JordanJones

@VikChatterjee @ConceptualJames @christopherrufo It doesn't though. It means they are Postmodern (beleive power creates realty) have Critical Consciousness and use Critical Theory. The Soviet's were not SJW's but they were Woke.

@christopherrufo may have failed there but I can do better. The term "woke right" is inaccurate because the term "woke" implies that the person is an SJW. "Woke right" people are not SJWs, whatever they are. The similarities between these groups is superficial and not one of principle.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Nearly a year ago, I sat down for a long-form interview with John Stossel about the emergence of the Woke Right. At the time, almost nobody got it. This week, I've received dozens of texts from people who just saw the interview and found it clarifying.

An old favorite.

This picture is blatantly cruel Carrie takes a smiling selfie with Candace —who’s actively slandering Charlie’s wife. Then she uses Charlie’s own words as the caption for the picture. And Joe Kent is in the picture, after being on Tucker’s podcast, using Charlie’s name to float Israel/Iran assassination theories for clout. Three people all exploiting Charlie’s name in completely different ways. Gross.

@OxBazaar @elonmusk @DannyLimanseta No. I beleive this is the base reality built by the necessary "consciousness outside of chain." This is the "Infinite Regress Problem" in philosophy. In my opinion, the creator of the Sim is God and the Sim is the Universe.

@84JordanJones @elonmusk @DannyLimanseta But you would agree this cannot be the base reality.

I had dinner once with a top physicist and a top computer scientist and asked what they thought the probability was that we were in a simulation. They answered simultaneously at 0% and 100% respectively. It was like a double-slit experiment, but with humans.

@Jacobdreams @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP Exactly. What you are referring to in the "Infinite Regress Problem" is the "Necessary Consciousness outside of the Chain". God created and runs the Sim, the Sim is the Universe.

@84JordanJones @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP Not if there is a God who is observing all things thus making us particles. But really we are just waves of energy at our core.

🚨 Simulation Theory: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles. What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to Simulation Theory. Are we in a sim? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of existence! The Why Files video did a great job on explaining the Double Slit Experiment & Simulation Theory What do YOU think—real or rendered? Drop your thoughts below!

@NetsphereOb @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP I understand know. It was just the way you used dimensions. Solid point, apologies. In the "Infinite Regress Problem" you are talking about the "Necessary Consciousness Outside of the Chain". A force above the laws of the Universe. I call that God personally. God run the Sim

@84JordanJones @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP Ok so lets be a little retarded ok, Humans can effect on our own, and lower dimensions right? Why cant an entity on a dimension higher than "time" do the same? Just because its slightly incompreheible doesnt invalidate it right?

@dustoff2329 @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP If you're referring to the Sim as a tailored universe, why and how is the Universe there to begin with? In the "infinite regress problem" you are falling at Brute hurdle. Well it exists because it does. The question remains unanswered.

@84JordanJones @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP I think it's fundamentally different from something like the big bang where Consciousness and Human Experience is treated as an Epiphenomenon or accidental side effect of physics. Instead you have a universe tailored to Human Experience which is a totally different paradigm.

@NetsphereOb @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP I'm not. You're confused, that isn't the point.

@84JordanJones @nvztergun @InterstellarUAP "how can something come from nothing before time exists and so on." We exist in the 3rd dimension. Some believe time is the 4th, we can observe the 2nd, why are you against "higher" dimensions existing?

@nvztergun @InterstellarUAP Nevzat is right! This is the classic "infinite-regress problem" in philosophy. The Sim provides zero answers just like the Big Bang. Neither of them can explain what came before, how can something come from nothing before time exists and so on. Sim Theory is retarded

@InterstellarUAP So if this is a simulation, who is running it?

@elonmusk @DannyLimanseta Simulation Theory present a problem equal to not knowing if you are in one. Who simulates the simulated? Who created the Simulators? All the way down back to base reality with zero explanation. God runs the Simulation. Not Humans.

@DannyLimanseta For the same reason we run simulations: to observe interesting outcomes. That’s why the most interesting outcome, especially if ironically entertaining, is the most likely: all the boring simulations were terminated.

