ARMREG

Looking forward to reading some @ARMREG_Official titles

@RedbeardEdward @KarlRadl Yes. Feel free to use our handy search function 😁 holocaustencyclopedia.com/object/lampsha…

@KarlRadl @ARMREG_Official is this information in the Holocaust Encyclopedia?

There's actually two alleged human lampshades from Buchenwald. The one you are talking about is the one that we know was actually in Buchenwald and is goat's skin. The other one is human skin but first appears in the late 1940s/early 1950s in the DDR with no providence.

This 24-page brochure is designed to be a mind-opener: it explains first the frightening grip censorship has on Western nations. It shows how historians are afraid, and how they have admitted lying in order to stay out of trouble. It next shows how mainstream Holocaust historians have a long track record of getting things wrong, and even admitting that they lied on purpose because “they had to.” It then explains how the historical record was manipulated right after the war by Stalinist investigators in postwar Poland. Buy a bundle and share it with your friends! Available from ARMREG: armreg.us/product/histor…

Discuss WW2 freely on the CODOH forum. codohforum.com

NEW TITLE FROM ARMREG! This book is designed to be a mind-opener for all those who are unaware of, indifferent or even close-minded to the idea that something may be fishy about the orthodox Holocaust narrative. It starts out with a brief overview of mainstream media complaining about fake AI-created Holocaust stories and about fake Holocaust witnesses. The need to be skeptical toward such “sources” leads us straight into the minefield of Holocaust source criticism and skepticism, and what happens to scholars active in that field. The rest of the first chapter explains many terrifying examples of Kafkaesque persecutions of dissidents. Part 2 of this study explores how government and social coercion has cowed historians. A string of explicitly or implicitly admitted lies utterly ruins the trustworthiness of mainstream historians active in this field of study. Part 3 charts the history of growing censorship, persecution and coercion in the West. It identifies which political and religious groups are the main culprits in the Death of the West. Part 4 shows a way forward for those willing to learn more. This title is available from ARMREG: armreg.us/product/histor…

Revisionist Holocaust Encyclopedia entry of the day: Auschwitz Album Read the full entry here: holocaustencyclopedia.com/document/ausch…

In 1993 Jewish theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a “Holocaust denier.” Irving sued her for libel in return. Subsequently a court case unfolded in England which attracted the attention of the world’s mass media in 2000. The sharpest weapon in Lipstadt’s defense arsenal was Jewish art historian Robert van Pelt, who presented an expert report claiming to refute revisionist assertions about Auschwitz. Because Irving had neither the support by any expert witnesses nor was he himself an expert on the Holocaust, he inevitable lost the case. Robert van Pelt was therefore praised as the defeater of revisionism. When he published his revised expert report in his book The Case for Auschwitz in 2002, he even advanced to the foremost expert on Auschwitz in the public’s eyes. Mattogno’s The Real Case for Auschwitz is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt. On 590 pages of text, Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes van Pelt’s assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts. The author’s first revelation is that van Pelt has committed plagiarism: he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in 1989 and 1993 by French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac – yet without naming his source even once. Mattogno’s analysis is devastating for both Pressac and van Pelt, as it reveals that their studies of Auschwitz ignore crucial counter-arguments, fail to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means, are highly inconsistent, use deceptive methods, present conflicting sources without due source criticism, deform all sources to serve the author’s perspective, and reveal a shockingly threadbare knowledge of the history of the Auschwitz camps. Mattogno therefore concludes: “The Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources.” This title is available from ARMREG: armreg.us/product/the-re…

Revisionist Holocaust Encyclopedia entry of the day: London Cage See the entry here: holocaustencyclopedia.com/location/other…

Did you know that the mass media were reporting an impending holocaust of six million Jews since the late eighteen-hundreds? Did you know that the media have repeatedly exposed the stories of Holocaust survivors to be lies? Did you know that many mainstream scholars have expressed doubts about the accuracy of Holocaust history books? Did you know that historians critically investigating the Holocaust narrative are thrown into jail in most European countries, and are not allowed to defend themselves in court? The present book addresses these and many more such issues. In the first section, it starts by defining what “the Holocaust” is and why it is an important topic. It then gives examples demonstrating that it is well to keep an open, critical mind. The second section tells the tale of many a mainstream scholar expressing doubts and subsequently falling from grace due to this “heresy.” The third section discusses in detail the physical traces and documents about the various claimed crime scenes, such as the camps at Auschwitz, Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor. It investigates the claimed murder weapons: gas chambers, gas vans, crematoria and cremation pits. The fourth section thoroughly examines to what degree we can rely on witness testimony, and it analyzes the pertinent aspects of the most prominent among them. In the last section, the author lobbies for free inquiry and a free exchange of ideas about this topic, exactly because the powers that be can’t face critical questions. Of all the thousands of books on this topic, this one gives the most-comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the critical research into the Holocaust. With its dialog style, it is pleasant to read, and with its logical organization and index, it can even be used as an encyclopedic compendium. This title is available from ARMREG: armreg.co.uk/product/lectur…

