4C Drip

977 posts

4C Drip banner
4C Drip

4C Drip

@4C_Drip

I'm Brooklyn. I react to videos...that's pretty much it right now.

Yo mama's pus...I'm sorry. Katılım Ocak 2013
57 Takip Edilen635 Takipçiler
🔻 چیمہ ᴄʜᴇᴇᴍᴀ
@BryceHall you probably could make a billion right now spreading your booty cheeks but that doesn’t mean it would not be a humiliating thing to do
English
29
72
10.4K
176.2K
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@PHLITE1 @_Ochiedike ok..but god is described as loving and all knowing, yet his actions aren't consistent with that description. Saying god is big and humans are small doesn't answer the question of why a painful method of death was chosen and why innocent lives were included at all.
English
2
0
0
15
PHLITE
PHLITE@PHLITE1·
@4C_Drip @_Ochiedike Bro Your though process tells me you have very little life experience... I get it babys are innocent and precious and should be protected, no normal disagree. But God is not a human he created the entire UNIVERSE and its atomic structure... Human are smaller than ants, sand
English
1
0
0
22
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@Legithustlex0 @kaylah_osas Also “he'd have to repay the debt somehow, which would naturally mean selling his labor to another master” where are you getting this from, the verse just says let them live freely and don’t oppress them.
English
1
0
0
16
👤
👤@Legithustlex0·
The "permanent ownership" applies specifically to non Israelite slaves because Hebrew slaves had a built in time limit. Yet, the runaway protection still applies to both types of slaves/servants. The thing is that hebrew slaves were typically debt slaves. If the slave/servant ran away, you wouldn't return him to his original master instead, he'd have to repay the debt somehow, which would naturally mean selling his labor to another master (or working it off). There's no real loophole here. A "permanent" (foreign) slave could still run away if they chose to. But in practice, anywhere they fled to would likely be worse than staying with a good master, so why run?
English
2
0
0
58
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@Legithustlex0 @kaylah_osas If foreign slaves are “permanent property,” that only means something if the owner has the right to recover them. But you’re also saying any runaway slave can’t be returned. If “permanent property ”can’t be returned, then they’re not actually permanent property in practice.
English
1
0
1
36
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@realMWO @AgentVenom141 @Mashall788 @DeeWaynee94 God commands love, but also allows masters to be beat their slaves? You don't see the contradiction? You say slavery was about paying off debts or crimes, yet the Bible clearly allows permanent, inherited slavery of foreigners. That is chattel slavery.
English
0
0
0
10
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Atheism has no holy book, no commandments, no worship, and no doctrine ordering anyone to kill. You’re blaming murders on a thing people didn’t believe instead of the ideologies and power structures they actually followed.
Eric Hovind@erichovind

So true!

English
267
729
10.9K
180.2K
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@Legithustlex0 @kaylah_osas Your interpretation conflicts with god saying non-Israelite slaves are permanent property. If a slave can’t be returned, then the “permanent ownership” law can’t actually be enforced. And if it can be enforced, then the "runaway protection" law doesn't apply to both slave types
English
1
0
3
41
👤
👤@Legithustlex0·
Nope, the verse never specifies a runaway slave entering Israel from outside, it's about any slave who escapes to an Israelite, whether from within Israel (home) or from abroad (away). The text says: they must be allowed to stay in your midst (among your people/family), and to live freely in whichever town they choose. Once a permanent slave flees, their refuge is guaranteed Meaning, they stay unless they decide to leave, the only reason they'll, run is if the conditions for staying isn't favorable.
English
1
0
0
57
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@AgentVenom141 @realMWO @Mashall788 @DeeWaynee94 Why is god conforming to the times back then? If he wants something to stop, like idol worshoping and child sacrifices, he stops it, he's done it many times. And since when were you allowed to beat, own and bore your neighbors? You can be treated like neighbors without slavery.
English
1
0
0
18
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@charlesiyare1 @kaylah_osas @Legithustlex0 I read the bible and saw god giving instructions on how to buy slaves, who you can buy them from, how long to keep them, how much you can abuse them, and that you can pass them down to your children as property lmao.
English
0
1
2
8
Charles Iyare
Charles Iyare@charlesiyare1·
@kaylah_osas @Legithustlex0 God offers you (heaven/paradise, eternity with him)you chose what he isn't part of (darkness). Why not try to obey him and see the difference, than border yourself about hell. If only you read your bible, you should have known that he'll is for the devil & those who tow his part.
English
1
0
0
38
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@Legithustlex0 @kaylah_osas That verse is talking about foreign runaway slaves entering Israel, not slaves owned by Israelites. Also, god explicitly states that non-Israelite slaves were permanent property. Why would he say that if slaves could just leave if they wanted? So no, slavery was not consensual.
English
1
1
3
48
👤
👤@Legithustlex0·
Lol, I've had this exact debate a thousand times. Every single person I've argued with ended up conceding once I laid out the full rationale and context behind slavery in ancient Israel. I don't have time to go deep right now and set you straight, but here's the key point: slavery, at its core was concesual because slaves could run away. Deuteronomy 23:15-16 commands that no escaped slave, no matter who they are, should be handed back to their master. They get to live freely among the Israelites, wherever they choose, without oppression. In other words, bondage only continues if the person chooses to stay. If they run, Israel was legally required to protect them and let them go free. That makes the system inherently consensual at its core, people only stayed because life was better under a good master, not because they were forced to. God bless you. 🤍
English
1
0
0
84
Patrick Amoasah
Patrick Amoasah@AmoasahPat84067·
@4C_Drip @DeeWaynee94 Beautiful now in your early answer you said some atheist believe there are infinite numbers of genders so with the original tweet do you agree that people claiming other gods doesn't negate the fact that Christian say Jesus is the only true God
English
1
0
0
11
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@AmoasahPat84067 @DeeWaynee94 What do you mean you don't need to define it? Everyone has different interpretations of the word. How do I know you definition is the same as mine if you don't define it?
English
1
0
0
26
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@realMWO @Mashall788 @DeeWaynee94 I don't know who god actually is? I can say the same about you. God giving instructions on how to regulate slavery and allowing it instead of making it a sin is an endorsement of slavery. And who cares if slaves were set free? That doesn't justify a loving god allowing slavery.
English
1
0
0
20
Midwest Ordnance
Midwest Ordnance@realMWO·
@4C_Drip @Mashall788 @DeeWaynee94 It’s literally not. You don’t know who God actually is. Do not claim to know God and who he is when you clearly do not believe what he says & does. God doesn’t promote slavery, time and time again those in slavery are set free. Again, read the Bible and you’d know that.
English
2
0
0
24
4C Drip
4C Drip@4C_Drip·
@AmoasahPat84067 @DeeWaynee94 How are we defining gender? And what's the correlation? There are atheists who believe there are 2 genders and there are atheists who believe there are an infinite number of them. Atheism doesn't have any rules, laws, or doctrines unlike relgion.
English
1
0
0
32