Ed

9.2K posts

Ed banner
Ed

Ed

@RedbeardEdward

Son of William, Son of Dean, Son of Teddy, Son of Isaac. Presbyterian. Has proven God exists. Believes in the Conspiracy Theory of History. Racism is a Virtue.

Luminiferous aether vortices Katılım Ocak 2021
1.1K Takip Edilen234 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@Notmadtaro @plethonist I think Jesus wasn't jewish, πασχα meant suffering, πρεσβύτερος meant Buddhist, and the old testament was a hoax written in 1520.
2
5
18
7K
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@muddycharm @paramounttactcl As long as you're not ignoring the physical (video) evidence of momentum being applied to Charlie Kirk's t-shirt (NOT bulletproof, as far as we know) whose reaction force launched the projectile which ultimately lodged in his neck, the question remains: what caused that momentum?
English
1
0
0
13
iAmaSamanana
iAmaSamanana@muddycharm·
@RedbeardEdward @paramounttactcl So what? I can get google to say Charlie is still alive Neither is even close to evidence of murder I'm not feigning ignorance im asking you to prove something and you wanna play dumb games.
iAmaSamanana tweet media
English
1
0
0
14
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@muddycharm @paramounttactcl You appear to be having difficulty. Here you go; let me help you. I count six results saying there was a bulletproof vest and four results saying there wasn't. Can you check my count? Can you count to four? Can you count to six? Are you feigning ignorance? Are you ignoring this?
Ed tweet media
English
2
0
0
15
iAmaSamanana
iAmaSamanana@muddycharm·
@RedbeardEdward @paramounttactcl So you dont have anything then? Are you just gunna obfuscate or will you articulate your point? He didnt have a vest, idk who said he did but they were wrong. Next 😂
English
1
0
0
10
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@muddycharm @paramounttactcl >If you have something just say it I'm saying that you are ignoring evidence that's inconvenient for your theory as you are being controlled by your own "anchor bias". >I don't even know who... Everything I saw... Bing "Charlie Kirk bulletproof vest" and read one page of results.
English
1
0
0
17
iAmaSamanana
iAmaSamanana@muddycharm·
@RedbeardEdward @paramounttactcl Lol why do you keep insisting I address your question? 🤔 If you have something just say it I dont even know who you're talking about. Everything I saw said they asked him to wear one and he refused Do you know what an anchor bias is?
English
1
0
0
13
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@muddycharm @paramounttactcl Yes; people were saying he was wearing a vest. Why were they saying that? Don't ignore this question.
English
1
0
0
13
iAmaSamanana
iAmaSamanana@muddycharm·
@RedbeardEdward @paramounttactcl Yeah they wanted him to wear one. It wouldve been helpful for up close pistol rounds. Ultimately I think the shooter was aiming for the head and hit low. You mean people were saying he was wearing a vest? Idk what you mean.. I dont think he ever wore a vest 🤔
English
1
0
0
14
Cinema Shogun
Cinema Shogun@CinemaShogun·
WOW 😮 Candace Owens is now saying that Charlie Kirk might’ve been killed because he refused to kill her‼️ Instead of dialing things back after the preliminary hearing she’s dialing things up with even more outrageous claims than ever. And she’s psychotically referring to herself in the third person while doing so. Her entire fake “investigation” has been all about making Charlie’s death all about herself. She disrespects and smears everyone else grieving his loss including his wife and tries to establish herself as the only one grieving. Now she’s trying to convince her fans that Charlie’s assassination wasn’t even about him. It was all about her. Going so far as to say that Charlie was killed because he wouldn’t help kill her. This is obviously ridiculous for many reasons. But in the eyes of her devoted cultists Candace Owens is the most important figure on earth and they literally believe that she’s dodging assassins daily like John Wick or some sort of action movie star.
English
652
294
2.2K
422.8K
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@muddycharm @paramounttactcl Not that he was wearing one. And "not that it would have made a difference in Wednesday’s shooting." Right? Because he was shot in the neck. So why did people think Charlie Kirk was wearing a bulletproof vest for 70 hours? Don't ignore this question.
English
1
0
0
15
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@TamponTimsTaint @TheeSanDiego45 @CinemaShogun A corollary of Occam's Razor is that, in cases of fraud, the wrong explanation will have been made to appear to be the simplest. Just checking, first: are you ignoring this? x.com/RedbeardEdward…
Ed@RedbeardEdward

@TamponTimsTaint @TheeSanDiego45 @CinemaShogun You aren't ignoring the fact that there was apparently a "ricochet" from Charlie Kirk's t-shirt that looked enough like a bulletproof vest for its existence of to be reported upon and subsequently debunked?

English
0
0
0
23
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@muddycharm @paramounttactcl Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, right? That's why you can see ricochets from bulletproof vests. Oh wait. newsnationnow.com/crime/inside-3… 70(!) hours after the shooting the presence of a bulletproof vest was debunked. That's weird. 70 hours. That's a long time.
English
1
0
0
17
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@TamponTimsTaint @TheeSanDiego45 @CinemaShogun You aren't ignoring the fact that there was apparently a "ricochet" from Charlie Kirk's t-shirt that looked enough like a bulletproof vest for its existence of to be reported upon and subsequently debunked?
English
0
0
0
25
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@paramounttactcl You can know the truth from fiction by first assuming a tremendous quantity of bullshit will be piled on top of the shit that actually happened in order to obscure it. Examine every piece of shit, and if you find an indigestible (inexplicable) kernel, you can be sure: it's corn.
English
0
0
0
21
Ed
Ed@RedbeardEdward·
@TamponTimsTaint @TheeSanDiego45 @CinemaShogun I didn't ask if you watched it, I asked you to link me to what you are referring. If you were referring to something you don't watch, however, I'm curious how you know it exists.
English
1
0
0
15