Revisionist Holocaust Encyclopedia entry of the day: Becher, Kurt Read the full entry here: holocaustencyclopedia.com/witness/perpet…

@lumberwendigo :/

@ARMREG_Official こんばんは。 外国人の方が機械翻訳でも読めるよう、紙媒体の文書のうち重要な箇所を書き写しました。 horacaust.ho-zuki.com/chiune-sugihar…

書籍：「命のヴィザ」言説の虚構-リトアニアのユダヤ難民に何があったのか？ を注文しました。 一昨日発売されたばかりの本なのに、紀伊国屋でもhontoでも既に売り切れらしく、楽しみです。

On January 25, 1929, 75 years before this book was first published, a man was born who probably deserves the title of the most courageous intellectual of the last third of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century: Robert Faurisson. With hitherto unheard of bravery and steadfastness, he challenged the dark forces of historical and political fraud, deception, and deceit with his unrelenting exposure of their lies and hoaxes. His method of analytical exactitude in historiography and his striving for clear brevity in presenting the results of his research have become both famous and infamous at once. Over the last 30 years, Robert Faurisson has become a role model of character strength to many, a lodestar for his method to his disciples, an idol for his breathtaking research activities to his admirers. This Festschrift is dedicated to him by some of his closest friends in his struggle for exactitude in historiography and his ongoing fight not only for historical and political, but also for individual justice. It describes and celebrates the man and his work. This title is available from ARMREG: armreg.us/product/exacti…

CODOH video of the day: HoloCast, Episode 5: Ethics Watch it here: codoh.com/library/docume…

@bc_revision 😎

@ARMREG_Official I have this book 👍🏻

Nowadays the Second World War is frequently called the Mother of All Wars, the ultimate war of Good versus Evil. The roles are invariably allocated: Hitler and his Nazi henchmen as the absolute evil, and the Allies as the liberators, the saviours of mankind. Never mind that Stalin fought the war together with the West, even though in 1939, when the war broke out, Stalin had already killed millions, whereas Hitler’s victims counted “only” a few hundreds at most. During the past decades, Hitler’s spectre has been raised repeatedly by politicians trying to demonise some country or some political leader in order to mobilize the masses for war, be it against Slobodan Miloševic Hitler, Saddam Hussein Hitler, or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Hitler. In Palestine, Hitler and his “Holocaust” has served in one way or another as a justification for every aggression perpetrated by the State of Israel. And so the world stumbles from one war to another, and Hitler still gets the blame. It is about time to end this perpetual war propaganda for the perpetual instigation of more wars. And that is exactly what Walendy does in the present book: proving that the clichés about the Mother of All Wars are profoundly wrong; that the Second World War was not a Good War at all; that simple Black and White, Good and Evil patterns do not fit here. For seven decades, mainstream historians have insisted that Germany was the main, if not the sole culprit for unleashing World War II in Europe. In the present book this myth is refuted. There is available to the public today a great number of documents on the foreign policies of the Great Powers before September 1939 as well as a wealth of literature in the form of memoirs of the persons directly involved in the decisions that led to the outbreak of World War II. Together, they made possible Walendy’s present mosaic-like reconstruction of the events before the outbreak of the war in 1939. This book has been published only after an intensive study of sources, taking the greatest care to minimize speculation and inference. Shortly after its 1964 initial publication, the German authorities put this work on their index of banned books, claiming that it was too dangerous because historians could only contradict it, but not refute it. After a legal battle lasting decades, the book was released in 1995 by the German Supreme Court. Future historical research will amplify the facts compiled in this book, but the defenders of “petrified propaganda” can no longer claim they are non-existent or irrelevant. This title is available from ARMREG: armreg.co.uk/product/who-st…

@666isMONEY Here's the encyclopedia entry. It has a book for further reading at the bottom. holocaustencyclopedia.com/concept/genera…

