7AM

2K posts

7AM banner
7AM

7AM

@7amLarb

One of the first prophets

Katılım Nisan 2017
558 Takip Edilen490 Takipçiler
一千万是只猫
一千万是只猫@RXu107·
🐾 Monad 上线一天后是否大于 4B?—— 今年最大的预测市场的跨平台信息不对等性机会! 大家可以看下猫猫我 Repost 的这篇文章 他提到了一个观点就是 “在昨天晚上9点,@Polymarket 上购买 Monad 大于4B 的 NO ” 是一个大机会 因为昨天在快结算尾盘的时候依旧有 35%-60% 且流动性充盈 但猫猫完全不同意这位老哥的看法!!!! 因为这个市场整体的规则写的非常非常模糊! 我们先来看看这个盘口的规则: “规则要求用 T+24 小时时段里“最具流动性的平台”作为结算依据” 这条模糊不清的规则导致了两个非常严重的问题: 1 时间问题: 主网在 11.24 的 9 EST 上线,CEX 在 10 EST 上线,中间差了整整 1 小时,以哪个时间为基准? 2 数据源问题: 没说清楚以哪家 CEX/ DEX 价格进行结算,只给了一个非常模糊的概念 “最具流动性的平台” 下图为 @coinbase@Official_Upbit 在结算时间段对应的 MON 价格 如果以 Coinbase 来结算的话,毫无疑问是 NO,但以 Upbit 价格来结算则达到了符合 Yes 的条件 在如此模糊不清的规则下,这也能解释了为什么没有 bot 来扫尾盘 另外这个盘口最迷惑的一步:在临近结算提案人突然加一句: “最具流动性的平台,参考 Coinbase” 这一句就很扯淡了,你前面 24 小时都没写 Coinbase,临了临了突然甩一句 “Coinbase 是流动性最好的平台” 更关键的点在于: “流动性最强”本身就是一个多维度的概念: 从 成交量(Volume) 来看: 根据历史数据,Coingecko 给出的全球现货分布里—— Upbit 的交易量占比 35.88%,而 Coinbase 只有 18.39%,那我们就要采用 Upbit 作为最具流动性参考吗? 但若以流动性指数(Liquidity Score) 来衡量: CoinMarketCap 的指标显示,Coinbase 的流动性评分为 636,高于 Upbit 的 511 在这一维度下,Coinbase 又显得更具“市场深度与撮合能力” 不同的流动性衡量方法会得出完全不同的结果。 而规则并未事先定义采用哪一种标准,使得“最具流动性的平台”这一条款在实际执行中无法客观落地 基于以上种种源于原因 导致 polymarket 社区对这个盘口判定结果依旧存在巨大分歧,所以导致此盘口已经被两次 dispute 了 而同一个盘口 @opinionlabsxyz 的规则就明显清晰的多 时间点明确:以任何dex/cex 代币流通后的24小时 数据源明确:以 CoinMarketCap 作为唯一数据源 也正因如此,昨日真正具有风险回报优势的并非 Polymarket 的Monad 4B NO 尾盘 而是在 @Polymarket 的因规则不确定性导致 NO 端出现集中抛售时,反向布局确定性的 @opinionlabsxyz 的 4B NO 因为按照 CMC 的公开数据,在结算前约 30 分钟的价格区间内,MON 的 FDV 全程未触及 4B,定价相对明确 在这里必须对 @ForrestOLAB@Nicki57457 所坚持的规则透明度标准表示尊重 在预测市场中,明确、可验证且不可随意变动的规则,才是整个系统可信赖的根本 结尾: 这一事件说明:预测市场在跨平台资交易,问题从来不在价格,而在于规则是否事前明确且可复现 Polymarket 的本次盘口的问题在于:未提前定义“流动性”应按哪项指标衡量,导致任何结算结果都可能被质疑 相比之下,@opinionlabsxyz 用统一时间点与单一数据源,给出了可验证的标准 最终,这起争议真正提醒我们的不是 YES 或 NO,而是: 预测市场必须建立在清晰而不可随意调整的规则之上,否则和合约市场的类 MMT /MYX 之徒的 Crime Coin 无异
一千万是只猫 tweet media一千万是只猫 tweet media一千万是只猫 tweet media一千万是只猫 tweet media
A Bao 阿饱 |🐬TermMax | MemeMax⚡️|🦅@smqclaske

讲一个昨晚出现的大机会 昨天晚上9点,polymarket @Polymarket 上 monad发币之后一天市值多少,我买的不到4b 因为lanch时间是24号晚上九点,结算之后价格一度在35%-60%之间徘徊 我在想明明结算了,为啥没bot扫尾盘?价格还这么高?又去研究了一下结算规则,coinbase的上架时间是9.30,lanch时间就是9点 疯狂WeChat按头朋友买no,没人相信我,,白送钱也没人要,说lanch时间是10点。。 我感觉这种机会会经常有,只要研究明白规则,就能找到确定性的机会 @PolymarketTrade 能给我个polymarket的后缀标么?我是polymarket的坚定支持者 Could you give me the suffix for "polymarket"? I'm a staunch supporter of polymarkets.thanks #polymarket #KAITO

中文
92
3
101
22.6K
大黄哥William
大黄哥William@huang_wanlin·
有人是看我帖子下单的吗!!?? 卧槽 KT 真的太牛逼了哈哈哈哈哈哈哈!!! 舒服了!感谢 KT!!感谢 Opinion!!! @opinionlabsxyz
大黄哥William tweet media
大黄哥William@huang_wanlin

