OE Bisong

505 posts

OE Bisong

OE Bisong

@7thangelos

But in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished -Rev 10:7

Katılım Eylül 2018
346 Takip Edilen12 Takipçiler
Kingdom Heritage 📸
Kingdom Heritage 📸@KingdmHeritage·
@NSawyer45 A thing doesn't have to be heresy to be absolute nonsense. Augustine taught that sex for pleasure even in marriage is a sin Is that not absolute nonsense?
English
2
0
4
707
Joseph Opene
Joseph Opene@Joseph_opene·
@7thangelos Beautiful dashboards catch the eye, but solid data modelling keeps the business alive. Without good models, visuals are just pictures, not insight and can misled the business.
English
1
0
0
29
Joseph Opene
Joseph Opene@Joseph_opene·
One thing nobody tells you when you start working with Power BI: Sometimes when you get performance issues. The problem isn’t your DAX. It’s not your visuals. It’s the two tables sitting quietly in your model… connected with a 1:1 relationship… pretending everything is fine… when in reality, they are slowing down your entire report. Let me explain 1. The moment I realized the truth I once had a model with two tables: • Customer_Details • Customer_Profile Both had a perfect 1:1 relationship on Customer_ID. No duplicates. No many-to-many drama Everything “looked” clean. Until the report started dragging. DAX was slow. Filters lagged. Model size was bigger than expected. That’s when I realized: “If two tables have a true 1:1 relationship… combine them. You’re wasting engine resources keeping them separate.” It changed everything. 2. Why 1:1 tables should be merged (the technical truth) Power BI’s engine (VertiPaq) works best when: • Data is compressed • Tables are wide (not many tiny tables) • Relationships are minimized • Lookups are reduced • Cardinality is optimized When you split a naturally 1:1 dataset into two tables, VertiPaq must: • Maintain an extra relationship • Build an unnecessary dictionary • Handle additional lookups • Process extra table scans • Spend memory on structure instead of data You are literally paying a performance tax for two tables that should be 1 3. When you shouldnt merge them There are only three legitimate exceptions where separating 1:1 tables is correct: A. Row-Level Security (RLS) If one table is used to secure the other, keep them separate B. Different business domains E.g., Finance vs CRM - data ownership or governance reasons require them apart. C. Extremely large columns Sometimes storing large text columns in a separate table improves compression. If none of these apply… Merge the tables. You’ll instantly see performance gains. 4. The problem? Most people never check. They see two tables. They see the same key. They see “1 to 1.” They assume it’s fine. But a 1:1 relationship is basically your model whispering: “Please… just merge us.” 5. What happens after merging? The improvements are real: ✓ Faster filters ✓ Faster DAX ✓ Smaller model size ✓ Fewer relationships ✓ Cleaner star schema ✓ Simpler lineage ✓ Lower cardinality across joins ✓ Better compression This isn't theory. This is VertiPaq physics. 6. The real message You don’t optimize Power BI by writing complex DAX. You optimize it by building a model the engine doesn’t have to fight. If two tables are truly 1:1… don’t leave them separated because they “look neat.” Combine them. Your model will thank you. #DataAnalytics #PowerBI #Excel #DataModelling #Optimisation
Joseph Opene tweet media
English
3
10
57
2.4K
Tamunoibim
Tamunoibim@n__nwachukwu·
@PresidentFums Thank you. It's more the glamour around the act than the act itself. I don't consider it wise at all.
English
1
0
1
247
Thandiwe
Thandiwe@PresidentFums·
I personally don’t think it’s wrong for a pastor to get a tattoo. My only reservation is that no matter the message, it is not something to be publicised or sensationalised especially because of the believers with a weaker conscience.
English
9
7
52
3.7K
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@AbrahamOlawunmi Even in a fully taught, fully saved assembly, Paul still commands silence where there is no interpretation. Maturity, in Paul’s framework, results in restraint and not exemption.
English
0
0
2
50
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@AbrahamOlawunmi Paul’s governing concern in 1 Corinthians 14 is the edification of the church, not the sensibilities of unbelievers. The unbeliever example strengthens the argument, but it does not create it.
English
1
0
2
56
Olawunmi Abraham
Olawunmi Abraham@AbrahamOlawunmi·
Paul said that because of the unsaved and unlearned who might come into our midst, we must have interpretation alongside tongues.. This means,a saved man who is properly taught WILL HAVE NO ISSUES, if he comes into an assembly where everyone speaks in tongues..
English
1
11
38
1.2K
Karan🧋
Karan🧋@kmeanskaran·
Note: This approach is not applicable if you are still learning. This will backfire on you. Basics, basics, basics, just the basics for you.
English
3
0
12
657
Karan🧋
Karan🧋@kmeanskaran·
For the past 4–5 months, I have completely changed my approach to machine learning. I stopped learning everything and digging deep into tensors and research papers. I now use whatever tools are available to code and focus on business impact and deadlines. Thats it!
English
17
2
129
5.1K
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@Mmesomavic70353 Get born again and be filled with the Spirit. You will experience what it truly means to be "cracked". Moving in the power of an endless life. Nothing else would satisfy.
English
0
0
0
35
Mmesoma 🦋
Mmesoma 🦋@Mmesomavic70353·
I need to be cracked so bad 😔
English
130
745
3.3K
264.5K
Bunmi 👓
Bunmi 👓@oadefisayo·
Who wants to read “On the Incarnation” on a Twitter Space?
English
7
0
16
1.1K
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@RuralEvangelist Amen. If it's not rural it's not rugged and if it's not rugged it's not rural.
English
0
1
2
76
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@_DeraIJ Microsoft hasn't changed those icons. I don't think it's a glitch.
English
0
0
0
566
Dera | Power BI Developer 💛✨
Every time I open my laptop, I feel the urge to close it 😭… but here I am, locking in. How’s your day going joor?😊
Dera | Power BI Developer 💛✨ tweet media
English
6
0
33
1.3K
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@_ebelechukwu I think you meant to say: "If you don't believe in every miracle claim you are not a Christian" because "Christians who don’t believe in miracles" is NOT a thing.
English
0
0
0
22
Ebelechukwu
Ebelechukwu@_ebelechukwu·
Let me tell you a funny joke. Christians who don’t believe in miracles
English
62
186
786
51.8K
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@lekan_olayinka1 For the sake of credibility and intellectual honesty, retraction and republication is usually the cleaner approach. Just my two cents.
English
0
0
2
92
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@lekan_olayinka1 I’d suggest taking it down, removing the incorrect attribution, and reposting a corrected version. Even if the argument itself stands, leaving a post with a known false citation risks misleading others now or in the future.
English
1
0
4
679
Lekan Olayinka
Lekan Olayinka@lekan_olayinka1·
I need to address something regarding this post, which I should have done yesterday. A quote I attributed to Gordon Fee, the first one, was not actually said by him. Some have therefore accused me of falsifying a quote to support my position. That is not what happened. When I write, I sometimes submit my drafts to artificial intelligence for theological critique, specifically to test strengths and weaknesses and to cross-check against historical and modern scholarship. I did that with this post yesterday and, in its critique, the AI generated those quotations of modern scholarship across church history. That particular quote was an AI hallucination. Moh asked why I have not deleted the post. I have not because the argument itself stands, whether or not Fee is cited. In fact, my conclusion that tongues function as a language of worship was reached independently through my own exegesis a day earlier. I argued that tongues operate in prayer, thanksgiving, and song, activities that are intentional, and therefore can be willfully engaged. Interestingly, scholars like Fee and others do, in substance, agree with that conclusion, even if that specific quote was inaccurate. The responsibility I take is not addressing the citation error issue sooner. My attempt to be more precise made me vulnerable to an AI limitation. I have since developed a better method for using AI in research without falling into this problem again.
Lekan Olayinka@lekan_olayinka1