Over the past several weeks, Carrie Prejean Boller has complained that she was removed from the Presidential Commission on Religious Liberty because of her Catholic beliefs, and she has called out myself and other Catholic members of the commission for not defending her. This is absurd. Mrs. Prejean Boller was not dismissed for her religious convictions but rather for her behavior at a gathering of the Commission last month: browbeating witnesses, aggressively asserting her point of view, hijacking the meeting for her own political purposes. The Catholic position on matters of “Zionism,” to which I fully subscribe, is as follows: all forms of antisemitism are to be unequivocally condemned; the state of Israel has a right to exist; but the modern nation of Israel does not represent the fulfillment of Biblical prophecies and hence does not stand beyond criticism. If Mrs. Prejean Boller were dismissed for holding these beliefs, it is difficult to understand why I am still a member of the Commission. To paint herself as a victim of anti-Catholic prejudice or to claim that her religious liberty has been denied is simply preposterous.

Credit where it's due: Tucker is amazing at confidently delivering absolute lies. Here he is claiming that Churchill locked up members of the opposition party during WW2. When, in fact, Churchill led a National Government, i.e. one that INCLUDED leaders of the opposition parties in prominent roles. Labour leader Clement Atlee was appointed Churchill's Deputy and other leading Labour and Liberal politicians held major roles in the cabinet. The person Tucker is talking about is Oswald Mosley who was the leader of the British Union of Fascists and was not elected to anything. He wanted Britain to become a fascist country and work with Hitler. Despite this, contrary to Tucker's claims, he was not even detained for the full duration of the war and was released in 1943, two years before it ended. In most other countries he would have been hanged for treason without a second thought the day the war started. Britain's treatment of this tiny group of fascists, i.e. enemy sympathisers and collaborators, during WW2 is an example of extraordinary restraint and respect for the sanctity of human life and freedom that was not only unparalleled in the world at that time but arguably remains rare and hugely admirable even by the standards of today across most of the world. In short, Tucker is completely wrong and we can only conclude that the spreading of these malicious lies is motivated not only by his ignorance of history but also by the fact that he will say ANYTHING he deems necessary to suit his political agenda. His opposition to the current war in Iran, about which I myself have expressed some skepticism, does not justify this behaviour and is, in fact, undermined by it - no right- thinking person can take him seriously after this.

Listen you human piece of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. First, it wasn't his office's job to do the investigation, so that's just salacious trash that should be condemned totally, not promoted like it's "news." Now, Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.

This. Wow. At the 1978 Oscars, Vanessa Redgrave used her acceptance speech to attack Jews using the term "Zionist hoodlums”. Just after, Paddy Chayefsky, WWII veteran, takes the stage after winning an Oscar for “Network” Listen to what he has to say..

And meanwhile, Trump makes his views on many things very clear.

