AAM1232

@carloslovessm They have different goals and objectives, so you shouldn't really try to compare them by more generic categories like being unique or different. At the very least, comps should start off with what kind of story they want to tell and if they were successful/competent.

@carloslovessm You could very easily type up something along this line about USM 2024 or any other well received SM media/comic run, you know. It's not really illuminating in its praising of the show's qualities.

@carloslovessm Condemn is perhaps a bit too harsh, but you were surely complaining about the narratives around USM 2024 and YFNSM right? Did you write something else there?

@carloslovessm Ah the old copycat gassing technique.

@carloslovessm So your option is to descend to the level you condemned? Impressive logic.

@tripodisded @GovindIstSTH That reason is classism btw.

@GovindIstSTH we dont need football level banters , cricket is not football . It is called as gentleman’s game for a reason

"we need football level banters" > gets offended by this > Gets offended by 49 jokes > Gets offended by ipl pages making reels > Gets offended by a whistle > Gets offended by a 15 year old kid playing bhojpuri songs > Gets offended by a fan pretending to do black magic > Gets offended by a DJ > Gets offended by player claiming a ground as his "Home ground"

@sonuyadavbhu27 @meme_ki_diwani Most people also don't feel the need to be so hopelessly stupid for everyone to see. For you, it seems like an addiction sadly.

@meme_ki_diwani Is public masturbation inherently wrong? No one was coerced or forced to watch him. What makes public deep kissing different from public masturbation? Most of the time, people hate one and support the other.

Cmnts blaming her have the same thinking like the one who harassed her. Miserable upbringing.

@ComicsCuts @FordYorger62 Aww, you're cute. Maybe one day you'll be able to read more than Tweets.

@AAM12322 @FordYorger62 Go back to your homework.

What do you like about Amazing Spider-Man by Joe Kelly? I like how he writes Peter with a grounded and mature voice

@ComicsCuts @FordYorger62 Speaking from experience, presumably.

@FordYorger62 Sucks to suck.

@Ron_Christian55 They really let mosquitoes pay for anything nowadays. Inhumane behaviour tbh.

I find it absolutely ironic that in a show that is supposedly about SUPERHEROES, about people who are meant to rise above normal human weakness and stand as symbols of hope, one of its central characters, Atom Eve, goes and has an abortion. And from everything that’s implied, that was Mark’s child. His kid. And he didn't even get a say. He was apparently… absent. And her response to that situation is basically, “Well, this is hard, so I’m just going to end it.” Let that sink in for a second. This is a character who is framed as compassionate, empathetic, morally grounded. A HERO. The kind of character we’re supposed to admire, look up to, maybe even feel inspired by. And yet when faced with the responsibility of protecting the most innocent, defenseless life imaginable—her own unborn child—she doesn’t rise to the occasion. She doesn’t fight through it. She doesn’t struggle and overcome. She doesn’t even try to embody that heroic ideal. She folds. Immediately. Because it’s difficult. Because she might have to do it alone. Because it would change her life. That’s it. That’s the line where her “heroism” just completely folds. And I’m supposed to sit here and accept that? I’m supposed to still see her as a hero after that? I’m supposed to root for her like nothing happened? No. Absolutely not. Because at that point, what even is the definition of a hero anymore? If someone who has the power to save lives on a massive scale can casually decide that the most vulnerable life imaginable isn’t worth protecting, then what are we even doing here? What’s the message? That heroism only applies when it’s convenient? That saving lives is optional depending on your personal circumstances? And before anyone jumps in with the usual defenses because I already know they’re coming...save it. I don’t care about the “context.” I don’t care about the “emotional complexity.” I don’t care about the essays explaining why it was “a deeply human decision” or “a realistic portrayal of struggle.” I’ve heard it all before. It’s the same recycled talking points every time something like this comes up. People bending over backwards, twisting themselves into knots, doing Olympic-level mental gymnastics just to justify something that completely undermines the very foundation of what these characters are supposed to represent. And that’s really the bigger issue here, isn’t it? This isn’t just about one character. This is about what modern “superhero” storytelling has become. Shows like Invincible don’t just tell stories—they go out of their way to tear down the idea of heroism itself. They take pride in it. They revel in it. There’s this smug, almost arrogant tone of “Look how mature we are because we’re deconstructing everything you used to love.” And what does that “deconstruction” look like? Ultra-violence. Endless gore. Heads exploding like water balloons. Limbs getting ripped off. Blood sprayed across the screen like it’s trying to win an award for how shocking it can be. And then on top of that, moral decisions that completely gut the idea of heroes being something aspirational. It’s like the show is actively allergic to sincerity. Like it can’t stand the idea of heroes being genuinely good, genuinely selfless, genuinely inspiring. Everything has to be twisted, darkened, or dragged through the mud in the name of being “realistic.” Being cynical doesn’t make something deep. Being brutal doesn’t make something meaningful. And tearing down ideals doesn’t make you smarter than the people who still believe in them. It just makes the whole thing feel hollow. And I look around and I still see people watching this. Still praising it. Still calling it “peak superhero storytelling.” And I honestly don’t get it. I really don’t. Why? What are you getting out of this? Is it the shock value? The gore? The constant subversion for the sake of subversion? The characters making decisions that completely contradict the idea of what a hero is supposed to be? Because from where I’m sitting, it just looks like people have been conditioned to accept this kind of thing as “normal” for the genre now. Like this is just what superheroes are supposed to be broken, compromised, morally inconsistent, and wrapped in layers of blood and cynicism. And if that’s the case, then yeah… I’ll pass. Go ahead. Defend it. I know some of you will. Go ahead and stutter through your explanations. Pull out the think pieces. Do your triple-axel somersaults of mental gymnastics to explain why this is actually brilliant, why it’s “nuanced,” why it’s “important storytelling.” Convince yourself that this is what heroism looks like now. But don’t expect me to buy into it. Because to me, this isn’t bold storytelling. It’s not deep. It’s not inspiring. It’s just another example of a genre losing sight of what made it worth caring about in the first place and expecting the audience to applaud while it happens.

