41Carter
1.6K posts


@41Carter1 @Lucie_Fur99 If the photos existed, they would certainly stand up in court it's the type of evidence that the cps has wet dreams over and gives them result. There aren't any photos, because the BBC would also have them, no photos no crime especially with the lads testimony
English

@Jayman29439413 @Lucie_Fur99 I will push back there, the police before charging ask the CPS, and the CPS advice on the level evidence obtained at that point in time. The so called evidence either isn’t there or wouldn’t stand up in court
English

@41Carter1 @Lucie_Fur99 If he received picture of minor when 17 even if 20 now, the police are still duty bound to charge him because of evidence, only the cps can dismiss the charge, the alleged victim will have no say on whether he is charged or not. Meaning....there were no pictures or criminality
English

@MsHelicat @archer_rs Helen defender of the faith - devote watcher of the news at 10
English

@CrispinFeltcher @Stephen65099192 @archer_rs Mate are you okay 😂
Sherlock Holmes, Poirot, Frost, Barnaby which one of these fine fellows take your fancy
English

@41Carter1 @Stephen65099192 @archer_rs So lots of nasty peeps just go free because people don't hand evidence over? 😆
Have you heard of detectives?
English

@MsHelicat @archer_rs Apparently they were 17 at the time, and I read a book last week unlike some…
English

@claudes_big_toe @archer_rs Horse shit, I personally would come out fighting not hiding in a hospital. If it’s true bull shit I would be so angry I would in front of a mic defences my self dropping c bombs
English

@CrispinFeltcher @Stephen65099192 @archer_rs The issue is the law between age of consent and lewd photos under 18 it’s abit of a meh
English

@41Carter1 @Stephen65099192 @archer_rs Then we'll see the complainant on charges from withholding evidence. Let's see if that happens.
English

@Jayman29439413 @Lucie_Fur99 I’m going with, parents going for a money grab, Huw did get pictures of a minor when they were 17. The minor now 20 wants no involvement, so the CPS and police have no where to go if they did charge and would loose in court
English

@41Carter1 @Lucie_Fur99 Nope if there was evidence he'd be in handcuffs now. Police found zero evidence, which means BBC literally has zero evidence, which means the sun has zero evidence and just the word of parents........so either sunn lied, told untruths, or parents lied take your pick
English

@CrispinFeltcher @Stephen65099192 @archer_rs So they press charges but they’re key witness doesn’t cooperate from day one, sure the CPS can smell a winner there
English

@41Carter1 @Stephen65099192 @archer_rs That's nonsense. If the Crown Prosecution Service and police think there is public interest to press charges they can.
English

@NathanMarzan @Thee_Roxy_Cox You are correct - but I agree Huw is attracted to children so your right he’s a nonce - we are full circle with this feed
English

@ruby_willi44176 @red_reddington @allison_stu @Lorraine_Shrops @archer_rs Was it actually a boy - bbc and closet gays man
English

@red_reddington @41Carter1 @allison_stu @Lorraine_Shrops @archer_rs They arnt prosecuting because the boy was 17 and not 16
English

@ruby_willi44176 @red_reddington @allison_stu @Lorraine_Shrops @archer_rs Ruby do a quick research on the English law 😂
English

@red_reddington @Stephen65099192 @archer_rs Killer in your sentence they reported - the child hadn’t it’s the parents.
50% money grab
50% Hue is abit noncey
English