Let's get some perspective. The Woke Right is not a reaction to the Woke Left; it is the CONTINUATION of the Woke Left into conservative institutions. The Long March Through the Institutions effectively hit its Leftist limit by maybe 2022 or so at the latest. Leftists had taken or destroyed every institution they actually could take or destroy by then, more or less. And there was massive pushback from conservative institutions that weren't just based but getting organized quickly and effectively. The Long March Through the Institutions had to continue INTO conservative institutions (mostly faith and family, into any remaining honest "Alt Media," together with the more solid wings of the Republican Party and the sectors of the right-wing think tank world that repelled it). The Long March Through the Institutions has to march into EVERY institution, not just ones that are easy pickings for Leftist intellectuals and bureaucrat types, plus kids. What does the Long March Through the Institutions do? One of two things. It runs entryist programming to get inside established institutions and to turn them to the revolutionary cause or, when it cannot do this, destroys them. The mechanism is internal infection plus external pressure almost every time. So the Long March Through the Institutions ran as far as it could run into Left-susceptible institutions by 2022 at the latest, and it was mostly repelled by Right-standing institutions. But the Long March Through the Institutions had to continue into EVERY institution to truly transform society. There can be no remaining solid resistance. Of course, the Long March Through the Institutions tried Left-coded infiltration and destruction of Right-standing institutions, probably most obviously and notably the Southern Baptist Convention and some of the other major Protestant national denominations. MLK50, Resolution 9 (SBC-2019), and much else (seminary appointments, podcasts, leadership, TGC, T4G from the mid-2000s to almost 2022, e.g.). But ultimately it failed. It was blocked. (Catholicism, Anglicanism, etc., fared a lot more poorly in resisting Woke Left infiltration, as we all saw and can still see.) To continue the Long March Through the Institutions after 2022 required something different: finding a way to turn Right-standing institutions into Right-susceptible ones and to provide them with a mutated Woke virus that could infect their institutions. The goal didn't change: get inside the institution and take over or, if that's impossible, destroy it with a combination of internal rot and external pressure. Woke Right is that mutated infection, and it shows up as Wokeness cloaked in the language of faith and patriotism ("Christian Nationalism," "Christ is King," "America First") in order to infiltrate Right-susceptible institutions. It speaks to grievance, frustration, love of country, and hope. It plays upon the deep distrust and suspicion these institutions have for "official" narratives and manipulates their distrust, dislike, and disdain for Leftism of all stripes. That is, it shows up as Reaction. But it isn't even Reaction. It's simulated Reaction. It's hyperreal Reaction. It's Reaction in pastiche. It's the Reaction a Leftist would formulate in a lab somewhere and unleash on conservatives. That is, Woke Right is not actually Reaction at all (dumb as Reaction is). It is THE ACTIVE CONTINUATION OF WOKE LEFT IN RIGHT-WING CLOTHING. It was always the next thing once the Left's march through institutions and identity categories hit a wall. It runs the same playbooks using many of the same people, for example. It has the same formula: black identity politics, meet white identity politics; female identity politics, meet male identity politics; gay identity politics, meet straight identity politics; atheist identity politics, meet Christian identity politics (but we'll call it all "Jewish"). It was always going to be the next move when either or both of these conditions were met: 1) Leftist advances went as far as they could into Left-susceptible institutions; 2) Real and effective pushback arose in authentic conservative spaces. The goal of Woke Right is to take the Long March Through the Institutions into Right-susceptible institutions to infect them and make them useless in the real fight against the Left, if not causes for the Left's resurgence (this strategy is called "l/acc," Left Accelerationism). Whatever it can't capture, it will destroy. The bonus for this phase of the Long March Through the (Conservative) Institutions is that taking over an institution is destroying it. If you turn an institution openly racist, fascist, Nazi, etc., that is, if you "f-ck and impregnate it with Groyperism," for one example, you ultimately ruin it. It might have a short and wild run for a little while, but it won't just be destroyed sooner than people think; it will be DESTROYED FOREVER in abominable and lasting shame. Heritage Foundation is at the knife's edge of being completely cooked now after almost 50 years. TPUSA teeters on the brink after everything Charlie Kirk poured into building it. College Republicans, which will all bleed over into the Republican Party by name association, has a very narrow window remaining to save its reputation. And when this all gets seen properly in the public, and the public turns on this rot for real, as it will, those institutions will not have a comeback arc. There's no comeback arc available to those views once society sobers up and the psyop calms down or moves on. I could (and should) go on, but I won't. You need to understand what's actually happening here. You need to understand that "Woke Right" and "Christian Nationalism" and all this garbage is just the next part of the plan to ruin us that was deployed specifically because we were succeeding, and it was always set to be deployed this way when we got there. If you think I "changed" or "went crazy" back around 2022 or so, it's because that's when I started to understand this simple fact. They were creating the "Christian Nationalist" movement and reinvigorating the Alt Right to take the Long March Through the Institutions to the Right and destroy us all from within because we were going to win.

