@Angle__wix He only had one magic spear he had to use it sparingly it takes a long time to make another one
English
money
828 posts
The Night King sniped a flying dragon out of the sky with an ice spear, but Jon snow and others were standing ten feet away on a rock, he just stared at them for three days.
Jae@Real_jaeflex
What doesn't make sense in Game of Thrones?
English
@Real_jaeflex She warned Jon that he doesn't know Ramsay and Ramsay is outsmarting him she needed to trick Ramsay and if Jon knew Ramsay might have smelled it
English
Sansa keeping the Knights of the Vale a secret from Jon during the Battle of the Bastards just to have a cinematic entrance.
Jae@Real_jaeflex
What doesn't make sense in Game of Thrones?
English
@_KaizenMindset_ Interesting u skipped 20 to 30 - literally the best time to start a family
Why are you working for a company you need to please by not having a baby? Are you married?
And what even does "it's too late" at 30 mean?
Also, 35 is not really high risk yet, more like 38, maybe 37
English
Mujer:
Quedé embarazada en secundaria.
“La arruinó su vida.”
Quedé embarazada en la universidad.
“Irresponsable.”
Quedé embarazada a los 20.
“Un problema para la empresa.”
Quedé embarazada a los 30.
“Ya es tarde.”
Quedé embarazada a los 35.
“Embarazo de riesgo.”
La sociedad:
“¿Por qué ya no nacen niños?”
Español
Moments when the 11-year-old player defeated chess master Dina Belenkaya: "You will be glad you played with me in the future."
English
@LebraoDosHawks Joffrey angered us more because of his position of power he became king and used it to abuse whoever he wanted Ramsay was sadistic but he wasn't really in a position of power
English
Po, o Ramsay nao deve em nada pro Joffrey.
Inclusive, acho que o Ramsay (por ser mais velho) tinha algo que o Joffrey nao tinha e nunca iria ter: Inteligência.
Ramsay era sádico, ele brincava com a vítima deixando ate eles escaparem, so pra ter o prazer de torturar.
Ele fez a gente ter pena do Theon Greyjoy de tanto que ele torturou o cara po.
Nerd em Cartaz@nerdemcartaz
Não existe um personagem na cultura pop que tenha sido mais odiado que Joffrey "Baratheon" de Game Of Thrones.
Português
money retweetledi
A neat little trick here from Talarico and Colbert
Federal law since 1932 has required broadcast media to give equal time to competing political candidates, but Colbert wanted to platform only Talarico and not his other opponents.
So, he interviews Talarico but releases the video only online. Everyone who sees it thinks it aired on the show, Colbert doesn't have to give equal time, and since he has virtually no TV viewers anyway, he still reaches his maximum audience.
Meanwhile, Talarico falsely claims that he's being censored and gets free publicity two weeks out from his primary election by claiming that almost a century of federal law is somehow President Trump's fault.
An ingenious way of getting around the law indeed...
James Talarico@jamestalarico
This is the interview Donald Trump didn’t want you to see. His FCC refused to air my interview with Stephen Colbert. Trump is worried we’re about to flip Texas.
English
money retweetledi
@SamaHoole Weren't we drinking goats milk all the years? That's a lot closer to human milk. They're formulated to grow it's users to closer to human sizes
English
Activist: "Drinking milk is for baby cows, not humans."
Farmer: "Humans have been drinking milk for 10,000 years."
Activist: "We're the only species that drinks another species' milk."
Farmer: "We're also the only species that cooks food, wears clothes, and builds houses."
Activist: "It's unnatural."
Farmer: "So are antibiotics. Should we stop using those?"
Activist: "That's different."
Farmer: "How? Both are things humans do that animals don't."
Activist: "Milk is meant for calves."
Farmer: "And wheat is meant to reproduce the wheat plant. Yet here we are eating bread."
Activist: "Most humans are lactose intolerant."
Farmer: "Most humans of European descent aren't. Evolution happened. We adapted."
Activist: "It's still weird."