Opinion 正确交易方法没你想象的复杂 作为一名在 OP 每日正常交易的用户,我最主要做的就是两减两增:减少交易频次,减少交易手续费,增加交易量,增加持仓时间。这几点基本就是与 Opinion Pts 最挂钩的几大特征。 减少交易频次+减少交易手续费=成本📉 增加交易量+增加持仓时间=Pts📈 Opinion 目前仅仅内测两周时间,日交易量基本已与Polymarket 和 Kalshi 持平。 本周的持仓量已从 5M 上涨到 45M,达到了 Polymarket 的 20%。这是极度夸张的这的增速,也意味着机会窗口在迅速收缩,一周比一周难上分。 预计下周全面开放后,将卷出新高度。 ▰▰▰▰▰▰▰ 今天的推文借鉴了@zohanlin 佐哥IP 课的 “HOOK” 和 “推文附图”,瞬间让贴图不在那么的“无趣”。 本来我寻思今天买Gen 赢,那其实也显得有点无趣了。想让比赛更有看点些。今年作为韩国队三号种子,但却一直有黑马之姿。S15 开赛以来保持着全胜的队伍,且在 LCK 季后赛时,KT 曾有击败 GEN 的记录。所以小买了一手,支持 KT,各位 DYOR 哦🫶 @opinionlabsxyz

中文
27
0
26
3.7K
Movez
Movez@0xMovez·
This is the type of founder you want to see behind your project. I'm very bullish on @opinionlabsxyz ! Today I had a bug with my balance on OpinionLabs, so I wrote a reply to @ForrestOLAB X about the issue and asked for help. I was really surprised when @ForrestOLAB personally contacted me in DMs and provided support. After the team fixed the error, he even followed up to ask if everything was solved. @ForrestOLAB reminds me of @chameleon_jeff - this is definitely the kind of founder you want leading your project. gOPINION
Movez tweet mediaMovez tweet mediaMovez tweet media
English
10
3
47
6.4K
幣圈小鯊
幣圈小鯊@0xSmallshark·
I want to join the Pioneer Program! Even though I didn’t get the invite code yet, I truly believe in what @opinionlabsxyz is building — a real, passionate, and creative community that values authenticity over hype. I love communities that reward genuine participation and loyalty, not just big accounts or loud voices. That’s why I want to become a Pioneer — to contribute, create, and help shape this prediction revolution together. Let’s make something meaningful, one honest conversation at a time
English
1
0
0
124
yieldfarming
yieldfarming@delucinator·
The Limitless guy is basically a solana memecoin founder
English
19
9
249
14.7K
Opinion ⁒
Opinion ⁒@opinionlabsxyz·
OPN Point Program Season 1 is LOCKED and LOADED
English
1.1K
569
1.1K
189.2K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🔥 CZ: If you have to beg an exchange to list, ask yourself who is providing value to whom. Work on your project, not other people.
Cointelegraph tweet media
English
573
272
2.2K
215.3K
7AM
7AM@7amLarb·
@bestshitcoin @Cointelegraph I'm not the one who complain about the fee and bring cartel into this fart brain 😂✌️
English
0
0
0
32
7AM
7AM@7amLarb·
@bestshitcoin @AAyenuyo @Cointelegraph Let's pump this token to the moon and then rug holder with no fees so we can create another token get free list wohooo Let's turn this CEX into Pump Fun version 2
English
3
0
5
45
7AM
7AM@7amLarb·
@wizw1z @cz_binance Major projects aren’t listed on some specific CEXs. For example, why doesn’t OKX list BNB? Nothing personal just move on
English
1
0
6
271
wiz
wiz@wizw1z·
@cz_binance Sooo....why haven't you listed HYPE?
English
5
1
183
6.6K
CZ 🔶 BNB
CZ 🔶 BNB@cz_binance·
Unpopular opinion post: On Listing "Fees" (saw this a few times recently) 1. If you are a project complaining about listing airdrops or "fees" (to users), Don't pay it. If your project is strong, exchanges will race to list your coin. If you have to beg an exchange to list, then... You need to ask yourself why, and who is providing value to whom. 2. If you complain about a competitor exchange's listing fees, then by all means, make your own listing fees 0, and be happy. In fact, why not set all your fees to 0? including trading fees? In a decentralized world, businesses are free to have their own business models. No one is forcing you to adopt a certain model. Focus on treating your users well. Don't focus on your competitors. 3. If you are a bag holder of a coin, complain to the project. Not the exchange. Or use a DEX. 4. PancakeSwap doesn't have listing fees, and has very good volumes. Further on this topic, exchanges adopt different listing models. 1. List everything on every blockchain. Most tokens are scams. Of the real "hard working" projects, most fail. Only a few projects will succeed. 2. Selectively list and make listing fee a revenue source. It's fine business model if you can attractive enough projects to list. Many small exchanges use this model, as they don't have enough trading fee revenue. 3. Selectively list. Ask for Airdrops to users. Security deposits, to make scams and failed projects more expensive to pull off. Protect users. These models are not black and white, and many exchanges adopt a combination of them between spot listing, futures listing, alpha listing, web3 wallet buys, etc. Work on your project, not other people. 🙏
Yazan 🇵🇸@YazanXBT

Why don’t you list #BNB then? Stop with the hypocrisy and double standards. Unless BNB (the third largest cryptocurrency by market cap) gets listed on Coinbase, your opinion of how another exchange should list cryptocurrencies is meaningless. Lead by example.

English
3.8K
977
7.2K
3.1M