TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy)

16.4K posts

TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy) banner
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy)

TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy)

@ALegalProcess

Refugee of the People’s Republic of Seattle | Now in Scottsdale AZ | Corporate lawyer, but not: legal advice | your lawyer | or attorney advertising.

Katılım Ağustos 2021
3.5K Takip Edilen4.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy)
📢"The mental-health industry peddles universal screening—brief questionnaires given to all students—as “preventive,” “evidence-based,” or necessary to improve academic outcomes. That’s all false. High-quality research over several decades has failed to find mental-health or academic benefits from universal screening programs."
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy) tweet media
English
11
17
32
2.2K
Pamela Hobart
Pamela Hobart@gtmom·
Pour one out for ChatGPT's "Study Mode" 🪦 it was supposed to make ChatGPT teach instead of cheat... now buried so deep you can only summon it with a secret "/" command You don't have to be an AI hater to notice that an opt-in "make this actually hard" button is not going to become any smashing success
Pamela Hobart tweet media
English
3
0
15
339
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy)
@JasonBedrick @SchoolChoiceNow Alternative headlines: * Formerly ESA-friendly org turns its back on AZ school choice * School Choice Org Turns Saboteur in Arizona * School Choice Org Joins Teachers Unions in Subversive Plot?! * School Choice Now Becomes No Choice Ever! * Hey School Choice Now, Whadda Doing?!
English
0
0
4
76
Jason Bedrick
Jason Bedrick@JasonBedrick·
Why is @SchoolChoiceNow working with the anti-school choice group Save Our Schools Arizona to gather signatures for their dual ballot petitions to regulate the ESA? And why are their signature gatherers misleading voters about what they are signing? Video evidence below! 1/
Jason Bedrick tweet media
English
10
32
91
61.8K
State Armor
State Armor@StateArmor·
.@JTLonsdale warns CCP is funding AI doomerism: "They're putting hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars, into NGOs, which are tied to these groups... It's China's best strategy against America is to get us to be not confident enough to keep building."
English
2
8
20
2K
Math Curmudgeon
Math Curmudgeon@MathCurmudgeon·
@Hardymatt0 @ALegalProcess In order to determine whether something is a factor, you need to control as many variables as you can and hope for a dramatic change. Otherwise, you're guessing. Education research subjects are children and controlling all variables but one is a right bitch.
English
1
0
1
6
Stephen Bird
Stephen Bird@stephenvbird·
@ALegalProcess If you hire teachers who have a 3rd grade understanding of math and do not understand English grammar students are not going to learn. Instead, they sit and play with electronic devices. If they were learning they would not have time for phones or computers.
English
1
0
1
7
Matt Hart
Matt Hart@Hardymatt0·
@ALegalProcess Sure, but if phones were a factor you'd expect that removing them would increase attainment, however marginal. I don't think anyone was expecting or claiming that removing phones be the silver bullet that gives everyone top attainment.
English
2
0
1
26
zzzwakeup
zzzwakeup@ThomBriggs·
@ALegalProcess An entirely new digital pedagogy was attempted for decades, and schools are just now (sometimes partially) rolling back the biggest offender No reason to think scores would shoot up, but discipline and school environment are already showing improvements, so that's something
English
1
0
1
46
Pamela Hobart
Pamela Hobart@gtmom·
So many people want to start these "research shows..." discussions but then ***not actually specify / explain / evaluate *** the evidence!! P.S. shifting the burden of proof, throwing an entire textbook at someone, or flashing a credential do NOT count
Anna Stokke@rastokke

My personal experience sent me down a rabbit hole that I'm still in today, reading education research critically and asking hard questions. I wrote about what I've learned in a guest post for the Center for Educational Progress. 🎧Prefer to listen? It's in today's podcast episode. I hope it helps people. 🔗Links below

English
2
1
22
960
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy)
Very few things monocausal. For example, much of the SEL theory in education rests of the false premises of a 2011 study claiming it raises academic outcomes 11 percentage points. Demonstrably untrue.
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy) tweet media
Defiant L’s@DefiantLs

“As soon as devices were introduced into classrooms around 2010 scores have been falling in reading, in math, basically around the world.” “We have over a decade of research showing this experiment was a fail... Having students on devices harms their learning.”

English
2
7
20
947
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy)
🎯 Great framing. Homeschooled children should get the same opportunity to fail (and still graduate) as public school children. ➕I’ll add: homeschooling parents should get same liability immunity as public schools do.
Palmer Luckey@PalmerLuckey

@chrisman Ask them what the consequences should be for homeschooling parents who fail to educate children. Then ask what the consequences should be for public schools that do the same. The difference in answers is the game.

English
0
1
28
1K
missy purcell
missy purcell@MissyPurcell·
Michigan and California reviewed i-Ready and said it clearly: It does not meet the bar for a universal screener. Georgia found the same, but then our superintendent added it back because it’s widely used. That’s a big issue bc it: • Misses borderline students • Weak phonemic awareness measurement • Adaptive = can skip key skills Diagnostic ≠ screener. Popular ≠ effective. Read the full article: open.substack.com/pub/decodingmo…
missy purcell tweet media
English
16
31
95
7.1K
TheLegalProcess (v3.0 | Instruction Not Therapy) retweetledi
Palmer Luckey
Palmer Luckey@PalmerLuckey·
One of the reasons homeschooled kids have superior educational outcomes is avoiding the slow-progress-across-all-subjects method public schools impose on every student, no matter how they learn. The evaluation/testing you are talking about would almost certainly prohibit that sort of tailored education, especially since they would be designed and administered by a system that wants to eliminate homeschooling in almost all cases.
English
194
561
12.8K
206.3K
Gryphius
Gryphius@GryphiusEitel·
@ALegalProcess Absolutely. And many other weasel words. Simultaneous the high achievers we’re going to lift up all the low achievers, and the special ed interventions we’re going to boost the high achievers even higher. And everybody would live happily ever after.
English
1
0
1
11
Gryphius
Gryphius@GryphiusEitel·
We had a guest speaker at a district meeting telling us that every kid deserved an IEP. In that district, gifted and general ed kids were put into a hybrid program, to which they had to add mild-mod and mod-severe students with paraeducators. And the teacher is supposed to address all the individual needs within 50 minutes.
English
1
0
1
30