Addressing Zoomerslop. A real Gen Z quote: "Of all my friends, Israel is the very first thing that they want to learn about and understand, because it does go back to America First. I, in fact, have not talked to one Gen Z conservative that has been pro-Israel. Everybody I've talked to is questioning Israel." Listen, kids. Doesn't that seem really f--king weird to you? The main thing your whole cohort cares about is another country, one that is allied with us and kicking ass in the most Top Gun way you can imagine? Doesn't it seem weird that everyone in your generation is focused on another country that isn't even attacking us? It should seem weird because it is weird. The reason it's happening is not because Israel is relevant to all of your lives. The reason it is happening is because you're being propagandized. Let me repeat the quote in words that hit your big brothers and sisters right in the assholes ten years ago: "Of all my friends, privilege is the very first thing that they want to learn about and understand, because it does go back to Social Justice. I, in fact, have not talked to one Millennial liberal that doesn't question our privilege. Everybody I've talked to is questioning privilege: white privilege, male privilege, straight privilege." Do you think that was normal? No, it wasn't normal either. Every Gen X or older person can tell you that the young people in their generations had many, varied, and diverse interests. There was no top of mind for everyone in a generation. But the Millennials got it with privilege and Social Justice, and you're getting it with Israel and "America First." Kids, listen to me. This is not normal. This is not natural. This is the result of dedicated propaganda campaigns. You are being propagandized. The method of propaganda being used is primarily something called "reflexivity," which is a method developed by George Soros to create mass movements of belief around deliberate lies that he called "fertile fallacies." He called them "fertile fallacies" because they are lies (fallacies, errors, differences between what's believed and what's really true) that can take off (fertile) in a population. They're "lies with legs," it has been said. The method of "reflexivity" is to get everyone believing the same erroneous stuff in an increasing way at the same time. This is accomplished through local media saturation: everyone is talking about the same thing in the same way at the same time, and eventually so are your friends. Then the ideas "reflect" all around you creating a sense of social consensus and widespread belief. Reflexive campaigns are everywhere now. On the Left, we call them the "Current Thing." We have rafts of memes of the NPCs all changing their tune or saying the same thing or being reprogrammed or being hypnotized into the newest Current Thing, which changes when the media does. That's you! Now! You're being Sorosed! The reason everyone in your generation is suddenly talking about Israel is because propagandists in your midst have made Israel your "current thing." It is a reflexive campaign, and you aren't just a victim but are playing your part. The framing for that reflexive campaign is "America First." The propagandists are exploiting your love of country and frustration with bad actors in our governments and their "global partners," which are increasingly being exposed, to get you attached to a bunch of fertile fallacies about Israel, all of which play upon your fears, anxieties, frustrations, and love for your beautiful country. Here are some: "Israel is not really our greatest ally. It isn't even an ally." "We can't afford things at home because Israel gets aid money." "This is Israel's War, and I'm not dying in Israel's War." "Israel attacked the USS Liberty and isn't our friend." "Jeffrey Epstein was working with Israel." "Israel is too weak to exist on its own so it manipulates America into supporting it." "Israel is a settler-colonialist project that is doing a genocide of the indigenous Palestinians." (OOPS MY BAD THAT'S THE ONE THEY'RE TELLING YOUR FRIENDS ON THE LEFT) "Israel is a warmongering vassal state under with US protectorate status that is seeking to become a regional power by starting random wars that it drags the US into and doing genocide." (AHH THAT'S YOUR VERSION OF THE SAME LIE!) None of these (or dozens more) is accurate. They are all fallacies (lies) designed to take off in the social and emotional environments you find yourselves in, driven by media and political propagandists who have their own agendas but need your help (just like the NPCs on the Left). The reason you are so obsessed (and, yes, that's obsession) with Israel is because you are being targeted by reflexive propaganda campaigns designed to make you all fixate on this object that can be alleged to cause most of your problems. In fact, it causes few, if any, of your problems and is actively solving many problems you are blessed enough not to even know that you have. Friends, you are being propagandized. You are being led to focus and fixate on these things because it serves dark interests that are not your own. The same Soros techniques that work on the Left are being used on you, and you're helping them work. How do you stop them? 1) Stop listening to propagandists. This is actually really important. 2) Seek out the opposite side of what you're being told and try to understand the truth. 3) Use critical thinking. 4) Ask yourself if you're being asked to think about issues or asked to feel about issues. 5) Be skeptical of something that appears suddenly in the news or on platforms that everyone is repeating all the time all at once. That's how Soros's reflexivity works. 6) Understand, just like how it was true with CNN and other trusted news sources, that trusted sources can be bought, at which point they are not trustworthy anymore and are using your trust to manipulate you. The biggest anti-America operation that's happening right now is the sudden skeptical-to-hostile fixation on Israel. Notice that it's only been a thing since October 7, 2023, exactly the same time the parallel propaganda wave began on the Left. What you're participating in is the side of that same campaign tailored to your values, your anxieties, and your frustrations. No different. This campaign is rapidly turning people against not just Israel and often Jews (against your values, I'm sure), but against MAGA, Trump, the United States and its role in the world, and the Republican Party. Who benefits from that? Not you. Not us. Isn't it weird to you that so many people suddenly believe exactly the opposite of what they believed in 2022? Isn't it weird to you that everyone considers this such a big issue? It should be weird because it is. That's the signature of a propaganda campaign, and you are its primary targets.

I hope you'll watch my episode of the Darkhorse Podcast where I debate Bret Weinstein and Mike Nayna about the Woke Right.

This is how close Konstantin Kisin came to being assassinated during his debate with Destiny. It looks like this guy has now nuked his channel. @DigitalGnosis