
0
0
53
Anna Wong
Anna Wong@AnnaEconomist·
I am not a geopolitical analyst. But my guess (which is as good as anyone’s) is that Trump will escalate. And there will be a point in the next two months when oil will reach $150-$200.
Idrees Ali@idreesali114

Qatar, Oman and Kuwait are pushing behind closed doors for a swift end to the war. The UAE, Saudi ‌Arabia and Bahrain ⁠say they are ready to absorb an escalation of the war and will not accept a post-war Iran that is still able to use the Strait of Hormuz as a bargaining chip.

English
39
43
541
88.7K
lfjncl
lfjncl@lfjncl9891·
@3stddev @constans No, i think every American is a capitalist, and they would never invest without ROI Your only hope is them fleecing your government as they do with defense spending
English
1
0
0
13
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@lfjncl9891 @constans Mining isn’t some leading edge tech. It’s heavy industry. Of course it couldn’t be accomplished in a year but within 5 years we’d be all set. What’s holding things back is regulation and poor ROI for investors.
English
1
0
0
10
lfjncl
lfjncl@lfjncl9891·
@3stddev @constans Not at the scale required, supplying the weapons manufacturing of the biggest producer world wide would be difficult when starting from scratch with no knowledge in the field
English
1
0
0
18
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
@lfjncl9891 @constans “Takes a lot of time” is all dependent on resources and attention. Things can be done fast if the necessary resources and attention are directed at them.
English
1
0
0
10
lfjncl
lfjncl@lfjncl9891·
@constans it takes a lot of time to set up the extraction and refinement and the us industry is you know
English
1
0
3
125
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
Exactly. Ignorant retards online just regurgitating the same old “America is finished narrative” by sincerely believing China is the end all, be all on this earth. Of course, we also had US politicians and a US elite who were scumbags that only knew how to play domestic culture war politics so it appeared that the US was/is completely inept.
English
1
0
0
11
PhilosophyDad
PhilosophyDad@PhilosophyDad1·
@constans Minerals aren't rare. The world is massive. The US has all these minerals. We dont mine them because its more expensive than subsidies chinese labor and its environmentally destructive.
English
1
0
1
106
Michael Shurkin
Michael Shurkin@MichaelShurkin·
@LahavHarkov Whether it's the right prism depends on what the objectives are. The problem is that neither the US nor Israel clearly has articulated its objectives.
English
1
0
1
313
Lahav Harkov
Lahav Harkov@LahavHarkov·
The White House said Iran’s missile capability is “functionally destroyed.” Israel says Iran can no longer produce ballistic missiles. So why are Israelis running for shelter multiple times a day? And is missile capability the right prism through which to examine the war?
English
25
18
128
11.3K
NYCWelfareStatePolitics
Wha? You think Iran can keep control of the strait if there’s a sustained campaign to wrestle it away from them? This platform is filled with morons who pretend like the IRGC are the German Nazi war machine of 1939. The IRGC are literally a bunch of clowns who only know how to fire poorly constructed, inaccurate missiles.
English
1
0
1
88
Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬
I understand the UAE/Saudi/Bahrain preference here, but also, what's the real plan for making Iran unable to control Hormuz? Feels like the only way to do that is Emirati control of a bunch of the islands near the Iranian shore, and that seems... challenging.
Idrees Ali@idreesali114

Qatar, Oman and Kuwait are pushing behind closed doors for a swift end to the war. The UAE, Saudi ‌Arabia and Bahrain ⁠say they are ready to absorb an escalation of the war and will not accept a post-war Iran that is still able to use the Strait of Hormuz as a bargaining chip.

English
8
0
28
4.6K