April Droemer

@ArtifexMemor It's only up for you from here! Thank you for speaking out and standing up for Charlie!

1k on YouTube already, wow. Thank you. I am truly speechless. I did not expect my voice to mean this much... Sorry I waited so long to say something. Truth will always prevail. Christ is King.

@its_The_Dr My father in law just got bit by a diamondback rattlesnake and put him in the ICU for a few days. It's illegal to kill them unless it's in self defense or they pose a danger to animals/people! I'd say that's a pretty good reason to kill one!

If you get things that can hurt you or your family in your yard I can’t blame them for getting rid of it.

@LauraLoomer Maybe we should cancel and silence the people calling for the cancelling and silencing of other people.

Pretty sure I warned this would happen. In fact, I said this over a year ago! As I said before, people can either learn the easy way or the hard way when it comes to disavowing Tucker Carlson. I don’t make the rules. I just read the room and I politely said this over a year ago. I was the first to say it too in a Politico interview with @adamwren in case anyone wants to pull the receipts.

@BlakeSNeff A quick search could've told Blake just how badass this man is! I wonder if Blake has any of these accomplishments

@BlakeSNeff This not so bright naval special warfare sniper has served in over 400 combat missions & received over 50 honors including two silver stars & 4 bronze star medals with valor; also best selling author, podcaster, co founder of organization & most decorated US combat vet of his era

I don’t know enough about whoever that is to say if he’s a liar or a sociopath like you are, but that clip is probably enough to establish he’s not that bright.

@lisaknows429 Kinda makes sense BUT can someone explain why the lead investigator didn't know the FBI hired people to cover up the scene? Shouldn't they have been in better communication? Not saying it's sus but it's kind of odd he found out on the news the FBI covered it up

🔥New Series! Common Sense > Conspiracy Enjoy Part 1! Why didn't they hold UVU as a crime scene indefinitely? Why did they have to dig up the top soil where Charlie was killed? Is there a common sense answer or is it all a big conspiracy? Turns out there are very logical answers for it all. Follow for more! Featured Candy Cult Member: Boilermaker216

@kangminlee @LauraLoomer Israel is going to make us be blessed with over 40 trillion in debt! I don't remember in the Bible where God said give Israel every cent you have while we accumulate debt, barely live paycheck to paycheck, and have our govt harm us with pandemics

"Whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, whoever curses Israel will be cursed." - @LauraLoomer America has been blessing Israel for over 70 years now. We've gotten feminism, transgenderism, sodomy, abortion, mass immigration, pornography, child mutilation, pointless wars, and families being torn apart. How are we being blessed?

@MikkiWillis I feel the same!Why are people ridiculing others for asking questions?Of course you're gonna have some extremists pushing some crazy conspiracy theories but read it & move on!I'm gonna believe the expert hunter/military, lawyer, doctors, etc saying this doesn't add up; here's why