I’ve been doing research on #GeneralPlanOst, here’s what Google Gemini AI says about it (looks like fake atrocity propaganda), can you recommend a good book on it? Yes, Generalplan Ost was explicitly raised and used as evidence during the Nuremberg Trials, though its role varied significantly between the initial trials and the subsequent military tribunals. [1, 2, 3] The primary reason it did not take absolute center stage in the main trial is that the physical, master document of the plan was never found—the Nazis had methodically destroyed the final drafts as the Red Army advanced. However, the captured circulars, matching demographic directives, and key witness testimonies made it an important piece of the legal record. [4] 1. The Main Nuremberg Trial (1945–1946) During the Trial of the Major War Criminals, prosecutors used the administrative footprints of Generalplan Ost to prove a "common plan or conspiracy" to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity. [5] •The Evidence Used: Even without the main blueprint, prosecutors introduced the Meyer-Hetling memoranda (the agricultural and demographic plans drafted for Himmler) and Heinrich Himmler’s May 1940 secret directiveregarding the treatment of alien populations in the East. [1, 6] •The Judgment: The tribunal heavily cited these documents to sentence high-ranking Nazis like Wilhelm Keitel(Head of the Wehrmacht Supreme Command) and Alfred Jodl, proving that the German military leadership knowingly operated in tandem with a pre-planned, deliberate strategy of economic plunder and mass population extermination in Poland and the USSR. [5, 7, 8, 9, 10] 2. The RuSHA Trial (1947–1948) The plan received its most exhaustive, direct legal dissection during Case #8 of the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings, commonly known as the RuSHA Trial (against the SS Race and Settlement Main Office). [3, 11, 12, 13] •The Scope: This trial specifically targeted the SS bureaucrats responsible for executing the racial program. The charges focused entirely on the mechanics of Generalplan Ost: the forcible evacuation of foreign nationals, the plunder of property, and the kidnapping of "racially valuable" children from Poland and the USSR for forced Germanization. [3, 11, 14] •The Breakthrough Witness: A pivotal moment occurred when SS-Obergruppenführer Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski took the stand as a prosecution witness. He testified directly about the inner workings of the plan, confirming under oath that Himmler had explicitly detailed the preliminary versions of Generalplan Ost to his top SS leaders before the invasion of the Soviet Union. He testified that the goal was the elimination of 30 million Slavs. [1, 15] Why Historians Dig Deeper Than the Trials Did Ironically, despite being used as evidence, the true, terrifying scope of Generalplan Ost was somewhat sidelined in the immediate postwar trials. [2] Because the Allied prosecutors at Nuremberg were primarily focused on assigning immediate guilt for concrete, realized atrocities—like the Holocaust, the execution of POWs, and the death camps—they did not fully grasp that Generalplan Ost was meant to be a decades-long colonial project. It was not until the 1990s, when massive amounts of Soviet and East German archives were fully opened, that historians were able to piece together the remaining fragments and realize that the Holocaust and the planned destruction of 50 million Slavs were fundamentally linked parts of the exact same demographic master plan. [2, 16, 17]

@XMulticultural A taboo perspective.

This publisher has an interesting perspective.

Coming soon. holocausthandbooks.com/book/history-a…

This is a documentation on the history and background of the cancerous growth of censorship and persecution of “thought criminals” in the West. It answers vexing questions, such as: How did it all begin? Which countries are spearheading it? Which ideologies are at the root of it? And which population groups are the main drivers? Buckle up, because it ain’t pretty. At the 250th anniversary of the declaration of independence of the United States of America, it is time to renew this pledge of independence and commitment to freedom! Please like, share and repost this video! Links of items mentioned in the video: Pavel Durov, Oslo speech: youtu.be/1Yq_5aDdJ24 Telegram Contest: t.me/contest Video on IMT: rumble.com/v72ildm Swastika Epidemic: youtu.be/wlzq4wHNt2M Swastika Epidemic as KGB false-flag op: jstor.org/content/oa_boo…, pp. 126-129 “Lectures on the Holocaust,” book: holocausthandbooks.com/book/lectures-… Video on History of Skepticism: rumble.com/v75kk0i German Government reports on thought crimes: verfassungsschutzberichte.de “History at Gunpoint,” book: holocausthandbooks.com/book/history-a… “History at Gunpoint,” video: rumble.com/v7ay6qm Stutthof, book: holocausthandbooks.com/book/concentra… Amazon video: rumble.com/v72d4re Amazon book: holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-day-a… Katie Halper on Israel’s genocide: youtu.be/KJnjmH4_KaE Pew Survey: pewresearch.org/journalism/fac… Telegram cooperation with law enforcement: bbc.com/news/articles/… “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” book: holocausthandbooks.com/book/the-chemi… “The Chemistry of Auschwitz,” video: rumble.com/v72d1p4 Shlomo Kramer: youtu.be/7FS06hKUlEo

Revisionist Holocaust Encyclopedia entry of the day: Packing Density, inside Gas Chamber Read the full entry here: holocaustencyclopedia.com/concept/packin…