I mentioned this during the Space. We can engage the gift of tongues willfully in the domain of prayer. This is because tongues is a verbal gift given to the believer so that he may worship God through it. Gordon Fee agrees. I hate to quote scholars because the texts speak for themselves. But let's hear Fee: “Paul’s language assumes that glossolalia can be initiated and terminated at will.” That is why Paul says: “I WILL sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.” (1 Corinthians 14:15) He also says: “Otherwise, if YOU give thanks with the spirit, how can anyone in the position of an outsider say ‘Amen’…?” (1 Corinthians 14:16) And earlier he states plainly: “I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also.” (1 Corinthians 14:15) So Paul linked tongues to: Prayer Singing Thanksgiving Paul speaks this way because he possessed the gift, and it is in the very nature of the gift to be engaged willfully. Scripture presents tongues as one of the means by which we worship God, through prayer, singing, and thanksgiving. These three are not optional; they are commands we are to practice intentionally, consistently, and willfully. Most scholars agree tongues is worship speech. Craig S. Keener “In 1 Corinthians 14, tongues are addressed to God and function as prayer or praise.” Max Turner “Tongues function primarily as prayer and praise rather than as revelation for others.” Gordon D. Fee “It is clear that speaking in tongues is prayer or praise directed to God.” “What is spoken in tongues is addressed to God and is therefore a form of worship, not instruction.” Anthony C. Thiselton “Glossolalia is not speech addressed to other human beings but prayer or praise addressed to God.” This distinguishes tongues from other gifts, such as prophecy, healing, faith, and miracles. These are primarily exercised horizontally, that is, toward other believers. Tongues, however, is unique in that it can operate both horizontally (to edify the church when interpreted) and vertically (directed to God). We cannot prophesy to God. What could we reveal to Him that He has not already revealed to us? But Scripture does say: “For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God… he utters mysteries in the Spirit.” (1 Corinthians 14:2) In conclusion, by God’s sovereign design, the very nature of the gift of tongues is that it can be used in prayer as worship toward Him. That is why Paul says he will pray in the Spirit. Therefore, for the believer who has received the gift of tongues, it is entirely biblical to use it in prayer—uttering mysteries to God. This is precisely what Arome was saying here. Gordon Fee says it can be willfully initiated and terminated. Arome says the same. Only that Arome says when you pray in tongues, you maximise the investment of the holy spirit in you. Which makes more spiritually pragmatic sense.

