
Alex
4.9K posts

Alex
@AZolin312
i ❤️ muon tomography and MW dielectric spectroscopy phd cand, phys, chi widely blocked by ufologists



I'm now Lobe-scale confident at 35% McCasland's current activities may intersect with defensive preparations for a metastability event, based on my OP and DMs two astronomers I trust sent in reply to it that semi-confirm my suspicions related to an incoming transient HE neutrino flux burst. It's still an extremely speculative, incredible synthesis based on the intersection of many compounding coincidences without causal links or falsifiable predictions. But I rate it "worthy of further inquiry" rather than "bank" or "dismiss." The fact the only people following McCasland (#UFOTwitter) are too wrapped up with aliens to connect these dots that they normally love to connect is intriguing from an opsec standpoint. Even more speculative: is part of the $200B war appropriation being diverted to a black budget to address a supposed exigency?



I will not support sending South Carolina's sons and daughters to war in Iran. I won't do it. President Trump has been enormously successful so far. But we cannot allow the Washington War Machine to turn Iran into another Iraq.

















I'm going Full Loeb on the McCasland thing. What if a serious incident occurred near Gacrux in 1947, specifically to its theorized companion White Dwarf? (The WD may be sitting at the Chandrasekhar limit based on Gacrux's high barium content.) At 88 ly, we would realize the results of a serious incident (more serious than a type Ia supernova) in 2035. Conventional wisdom suggests there would be no forewarning. However, a month before McCasland stopped communicating, this paper theorizes that may not be true [arxiv.org/html/2501.1584…]. And a new JTF was stood-up at Peterson Space Base the same week [northcom.mil/Newsroom/News/…]. This is a thought experiment only with no claim of veracity. More to come later. Or I might delete this.





