Dee 🌹

53K posts

Dee 🌹 banner
Dee 🌹

Dee 🌹

@DeeWaynee94

Atheist. I’m allergic to “trust me bro” theology. 🤧 🚮

Katılım Şubat 2023
263 Takip Edilen6.8K Takipçiler
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
His personal religion isn’t the legal point. He said “religious people” as a public virtue argument, not “America belongs to Christianity”. And as president, Adams still signed a treaty saying the US government was not founded on the Christian religion. That’s the bit you’re trying to dodge.
English
1
1
8
34
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
1797, under John Adams: the Treaty of Tripoli said the US was “not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” Article VI bans religious tests. The First Amendment blocks establishment. Obama didn’t start this. He just annoyed people who skipped the paperwork.
The Conservative Alternative@OldeWorldOrder

The USA is a Christian nation. Every President always acknowledged this simple fact ... up until Obama. That's when things started to change. Obama & Biden are the ONLY TWO Presidents in US history that have denied our Christian foundation. Elections matter.

English
1
0
11
229
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Adams said “moral and religious”, not “Christian state”. Same Adams signed the Treaty of Tripoli, which said the US government was “not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” You’ve turned a warning about public virtue into a Christian ownership claim, then added Epstein panic on top like seasoning.
English
1
0
7
33
Matt Lynch
Matt Lynch@BraintreeLynch·
@DeeWaynee94 John Adam's said our constitution was for a moral and religious people whole inadequate for anything else. Now that we are a immoral secular society we have epstein type networks that rule over us. Removing Christianity from America is retarded
English
1
0
0
21
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Your mind is not serious until it can interrogate its own favourite beliefs.
English
1
0
10
87
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
@RealJeffClark Uncomfortable doesn’t mean false. Agreed. But “biblical” doesn’t mean true either. A claim still has to survive evidence, coherence, and reality, not just carry a verse number and a serious tone.
English
0
0
9
42
Jeff Clark
Jeff Clark@RealJeffClark·
There are many biblical truths that are uncomfortable. It doesn’t make them less truthful.
English
2
0
11
152
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Life didn’t arrive to find Earth “perfect”. Life is what survived the conditions Earth happened to offer, then spent billions of years adapting to them. Calling that a miracle is like a fish praising the puddle for being exactly fish-shaped.
Colton@ColtonOgburn

Never understood the "it's a miracle that our planet is just the right distance from the Sun to have life." No, what would be a miracle is if life developed on a planet where the conditions WEREN'T perfect for life to evolve.

English
0
0
14
156
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Me explaining burden of proof to a believer for the 900th time.
Dee 🌹 tweet media
English
2
3
24
162
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
I’m not saying ignore second-order effects. I’m saying they don’t erase the first-order structure. Red gives you guaranteed personal survival. Blue is a coordination bet with moral upside. If someone values guilt/social collapse highly enough, blue can be rational for them, but the original claim was stronger than that: “blue means nobody dies.” It doesn’t.
English
1
0
10
58
Jonathan ⚡
Jonathan ⚡@jonathanbylos·
"Every outcome" ok so not assuming 2nd order effects, why? What's the point if a 2nd order effects has the potential to be self-defeating, so then it's question of how many people reason like that, that have that preference or perspective. Maybe you personally can ignore 2nd order effects (or welcome them), but it seems unfair and unreasonable that everyone else just "should" or "would" ignore them It's a "vote" which implies a sentiment/preference about the future, not just the present. You vote in an election presumably not just for the immediate result ("a president") but the implications of that result ("what you believe that admin will do in office" etc)
English
1
0
0
38
Tevin
Tevin@YourBudTevin·
I’ve seen like 800 tweets about this but my simple way of thinking is: If you choose blue, you don’t want anyone to die. It is impossible for anyone to die if you press blue. If you choose red, you are afraid of others choosing red. The only way anyone dies at all is if you choose red. When I read this, I actually don’t think about myself. I think about hurting the least amount of people. So I pick blue.
MrBeast@MrBeast

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

English
333
61
2.7K
314.2K
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
I left church, then realised “God” was mostly the church still living in my head. The guilt, the surveillance, the bargaining, the fear of being wrong… once that wiring came out, there wasn’t much left except a claim with no evidence. 🤷🏿‍♂️
Angela💙@amangieh

I left church but I didn't leave God. You?