@lourdemma Not sure if you understand that the OP never had a point.

@mkurland23 @abysmaldogwater That's all anyone asks for though. Sadly the current bunch have no imagination and willpower to attempt it.

@AAM12322 @abysmaldogwater It’s not too much to ask. But it would have to be done the right way to make any difference.

Wait are you an MJ fan or do you just want Peter and MJ back together?

@patelsahil2002 @strike3xx I just don't see where the confidence in Ant's offensive game and Minnesota's offense in general comes from, really, especially in contrast to Denver's. And at the moment, Minnesota doesn't appear to have the same sort of defense they had in 2024 to replicate that series.

@AAM12322 @strike3xx we get to find out together!

My full thoughts on why I'm picking the Minnesota Timberwolves to beat the Denver Nuggets this R1 I reserve the right to recant if Ant's isn't fully healthy game 1 (posted both vertical and horizontal, pics are the same)

@patelsahil2002 @strike3xx I think he can't.

@strike3xx I think he can

@Dr__Denim @UncannySp1der Go bitch off then.

@UncannySp1der My brother in Christ, we were just talking about Tom King the entire time. People like you just piss me off and make me lose interest in reading comics if you just wanna argue and whine.

"Idgaf if Tom King is some misogynistic war criminal-" oh so you really are just nothing

@maZombies @Exalted_Speed I think the BND/Slott period being rewritten would probably not fly with the editorial given that adaptations do draw from it to various degrees. Not sure how much fans would care if suddenly Spider-Island, Slott's Spider-Verse or Superior would be irrelevant.

@Exalted_Speed Real question, do you think that if a writer just pulled a Dallas and started a run of ASM with everything since right before OMD was a bad dream they could get away with it?

if you want to be pedantic it's an IN STORY AND IN UNIVERSE retcon. That said it's still a fucking retcon of epic proportions and had to have more retcons later to justify stuff like no one remembering Peter. So yes it's a fucking retcon.

@SusieM414141 Shameless Nazis.

This woman’s husband is a huge NASCAR fan, obviously. Check out this collection. Cool or overkill? I like it myself. I’m sure it’s going to be worth some serious $$$ someday.

@BecomingCritter Only if you have the intelligence of a rock.

correct and based

@Toastyt123 @ThusBoat @DShyKnock Not their fault a grain of sand is more intelligent than you could ever be.

@ThusBoat @DShyKnock That literally doesn’t make sense try again.

Glad the worst didn’t happen Now get on that 25th amendment push or impeachment trial because nobody should ever be using the threat of wiping out a civilization as a threat Don’t normalize this shit