Ian

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Ha its so funny how you keep repeating the same loop of robotic pivots bc you have nothing original to say. You can keep posting all the PL memes, it doesn't and won't change the laws in our country and in our state constitutions. Cute meme tho

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Location does not determine rights, honey. Human rights are based on quiddity, not qualia.

PC: I get that you personally wouldn't get an abortion, but why wouldn't you want to keep the legal option available for yourself? PL: Okay, imagine for a second we were talking about your born children, and then tell me how that question sounds.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Inside their mother's womb yes they had less rights Its so funny how you keep trying to pivot to bullshit instead of responding to what I wrote. Outside the womb we all have the same rights. Black white toddler. Outside the womb. Jfc. But its my lack of intellect ha

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Your lack of intellect and your divorce from logic are quite concerning. So blacks were subhuman property while slavery was legal? And Jews were non-person human entities under the Thrid Reich?

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife I did answer lol. Youre responding to what I wrote. Pregnant women have special right yes. This is what I mean by not living in reality. We can terminate a fetus/child as long as its within the woman's body. You keep circling back as if my answer changed

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Why cant you answer? Why do you pretend women need special gender rights in order to be equal? Do you think were second-class citizens unless we can kill our kids? Do we lack the moral agency to make choices for our own body before we allow another body to originate inside us?

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife If you want to frame women's rights as supremacist over a fetus im fine with that. I agree with it

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Nope. Not being able to commit feticide does not violate a woman's rights. Stop dodging. Do you know what the core tenet of supremacism is?

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Im answering all of your goofy pivots. A woman's rights are being violated by not being able to legally remove something growing inside of her. Obviously

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Great. Laws are subjective and change. Why cant you answer the question? None of a womans rights are violated by the natural healthy functions of her organs or the outcomes of her actions. To claim they are is blatant misogyny.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Ya and again this ignores dozens of legal decisions and state constitutions. You want supremacism over a pregnant woman. I mean we can go back and forth over who's rights are being violated at the end of the day it doesnt hurt my argument

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Again, rights to one's own body never justify unprovoked intentional force against innocents. Do you know what the core tenet of supremacism is?

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Again. Avoiding reality. My argument is women's rights to their own body is more important than the rights of the fetus growing inside of her. I've already said as much. Everything else is me responding to your goofy pivots

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife This isnt a logical argument foe feticide, dear. Try again.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Those same slave states are the ones with anti abortion laws now check the maps. Do you think its interesting that the states with the worst education, opportunities and childhood outcomes are the ones with the strictest abortion laws?

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife The same states and judges tbat allowed slavery? Bandwagon fallacies arent convincing. Your support for a moral caste system does not justify a moral caste system. Pro-abortion feminists are the most prolific murderers in human history. This is undisputed.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Dozens of state constitutions and thousands of judges disagree with you... but very unique insight you have. Very compelling. Never heard it before ha. So you think abortion is murder then?? Huh. Never thought of that angle. Well that upends every state law, great point ha

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Darling, rights to ones own body never grants a right to use force against an innocent's body for your own benefit without consent. But thanks for exposing your supremacism.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Keep pivoting until you find an angle lol. I think women's rights to their body are more important than the fetus right to theirs (while body autonomy is at hand). You think the opposite. All.youre doing here is avoiding that reality with goofy misuse of.words

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife When one can not consent, we assume they do not consent, not that their consent is not needed. Women who abort are murderers and murderers belong in prison, dear.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Youre not even using words correctly. Of course the decision is autonomous. The fetus cant make the decision. This is what I mean by not living in reality. Its an autonomous choice and it deals with body autonomy rights good lord.

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Again, there is no way to frame abortion as an autonomous decision. Abortion is unprovoked homicide with malice aforethought.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Location = body autonomy issue vs no body autonomy issue. Lime is said the fact that you dont agree with it doesnt make the issue disappear. You want to have an easy convo on your own terms instead of reality

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife Irrelevant. The child has every right to exist where it originates. Location ≠ ownership. We already outlawed owning another human being when we freed your slaves.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife Is the fetus inside the woman's body? This is a yes or no question

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife There is no logical way to frame a womans unprovoked, premeditated, and intentional non-consensual lethal force against an innocent's body to allieviate her natural condition as an autonomous decision. Abortion is choice like rape is choice: the victim never gets to choose.

@luvmyjaide @secularprolife The entirety of the abortion argument is about body autonomy. That you dont care about women's rights while pregnant doesnt mean the issue doesnt exist

@ABrownLamp @secularprolife There is no bodily autonomy argument for abortion, so...

@IstandwithICE @Outspoken_Sam Hey retard which side had a black guy for president?

@Outspoken_Sam The left are hateful cultist lunatics & history confirms the left have ALWAYS been extremely politically violent. Liberals: "butt, butt dA parTieS sWiTchED!" "uR rACisT!"

Democrats were the party of the KKK. Democrats are still the party of the KKK.

@sAywHAAt5 @KentuckyJones01 @JClevemon @TristanSnell Lol pls tell me what you think these bill did instead. Use your big boy words not just "it wasnt anti gerrymandering." What did the Freedom to Vote Act do instead of prevent gerrymandering. This is where you disappear bc you cant read ha

@ABrownLamp @KentuckyJones01 @JClevemon @TristanSnell Because it wasn't actually an anti gerrymandering bill you retard. You can name it whatever you like, but that doesn't mean the contents of the bull actually prevent gerrymandering. It just changes how it's done

GOP - *gerrymanders* DEMS - hey stop that no fair GOP - *gerrymanders even more* DEMS - we mean it we’re gonna sue SCOTUS - *legalizes gerrymandering completely* DEMS - *start gerrymandering* GOP - HEY STOP THAT NO FAIR!!!! 😭

@greymouser1956 @tonyhamm17 @Playteaux1 You are allergic to answering questions but anyway that's not how the House works. Whoever owns the majority runs the entire lower chamber. Youre talking about federal influence on states rights which is a different issue. But thats funny supporting trump yet also states rights

@ABrownLamp @tonyhamm17 @Playteaux1 No I have more of a jeffersonian outlook for the states. Each state independent with limited federal government. And the insults are not really necessary.

I can’t believe democrats are happy that they disenfranchised half of state of any representation. That’s not democracy.

@greymouser1956 @tonyhamm17 @Playteaux1 Oh ok. So you think blue states should look at red states redistricting mid decade and just not return the favor? Why tf would they do that? You people cant think more than one step ahead? What'd you think was going to happen???

@ABrownLamp @tonyhamm17 @Playteaux1 I never said it was illegal dumbass. I just didn't understand why Texas's politics is justification for Virginia politics. Virginia has politically gone to shit since I lived there.. .

@fuddlictics @tonyhamm17 @Playteaux1 Oooh sorry. The supreme court said gerrymandering is allowed as long as its not based on race. Remember? Thats how TX got away with it. Remember how based you thought TX was. Now we all gwt to deal with the aftermath

@ABrownLamp @tonyhamm17 @Playteaux1 What part of the Virginia Constitution do I believe they violated? Article II Section 6-A.