xmail.box

596 posts

xmail.box banner
xmail.box

xmail.box

@9560_crypto

Supermassive black hole at the center of M87

Katılım Eylül 2021
384 Takip Edilen45 Takipçiler
xmail.box retweetledi
OpenSea
OpenSea@opensea·
OpenSea has evolved. Beta complete. Full token universe unlocked. New rewards program live. Welcome to the new OpenSea — the best place to discover, own, and trade anything onchain.
English
14.6K
160.8K
177.6K
4.8M
xmail.box retweetledi
My.box ⬡
My.box ⬡@boxdomains·
1/ As we near 1yr since the launch of .box, let's celebrate! We'll look back on our highlights from the year. Drop our biggest pricing promo yet. And give away 10 domains to 10 lucky winners. Read on:
English
5
49
127
11.9K
Hanzo ㊗️
Hanzo ㊗️@DeFi_Hanzo·
Sent the first rewards to 3 random wallets from my 0.5 $BTC giveaway. Wanted to send to another 2 but found out they are not followed. Still have 7 spots for the giveaway but make sure you: Like, Repost, drop your $SOL wallet below, and follow me. It is that simple.
Hanzo ㊗️ tweet media
English
841
579
752
78K
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@DeFi_Hanzo pls bro🙏 3oXkCoD3c7ykU1Eercvksug1izhqheZ4tKfWcCundUYL
Filipino
1
0
2
65
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@solclaimx 3oXkCoD3c7ykU1Eercvksug1izhqheZ4tKfWcCundUYL
Indonesia
0
0
0
6
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@Phantom_no01 🤣🤣 Ultimately, this is their level of competence. I will never entrust my important funds to them again. I would prefer to use a bridge protocol with a team of otherwise great personalities, even if the fees are a little higher. @PrimordialAA
English
1
0
1
57
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@PrimordialAA @0x00_1111 @0xfrypan @LayerZero_Labs My address was excluded due to a false positive, even though the submitted report was neither definitive nor effective. What will you do about the real users inconvenienced by this false positive? How long will you keep avoiding inconvenient truths?
English
0
0
0
43
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
If i reported every single address this would be true no? I’d overlap with every valid address. Overlapping is not enough, because it’s trivial to get overlapping addresses. A report had to be valid and conclusive, you could have come to a valid conclusion without conclusive methodology for reviewer to rule it as a valid report. Valid and conclusive were laid out as the requirement
English
8
0
0
1.1K
0xFrypan
0xFrypan@0xfrypan·
Here are some statistics on on @LayerZero_Labs 's bounty hunter reward distribution. @PrimordialAA There are 450+ hunters who paid 0.5 ETH and submitted 3000+ reports. Only 208 hunter received reward and 703 reports are listed on the provisional FCFS list. This is mainly due to the fact that a large number of reports are not being reviewed! A total of 558847 ZRO are paid to bounty hunter. With a Average Value of 2686 ZRO/Hunter, and a Median Value of 702 ZRO/Hunter. The most successful bounty hunter received a reward of 58794.56 ZRO, and the least successful hunter received 1.6 ZRO, unlucky? Well, but he is not the unluckiest. There are hundred of hunters who spent time to work on the hunt, produce perfectly clear report, yet our report haven't even been looked at yet at this date and sybils in our report are getting hundreds of thousands of ZRO which would've gotten many of us few thousand ZRO in reward each. As we can see from the statistic, the team took time to review and accepted 100+ reports from 1 single hunter. But most of us who followed the rule to consolidate our work and submitted only 1-2 reports, yet our report are not getting reviewed. Most importantly the reports are also not reviewed in FCFS order as promised. As @PrimordialAA promised 1 month earlier that he would offer a fair compensation for unreviewed report soon, but as of today we haven't heard anything planned for us from Bryan. Many of us have agreed that what Bryan initially proposed: offering us the average amount of bounty to valid yet unreviewed reports is probably the simplest solution to move forward. (Even though it is less then what a lot of us could have gotten) We would like to ask for these 2 things: 1. Fair reward for all unreviewed report 2. Release the status of all reports, whether it is approved, rejected or unreviewed, including the reason for rejection. We would like to see a fair and open report review process.
0xFrypan tweet media0xFrypan tweet media
English
6
3
14
3K
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@PrimordialAA @lucibgt @fromhill3 Please also announce the compensation of real users, finally recognized as not Sybil in the final list. Sorry! You were actually a real user. Were you just going to tell us "unlucky"?
English
0
0
0
36
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
@lucibgt @fromhill3 I think the version we have now is final but waiting for confirmation or anybody flagging any issues. Would like it to be up for 72 hours for review / flag any misattribution
English
9
0
0
594
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
Advice to founder/CEOs in the space. Literally ignore everything and everyone and focus on building an amazing product. On the back of an amazing product fundraising, BD, and everything else becomes 100x easier. I've never done a ton of conference circuit. Hadn't been at a conference for months prior to EthCC and won't be at one again for months more until the fall. Most of the people you see at every stop of the circuit should be an auto red flag and most likely means they care more about partying than building. When you are at conferences, use the time to catch up with people you care about and share same vision of the future as you. I value an evening with @SmokeyTheBera & @hotpot_dao at a factor of ~1000x over attending a generic event with 300 people I don't know or random party. Also, panel-mania is real. Most panels are pretty low value. Think the space is doing this incredibly wrong atm and it's optimized more for sponsorships (give them a panel spot!) and selling tickets than any sort of real value. Panels should either be much longer with focused topics or much less people. Debate heavy is better. I thought @EspressoSys/@benafisch did an amazing job with curation (although not nearly enough time to really dig into the weeds which that panel definitely could have done)
Lisa Akselrod@cryptobuilder_

I talked to some CEOs at ethcc and got the intuition that being a CEO is the most non-fun role at the crypto conf - You are invited to infinite number of panels. Some of them are not related to you at all but the FPL (Fundamental Panel Law) says: the more CEOs — the better - You can’t go for parties or see friends because after each event you are invited to the VIP speakers dinner - You can’t go for parties or see friends because you need to prepare slides for tomorrow keynotes because the FSEL (Fundamental Side Event Law) says: the more CEOs — the better - Outsourcing companies are ready to grasp you at every corner because development, marketing, PR, airdrop, and other outsourcings deadly need to be sold - You get infinity of DMs in all possible messengers (including ICQ that you haven’t used since 2010) calling for meeting without any clear agenda just to explore how we can help each other - You see how all other people (even your CTO) are having fun and wondering when is your turn to have fun but then the conference is over and you got 10x follow ups in all messengers calling for a follow up call *based on author’s talks with CEOs, not a time management, life, or conference advice.

English
46
54
534
238.5K
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@PrimordialAA So, the final completion of the Sybil list will be in 2050?
English
1
0
1
52
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@kylecavik1 @PrimordialAA He's right. Please release the final Sybil list as soon as possible. Of course, please also clarify the compensation for the real users who have been excluded from the final list.
English
0
0
1
24
kylecavik
kylecavik@kylecavik1·
@PrimordialAA Dear Bryan, do you have news about the situation of real users that were considered as sybils, but taken out of the list after the claiming process started? What’s the plan, will we be able to claim tokens, when? x.com/primordialaa/s…
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA

@_leander30 @SybilHorror6 they were removed from sybil list but not added back for eligibility merkle root had already been regenerated. We will figure something out for them

English
1
0
2
34
xmail.box
xmail.box@9560_crypto·
@LayerZero_Labs @PrimordialAA hey! Please release the final Sybil list as soon as possible. Of course, please also clarify the compensation for the real users who have been excluded from the final list.
English
0
0
0
89