English
1
2
33
9K
Kunle Kenny -The Joy Dispenser
Kunle Kenny -The Joy Dispenser@kunle_kenny·
An atheist was arguing with me on this same Twitter. I gave the person accurate Words of Knowledge. Argument ended. It now became a case of “do you want to surrender your heart to Jesus or not?” If you like, let people talk you out of spirituals with intellectual gibberish. Your Christianity is BOTH FRUIT AND GIFT. Desire EVERY GIFT! COVET THEM!
English
50
219
1.5K
42.3K
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@LawalOlaju16577 @the_janetnoah It's generally not, though I understand that opportunities might be limited because of your location. However, you can easily pivot to bioinformatics, comp bio and tech if you're interested.
English
1
0
1
49
Lawal Olajumoke
Lawal Olajumoke@LawalOlaju16577·
@the_janetnoah Yesss, pleaseeee. I do, Big J. 😩 I'm regretting studying MCB to be honest and I really want to ditch that narrative that's it's a bad course to be studied in Nigeria. 😩 I'd really appreciate it. Thank youuuu so muchhhh for being amazing, Big J. 🥹
English
2
0
5
819
Lawal Olajumoke
Lawal Olajumoke@LawalOlaju16577·
Pleaseeee, if you studied Microbiology and you're actually building a solid career with it. Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeee, come outsideeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!! 🥹
English
6
4
119
8.2K
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@Baby_Beedee Whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.
English
0
0
9
822
OE Bisong
OE Bisong@7thangelos·
@jhonforchrist It is not, yet you can't avoid the "fact", and I'm using fact here to mean general perception, that most reformed people are cessationist.
English
0
0
0
36
Worm.
Worm.@jhonforchrist·
I hate the way people make it as though Reformed is a direct opposite to Pentecostal.
English
1
0
5
391