Case closed! Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. The evidence is overwhelming. Move along! Why do so many social media influencers want this case closed? They claim the evidence presented during the preliminary hearing was “crystal clear,” “damning,” and “conclusive.” They are either seeing what they want to see, or they are lying. I’ve been thoroughly investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination since the day it happened. This is the first time I’ve said anything publicly about the case. I couldn’t care less about being the first to break a story or about the clicks and cash that come with it. I care about accuracy. My track record speaks for itself. What’s happening on social media right now is identical to what happened during COVID. Anyone who dared to seek information about the safety and efficacy of an experimental mRNA injection was labeled a science denier and shamed into solitude. Ask questions about the public assassination of Charlie Kirk and you’re “crazy,” “a grifter,” or “a Candace cult member.” To conclude that Tyler Robinson acted alone requires setting aside a number of glaring details that, at a minimum, warrant further scrutiny. These are just a few: THE OTHER GUNMAN An eyewitness videotaped an individual on the roof of the Losee Center, dressed in all-black tactical gear, including a face mask and helmet. This witness reported seeing what appeared to be a smaller/shorter rifle than the one later associated with the case. He stated that he observed the individual run across the roof, set up, and take the shot at 12:23 p.m. The weapon he saw appeared to be a smaller rifle than what authorities later highlighted. He noted the sound as a “sharp crack,” not a big hunting rifle boom. The witness reported these details to authorities, but to date no one has followed up. DISPATCH AUDIO 911 audio was broadcast shortly after the shooting. Dispatch relayed the suspect description to officers: “He’s on top of the building on the far north side, just east of the library… He’s going to be wearing all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, a black mask, possibly wearing a tactical vest and jeans.” DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE The lawn where Charlie Kirk was shot was paved over just four days later. The crime scene was excavated and covered with concrete on a Sunday. Dan Merrell was hired to pave the area. When he arrived at the scene, approximately 10 inches of topsoil had already been removed. Merrell stated on camera that someone coordinating the work told him, “The governor and the FBI said they want this done by Monday.” DNA DISCREPANCIES Forensic testimony indicated that DNA recovered from the towel wrapped around the rifle belonged to two individuals. One profile was identified as Robinson’s roommate, Lance Twiggs, while Robinson was identified only as a possible contributor to DNA found on the towel and on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop. ATF forensic biologist Kaitlyn Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA sample was “the most degraded.” What this could mean is that Lance Twiggs was the last to touch the rifle. INCONCLUSIVE FRAGMENTS During the preliminary hearing, ATF examiner Samantha Karner testified about a bullet jacket fragment pulled from Kirk’s autopsy compared against test-fires from the Mauser bolt-action rifle. Her analysis concluded the fragment “could not be identified or excluded” as having been fired from the rifle, with the report stating “the result of the comparison was inconclusive.” She testified she was “unable to say one way or another” due to a lack of microscopic marks on the bullet jacket fragment. THE UNFIRED BULLET During cross-examination, the defense asked investigator David Hull about a bullet found on a rooftop other than the rooftop where Robinson is alleged to have fired the fatal shot. Hull said he “believed” there was an unfired bullet found on another building, not the Losee Center. He said the area wasn’t treated as part of the crime scene because the bullet “was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle.” When pressed on specifics, Hull said he could not identify the building, could not recall the type of round, didn’t know when it was found, and didn’t know where it currently was. ENHANCED SURVEILLANCE VIDEO Judge Graf agreed to play an “enhanced” UVU surveillance video showing the person alleged to be Robinson on the rooftop—but ruled it would be shown only to people physically present in the courtroom. As if following a script, conservative influencers who were in the courtroom that day echoed the same talking points. They claimed that the footage was clear, high-definition proof showing Robinson taking the shot—framing it as “undeniable.” However, others who were in the courtroom strongly refute these claims. Brandi Siciliani posted on X “I was in the courtroom today. There is no high-quality, zoomed-in footage showing anyone taking a shot. The video shown is the same distance as the footage of ‘Tyler’ jumping off the roof… I have no idea why people are claiming otherwise. They know the video isn’t going to be released publicly, so they’re misrepresenting what was actually shown in court.” As a filmmaker, I know a thing or two about video technology. 4K resolution alone doesn’t overcome the physics of distance and digital zoom. 4K refers to the sensor/output resolution (roughly 3840×2160 pixels), not how much detail exists on a subject 100+ yards away. If the subject occupies a tiny fraction of the frame, you only have a small number of actual pixels covering that person. Zooming in digitally (enlarging in post-production) doesn’t add resolution—it just makes the existing pixels bigger. It can improve visibility of shapes and colors, but it doesn’t recover facial detail or other identifying features that weren’t resolved at capture. Not even AI can be trusted to upscale pixelated video. Enhancing a blurry face with AI can produce a coherent, convincing face that doesn’t match the actual person—because the model is filling gaps with statistically likely features, not real ones. And… exhale. These are just a few of the outstanding details that, in my opinion, should warrant deeper investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk. What you’re witnessing is a psychological operation cunningly deployed to further divide us and stop us from asking questions. Beware of anyone pushing to close this case prematurely. We must never allow politics to thwart the pursuit of truth and justice. This case holds the power to kill critical thinking or pull back the curtain to reveal the inner workings of “fifth generation warfare.” Which way it goes is entirely up to us, the people. “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” Mikki Willis Investigative Filmmaker

@AshleyShyMiller You'd be surprised at how many gay men have told me they've slept with married men!

This woman’s husband died and she found out he was cheating on her, for years, with other married men and she’s been reading his messages from the hookup sites. OMG!

@BlakeSNeff You named off a lot of attacks she made for someone that only watched a clip someone sent you. Anyways you forgot one....she called you a bald creature! I can send the clip if need be

This clip I was just sent from today's episode really is a perfect demonstration in microcosm of Candace's behavior these past few months. In this clip: -Candace bullies and belittles one of Charlie's young 20-something assistants who was present at Charlie's murder. She never offers any evidence he did anything wrong, she just feels like attacking him. -Candace suggests there is something suspicious or weird about the fact an assistant can't recall the other shirts that were available besides the Freedom shirt Charlie actually wore. -Candace subtly takes a dig at Charlie, mocking the number of assistants he had and reacting to (truthful) stories about him by asking "When did Charlie become such a diva?" As usual, there's a hefty dose of projection; Candace asks because she herself is infamously an incredibly demanding and unpleasant person to work with. There's another revealing thing: Candace puts forward her version of Charlie and talks about the creation of Blexit or the "#HimToo" hashtag -- both things that date back to 2018. She has to dig all the way back to 2018, of course, because she and Charlie were not close friends after that point.