Farmer: "Weirder than flying in metal tubes or talking to strangers on screens?"
English
This is spot on but I'll go one step further. Once you engage with law enforcement, the chances of misunderstanding, mistakes, and tragedy increase dramatically. No laws or Constitution will insulate you from LEO's perception of danger and their human reaction.
Armstrong Williams 🇺🇸@Arightside
The debate in Minnesota is being misframed. This is not about whether someone had the right to carry a firearm to a protest. The First Amendment protects protest. The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. You can legally carry a firearm loaded, with magazines at a protest. That right does not vanish because the setting is tense or political. In Minnesota, not having your permit physically on you is a petty misdemeanor, not jail-worthy, and the citation must be dismissed if a valid permit existed. Paperwork is not the issue. And carrying a loaded firearm is not a threat by itself. Millions of Americans lawfully carry every day without incident. Rights do not become violence simply because they make people uncomfortable. The real question is judgment. Why carry a firearm into close proximity with federal agents during a volatile encounter? That’s not a constitutional issue it’s a prudence issue. Lawful does not always mean wise, especially in chaotic moments where split-second decisions have permanent consequences. That’s why facts and a full investigation matter. We can defend constitutional rights and acknowledge reality at the same time. Anything less isn’t justice it’s noise.
English
The claim that Pretti's Sig discharged and that caused the agents to fire is so ridiculous because if you watch both angles you can clearly see the shooter already pulled his gun before disarmer that took Pretti's gun even stood up to walk away - shooter nudges disarmer to move
English
money retweetledi
He shot her out of anger, not fear for his life
English
money retweetledi
A particularly damning point from a longtime FBI Agent. Ross has phone in his right hand, switches to left to free up the right hand as he walks to the front of the car. He unholsters his weapon just as she shifts from reverse to drive. He is anticipating shooting, not reacting.
English
money retweetledi
@MiguelL43331025 @ApolloEvid3029 @ASFleischman Fake sped up video to make it look like he could've been killed
English
I watch a lot of police interactions with the public, and most experienced officers are so good at getting compliance just by being friendly and relaxed.
English
@ShawnMcGaffey88 @adamscochran Did you ever drive a car? She was reversing and she literally turns the wheel away the second she starts driving - which is exactly where you cut off the video because you're dishonest
But you can still notice it pretty clearly if you look carefully
English
@adamscochran Explain this video showing that her tires were still facing forward, while she pressed the gas, spinning the tires, just BEFORE he drew his weapon?
Mississauga, Ontario 🇨🇦 English
If you don’t speed up the video, then you’ll see (just like in all the other clips), that the officer was out of the way.
He leans over the hood and fires the first shot.
Then the woman accelerates.
Which, if you’ve just been shot at, is reasonable.
But MAGA only want to look at this clip and play it at 2x speed.
Dries Van Langenhove@DVanLangenhove
This angle clearly shows the ICE agent being hit and dragged on by the car. Could have easily killed him.
English
money retweetledi
money retweetledi
@AmySwearer Biggest proof this was murder is the fact he pulled his gun rather than running for his life
If he was afraid she trying to kill him, he wouldn't have time to pull his gun, he would jump out of the way first
English
I've now watched the Minneapolis ICE shooting from three different angles, and there's no real question -- it was quite obviously a legally justified use of deadly force by a law enforcement officer. That officer faced an unknown subject who, while ignoring lawful commands, pointed a 3000+ lbs. car at him and evidenced an intent to continue driving that car. He shot the driver (1) after the driver made physical contact with his body and (2) through the front windshield. You can slow down the video all you want and spend minutes analyzing micro-seconds to make after-the-fact assessments of the likelihood the driver actually intended to use the car as a lethal weapon. In reality, during those micro-seconds in real time, it's reasonable to presume that a driver ignoring your commands to stop is about to floor the gas peddle, turn the wheel into you, and run you over. It's no different than the reasonable presumption that the suspect who ignores your commands to keep their hands up and reaches for the gun in their waistband intends to use it against you rather than toss it away.
English