Sabitlenmiş Tweet
“Articulate and Bright and Clean”
6.8K posts
“Articulate and Bright and Clean”
@66Psquared
“There are decades where nothing happens, and weeks where decades happen.” Vladimir Lenin
Katılım Nisan 2014
3.7K Takip Edilen936 Takipçiler
@HouseOfHorrorCo Maybe more so than Obsession.
English
@aleedreayn No need to rewatch it. Your conclusion is correct.
English
@staidindoors @thatismrman2u Actually these are old tired voices. Sadly, I think he loves/hates women. He chose hate. Whatever.
English
@thatismrman2u My first thought coming out of it was I loved it and it's exciting to get new voices in horror.
English
@riccckkkyboy @k1rallik RickyBoy? OK, gay bot.
English
@66Psquared @k1rallik Nihilistic misogyny… spoken like a true faggot
English
do you understand what happened to obsession..
a 26 year old former youtuber made a horror movie for $750k. it opened to $17.2m on may 15. then something happened that hollywood analysts called "really unheard of"
second weekend grew 30%. Every single horror movie front loads, every movie loses 50-70% in week 2, and this one went up.
- best sophomore weekend for a horror movie ever recorded, beating the record heart eyes set last year
- on pace to cross $80m worldwide in just 10 days, already 100x its budget
- a24 handed curry barker the entire texas chainsaw franchise with extraordinary creative control before the film opened wide
- blumhouse already shot his follow up with aaron paul and bryce dallas howard
it cost less than the catering budget for the mandalorian and grogu
BuBBliK@k1rallik
> be obsession > horror movie made for $750k > drop in theaters may 15 > tracking $8m opening weekend > open to $17.2m instead > hit $30m in week one > top box office monday tuesday wednesday > beat michael, devil wears prada 2, mortal kombat 2 > first sub-$1m budget film to top box office in 17 years > last one was paranormal activity in 2009 > second weekend forecast up 29% instead of dropping > on pace to be 4th sub-$1m film ever to cross $100m > already made 40x its budget studio executives at warner are pacing the room wondering why $200m superhero movies can't do this
English
@VSkanderbe16456 @k1rallik small dick bot
English
@66Psquared @k1rallik Consider that you're just a media illiterate commie faggot who didn't understand the movie
English
@realJayManley @k1rallik How did it make you feel, Jay?
English
“Articulate and Bright and Clean” retweetledi
The damage that the charlatan @BarackObama has done to the United States is incalculable. He is swimming in an infinity pool of malignant narcissism. A true scammer filled with destructive ideological anti-American zeal.
GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE@GOP_is_Gutless
Mike Gallagher, the 8th most recognized talk radio personality, in the U.S.A., is heard by over 2.25 million listeners weekly. He compiled and wrote the following essay entitled, "Obama: It was You." * It was you who spoke these words at an Islamic dinner - "I am one of you." * It was you who on ABC News referenced - "My Muslim faith." * It was you who gave $100 million in U.S. taxpayer funds to rebuild foreign mosques. * It was you who wrote that in the event of a conflict- "I will stand with the Muslims." * It was you who assured the Egyptian Foreign Minister that - "I am a Muslim." * It was you who bowed in submission before the Saudi King. * It was you who sat for 20 years in a Liberation Theology Church condemning America and professing Marxism. * It was you who exempted Muslims from penalties under Obamacare that the rest of us have to pay. * It was you who purposefully omitted - "endowed by our Creator " - from your recitation of The Declaration Of Independence. * It was you who mocked the Bible and Jesus Christ's Sermon On The Mount while repeatedly referring to the 'HOLY' Qur'an. * It was you who traveled the Islamic world denigrating the United States Of America. * It was you who instantly threw the support of your administration behind the building of the Ground Zero Victory mosque overlooking the hallowed crater of the World Trade Center. * It was you who refused to attend the National Prayer Breakfast, but hastened to host an Islamic prayer breakfast at the White House * It was you who ordered Georgetown Univ. and Notre Dame to shroud all vestiges of Jesus Christ BEFORE you would agree to go there to speak, but in contrast, you have NEVER requested the mosques you have visited to adjust their decor. * It was you who appointed anti-Christian fanatics to your Czar Corps. * It was you who appointed rabid Islamists to Homeland Security. * It was you who said that NASA's "foremost mission" was an outreach to Muslim communities. * It was you who as an Illinois Senator was the ONLY individual who would speak in favor of infanticide. * It was you who was the first President not to give a Christmas Greeting from the White House, and went so far as to hang photos of Chairman Mao on the White House tree. * It was you who curtailed the military tribunals of all Islamic terrorists. * It was you who refused to condemn the Ft. Hood killer as an Islamic terrorist. * It is you who has refused to speak-out concerning the horrific executions of women throughout the Muslim culture, but yet, have submitted Arizona to the UN for investigation of hypothetical human-rights abuses. * It was you who when queried in India refused to acknowledge the true extent of radical global Jihadists, and instead profusely praised Islam in a country that is 82% Hindu and the victim of numerous Islamic terrorists assaults. * It was you who funneled $900 Million in U.S. taxpayer dollars to Hamas. * It was you who ordered the United States Postal Service to honor the MUSLIM holiday with a new commemorative stamp. * It was you who directed our UK Embassy to conduct outreach to help "empower" the British Muslim community. * It was you who funded mandatory Arabic language and culture studies in Grammar schools across our country. * It is you who follows the Muslim custom of not wearing any form of jewelry during Ramadan. * It is you who departs for Hawaii over the Christmas season so as to avoid past criticism for NOT participating in seasonal White House religious events. * It was you who was uncharacteristically quick to join the chorus of the Muslim Brotherhood to depose Egypt's Hosni Mubarak, formerly America's strongest ally in North Africa; but, remain muted in your non-response to the Brotherhood led slaughter of Egyptian Christians. * It was you who appointed your chief adviser, Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian, who is a member of the Muslim Sisterhood, an off-shoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. It was you the whole time who ushered in this mess we are in!
English
@AEfterlife117 @kelseeynicoleee You are talking about the French version, right? The American remake just didn't have the same intensity.
English
@kelseeynicoleee I think martyrs was one of the most intense disturbing horror movies I've ever seen
English
@timeisnaked The reviews are fake. 95% on Rotten Tomatoes? As if...
English
Astroturfed reviews - 95% on Rotten Tomatoes, c'mon. And can someone turn on some f-ing lights? This trend of cinematic "darkness" is not edgy, it’s vapid. As for the film - misogyny wrapped in a bloody, bloated layer of incel nihilism is not clever. It’s sad and speaks poorly of where these young creative minds find themselves.
English
Two Facebook posts. One online mob. And no one could stop it.
English
“Articulate and Bright and Clean” retweetledi
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.
So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.
What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.
Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.
The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.
Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.
The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.
The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.
Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.
She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
English
BREAKING: James Talarico (D) is now favored to win the Texas Senate election
English
Look, the only correct take about watching Paul McCartney at 83 in 2026, on SNL no less, is that it’s a privilege to still witness him do this
Has anyone shaped music quite like him?
English
@TimelessTrvlr The problem is getting there. Everything about the journey to the hotel is third world. Sorry.
English
Cabo San Lucas is the kind of place where stress disappears the second you see the water.
English