English
0
0
11
130
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
@jonathanbylos @YourBudTevin “other incentives” exist, but they’re not the same category. Red protects your own survival in every outcome. Blue only works if enough strangers coordinate with you. Survivor’s guilt and social collapse are aftermath costs, not the immediate survival condition.
English
1
0
11
75
Jonathan ⚡
Jonathan ⚡@jonathanbylos·
@DeeWaynee94 @YourBudTevin You are discounting other incentives/disincentives (mostly 2nd order): 1. Survivor's guilt (children may have voted blue) 2. Risk of total collapse means red is not risk free, such that some selfish voters decide that red is self-defeating (not worth free-riding either)
English
2
0
0
100
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
@Elishabenabuya “ass could be interpreted differently” is exactly how you know humans got involved. One vague travel detail and suddenly Mary’s got a holy lay-by. Biblical roadside services.
English
0
0
6
47
Elisha ben Abuyah
Elisha ben Abuyah@Elishabenabuya·
@DeeWaynee94 There’s also a “holy site” with a large flat stone where Mary supposedly rested her ass before entering Bethlehem. I suppose that “ass” could be interpreted differently!
English
0
0
4
57
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
The Bible doesn’t say Mary rode a donkey to Bethlehem. Somewhere along the line, Christmas needed transport and humans started doing biblical Uber.
English
4
3
31
441
Dee 🌹 retweetledi
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Modern cells needing modern DNA machinery doesn’t prove creation. It proves modern cells are complex. Stunning breakthrough, lads. Biology survives another Canva animation. The actual origin question is earlier hereditary chemistry becoming more complex over time, not today’s replisome popping into existence fully assembled like god ordered it off Amazon. 🥴
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined

Proof Life was Created. DNA Replication requires 9 complex nano-machines working together. Without them, DNA can't replicate. If DNA can't replicate, Life can't evolve.

English
5
3
55
1.9K
Dee 🌹 retweetledi
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
The wheel wasn’t “around 300 BC” anyway. Try around 3500 BC in Mesopotamia. And “BC” proves a Christian calendar convention existed centuries later, not that Jesus was divine, resurrected, or worth worshipping. Man brought a gotcha and invented a calendar-shaped rake to step on. 🥴
Giga Based Dad@GigaBasedDad

Got'em

English
14
9
86
3.5K
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
Blue is chasing the best collective outcome. Red is managing betrayal risk in a private vote. That’s why everyone’s arguing past each other. One side is asking “what world do we want after this?” and the other is asking “what happens if strangers don’t cooperate?” Annoyingly, both questions matter.
English
0
0
10
44
Walter Loggetti 💩
Walter Loggetti 💩@walterloggetti·
@DeeWaynee94 @J_D_Becerra @YourBudTevin Red pusher and blue pusher are analizing the dilemma in two different ways. What I'm seeing is that blue pushers think what happen next, and what goal they want to obtain.
Prato, Tuscany 🇮🇹 English
2
0
3
54
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
“Let us take the risk” is fine. That’s your vote. But a private vote doesn’t transfer your gamble onto me like emotional contactless. Blue is the moral bet if enough people join it; red is the survival hedge if they don’t. Trying your best doesn’t change the payoff table. It just gives the coffin a nicer caption.
English
0
0
10
71
La Nao de China
La Nao de China@J_D_Becerra·
@DeeWaynee94 @YourBudTevin So it becomes somebody else's problem once you tried your best and failed, but if you succeed all is safe Weren't you concerned with your own survival? Let us take the risk
English
2
0
3
72
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
@meacheww “Jesus is for everyone” lands differently from a religion with denominations, purity rules, heresy labels and whole churches arguing over who counts as saved. People don’t hate Jesus. They’re tired of humans using him as a divine mask for their own control issues.
English
2
0
16
103
𝓂𝒶𝓉𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓌
𝓂𝒶𝓉𝓉𝒽ℯ𝓌@meacheww·
People don't like Jesus Christ because Jesus is for everyone and can't be controlled People like Jesus because Jesus is for everyone and doesn't conform to others standards
English
4
2
8
243
Dee 🌹
Dee 🌹@DeeWaynee94·
@AgainstAtheismX Atheism isn’t a lifestyle manual. It’s one position: I don’t believe your god exists. I live exactly like that every day. No prayers, no worship, no holy threats needed to work out basic human decency.
English
1
3
32
158
Against Atheism
Against Atheism@AgainstAtheismX·
No Atheist lives as if Atheism is true.
English
46
6
40
2.2K

Keşfet

@RealJeffClark @jonathanbylos @YourBudTevin @Elishabenabuya @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13 @cristiano