auto-pilot
9.6K posts

auto-pilot
@947b1f
lurker, veteran deleuzian, dark souls philosopher


In America, a stranger will rename you in a single breath, and you are simply expected to come when called. I went to eat at a busy restaurant. A young man at the front asked for my name, to mark my place in line. I gave it the weight it has carried for eight hundred years. "Nobunaga." He smiled, nodded, and wrote it down with great confidence. Then he read it back to me, to be sure he had honored it correctly. "Perfect. Banana, party of one." Banana. He had heard my name, held it a moment, and returned to me something rounder and more cheerful. To refuse the name a host gives is to refuse his welcome. I bowed. I was Banana now. Then he handed me a small black disc, said it would "light up and buzz" when my table was ready, and turned to the next guest as though he had not just placed a living thing in my hands. I held it in both palms, the way one holds a small sleeping beast that may wake. I found a place to stand. I waited, ready. It woke. It screamed. It flashed red. It leapt and shook in my hands like a captured spirit demanding release. A lesser man would have dropped it. I did not. I gripped it, steady, looked into its blinking lights, and told it, in a low voice, that its time had come. Then I carried it back to the host with both hands, the way one returns a hawk to its master. He took it without looking and shouted across the entire room. "BANANA! Party of one, your table's ready!" A hundred strangers turned. I rose. I crossed that floor as Banana, spine straight, chin level, a man answering to his name. A child pointed at me. I gave the child a small bow. He had recognized me. All through the meal they kept me. "How's it tasting, Banana?" "More water, Banana?" The check, when it came, said Banana, and thanked me for visiting. By the end the whole staff knew me. They waved as I left. "Night, Banana!" So tell me honestly. For eight hundred years my clan answered to one name. Tonight I answered to a fruit, calmed a screaming relic in my bare hands, and ate among people who were glad I came. When the little disc lights up, is the table truly mine, or am I only keeping it warm for the next Banana? Because I have already decided to return on Friday, and to ask, very humbly, for the same disc.





Neema Parvini built a career explaining why organized minorities always beat disorganized majorities, then lost a public beef to a single guy having fun on the internet. Let that sit. He wrote a 150-page book condensing Mosca, Pareto, Michels, Schmitt, de Jouvenel, Burnham, Francis and Gottfried into plain English. The reviews called it an "accessible handbook" and a "companion volume" to Burnham's Machiavellians. A handbook. A companion. The words people use to describe a study guide. That he built a following off this says more about his audience than his thinking. The real question is whether he ever engaged the actual literature of elite formation. Not the sociology of who rules, but the cultivated arts of men capable of ruling. Castiglione laid out the full program in 1528. Gracián went further in 1647, three hundred maxims on discretion, timing and reputation management, the kind of thing Schopenhauer kept on his desk. Before either of them there was Plutarch, whose Lives the old public schools assigned not as history but as a formation manual. How character sustains or destroys a man under pressure. These are what old families quietly hand down. Eton was not built to produce scholars. It was built to produce governors. Academic Agent never got there. He described the board without understanding what it takes to be worth seating at the table. The @captive_dreamer situation exposed everything in real time. The pattern from AA was always the same: a man who spent years explaining elite theory getting systematically outmaneuvered by someone who actually understood what the theory was for. Captive Dreamer played the game. Academic Agent thought explaining the game entitled him to win it. That is the core of every one of his crashouts. He genuinely believed that translating Mosca and Pareto for a YouTube audience should have conferred on him some elevated status within the dissident right. That the work of summarizing should have been met with deference. Castiglione would have laughed. Gracián would have written a maxim about him. The entire tradition he was popularizing exists to make the opposite point: status is demonstrated through conduct under pressure, not claimed through proximity to difficult books. Every time someone refused to grant him the position he felt he had earned, he collapsed publicly. Not strategically. Not with any of the composure the literature he was selling demands. Just a man who mistook the map for the territory and then raged at the terrain for being wrong. The audience that keeps patronizing him after watching this repeatedly is telling on itself. What they want is not elite theory. What they want is the comfort of feeling like they understand power without having to do anything with that understanding. Academic Agent was the perfect vehicle for that because he modeled exactly the same thing: consumption of ideas as a substitute for action, with status claims attached. The dissident right has a serious problem with men who have read a great deal and built nothing, and its continued support for Academic Agent after these episodes suggests it has not yet noticed. Captive Dreamer noticed. That is why it bothered AA so much. His exit is not stoic withdrawal. Pareto's framework is built around the observation that declining elites retreat into moralizing when they can no longer compete. AA taught that lesson for years. Now he's living it, and he doesn't have the range to see it. Nobody who matters cares about him leaving.


Police are getting hunted down on the streets of Southampton tonight. Truly shocking scenes.


Jane Jacobs identified exactly this sentiment as a great destroyer of urban life. Cities aren’t works of art, they aren’t “the product of a single unifying vision.” Artists and architects are little tyrants that want to make cities into lifeless sculptures. Cities are organisms.


JD Vance killed the Woke Pope, only for a new, Woker Pope to take his place






It surprises me that BAP takes such a categorical position here, one based on the fallacy that a WOMAN could somehow also not be a CALCULATING WHORE. I thought he was Nietzschean. To me this looks like a Schopenhauerian error, the same one Michel Houellebecq often makes in his novels. It is the mistake of many incels and trads as well. It underlies the repulsive Christian TRAD discourse that BAP himself so often attacks. A WOMAN IS AT ALL TIMES A WHORE and at all times playing a role. She does not do this out of free will, but from archetypes that culture teaches her. It is the learned cultural role she performs that enables her to spread her legs, that makes her WANT and NEED to do so. And attached to those roles are different types of men, each neatly performing his own role as well. The Friends With Benefits man, or the man you marry and have children with. Some men are capable of playing several roles, either simultaneously or over time. This is the man's problem, not the woman's. The man in Jini's example feels insulted and castrated because he would rather be the conqueror than the man you marry, yet he never took responsibility for playing the male role that women want for a one night stand. He has it in his head that one role is more honorable than the other. The woman believed she was confiding something BEAUTIFUL to him. After all, it is her ACHIEVEMENT that she plays the role of married woman so well with her husband, fucking him, sucking him off, while occasionally still thinking back to experiences from earlier roles. Out of nostalgia, she shares those memories with her hubbie, her husband, her best friend, for whom she also spreads her legs. Does a man have any idea what psycho-biological-cultural gymnastics a libtard female brain has to perform to make that work in the free West, where rape is taboo and consent and desire occupy the highest place of honor? @Jinijane is right here. This woman does not know what she is talking about, and neither does the man. They should therefore not take each other too seriously. They are speaking to each other as symptoms. My own wife and whore explains all of this better than I do in this clip, in which she compares the Liberal Woman to the Victorian Woman and explains how we should TRAIN OUR WOMEN through Nietzschean Artist Metaphysics. I'm urging anyone who takes this fertility cult discourse seriously to study this clip, because it contains important clues about how such a fertility cult would actually have to be built. In the end, it has to be designed with the female mind in mind as well.





What a gay ass dev team bro.

My wild guess is that Theil, JD Vance, and so forth have access to internal polling which suggests an immanent liberal landslide and the complete collapse of the "New Right" project, with the likely jailing of many top figures. At least that is what *they* believe.