@BlakeSNeff So we can find where Charlie shared his opinion on time change but no one knows how he would feel about bombing Iran

Andrew and I discuss the push for permanent DST, the superiority of Standard Time (aka God's Time), and Charlie's own view on this critically important topic.

@patriot_savvy How are y'all ok with being trillions in debt and still be in support of sending money to fund wars for other countries? I don't get it! I still have hope for Trump but it's dwindling fast

Enough is Enough!! Either you’re in or you’re out. We have elections to win and a country to save. 💋✌🏻🇺🇸

@ScottJenningsKY I always wondered why Scott would subject himself to sitting with Democrats on CNN all day but now I know he's just like them. The only Republicans in support of this are the ones that say they could watch Trump murder someone on the WH steps & still vote for him.

Massie siding with Democrats but ultimately failing to pass a law just about sums up his career.

@neededsafespace @realstewpeters So what maybe he slapped some people around while he was drunk then charges got dropped! Show me a story where he's tied to child trafficking then I'll be mad until then who cares

@realstewpeters Oh right here is your most recent one

You think posting a 20-year-old mugshot of me is some kind of flex? We know what you did. We know how you betrayed Charlie. You’re cooked, bro. Can’t wait to see your mugshot. Unlike me, you’ll actually be going away for a long time to a real prison. Tyrone is waiting for you.

@takenaps Perfectly said! I don't know the truth neither does Candace or the people talking for TPUSA. Do they all have agendas they're pushing? Maybe but what I do know is people that specialize in guns, lawyers, doctors coming out and saying it don't add up is who I'm listening to

Sometimes I think about the moment the world finds out that Charlie Kirk's murder wasn't what they said it was. I have no idea what's true, but my suspicion grows and grows every day. Maybe it will be exactly what they said it is. To me, the biggest indicator that something stinks is how there is always a new lie, discrepancy, exaggeration or bending of what should be cut and dry. Could you imagine what that moment would be like? The nuclear warhead mind explosion that it would set off? What if @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @IanCarrollShow and all the people speculating were actually right? What if this level of coordination and deception really went down right in front of our eyes? Think about who it would implicate and what it would mean. Think about all the things they've said about these people. Wouldn't that be something? There have been many times I've leaned more one way vs the other, but since the preliminary hearing I am way more convinced something stinks than I was before. I know people get hurt by this because of one reason or the other, but it is our duty as Americans to pursue truth wherever it leads us, if not only to gain true justice for Charlie and his actual killer, but to potentially save what would then be an innocent man. Maybe Tyler Robinson is a lone gunman, but the investigation will only lead us to that conclusion if it is true. I don't understand how people think that doing nothing and just waiting for the story is somehow more noble? Sorry for trying to understand a confusing narrative? There is no harm in pursuing truth, do not let these people shame you for it.

@laralogan This is why AI is so dangerous we can't even tell if he's faking it! Not even the AI can be trusted in telling us if it's real or not. If they are lying we the people need to be able to sue.

To all digital soldiers…what happens when you try to pull the metadata from this photo? And who can trace that front page…

@keithedwards I can't keep up with all these damn conspiracy theories! One at a time

I want to know how the woman who called 911 for Lindsey Graham knew Lindsey was having a cardiac event. She was 40 miles away in Baltimore. Was someone in the house with Lindsey? How did she know? Who is she?

@keithedwards 😂

welcome back lindsey graham

@CrystalSmallen AND there was a bald guy driving around with other people in the car caught on that lady's webcam! Hmmm

Let me get this straight.Tyler went to UVU and talked with someone from TPUSA. Blake Neff can't be accounted for in his own words that morning. Blake Neff is a weirdo online discord.Tyler's in the same type of discords as Blake. I don't want to speculate It seems kind of weird.

@bennyjohnson You right Benny I've seen that evidence but what about the other evidence that doesn't add up? You wanna convince us then can someone answer the questions we have on why certain evidence/events aren't adding up

Sorry, I’m done. I just called out all the retards live on Fox News. After this week, here’s the question: What more evidence exactly do you need to be convinced Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk? Be specific. Charlie Kirk’s prosecution team was specific: -Autopsy: Single gunshot wound to the neck with .30-06 bullet fragments. -Admissions: Robinson confessed FOUR times — in text messages, letters, and witness testimony. -Forensics: His DNA was found on the murder weapon and the towel used to conceal it. -Campus Footage: Caught on UVU security cameras 4 times on the 10th and 11th. -Roommate Testimony: Lance Twiggs testified that Robinson was etching the engraved bullets later found with the weapon, identified Robinson in security footage and said Robinson confessed. -Robinson caught on surveillance camera on the roof of UVU pulling the trigger. So if it wasn’t Tyler Robinson — please tell me, who was it? Where is your evidence. Oh you have none? Then STFU.