Sabitlenmiş Tweet
🇺🇦 Λddı ⛨
552 posts
🇺🇦 Λddı ⛨
@AddisonBanana
‘0̸8 ִֶָ𓂃 𓉸ִֶָྀི ִֶָ་༘࿐nothing from nowhere、i’m no one at all🩸bibliophile、art acolyte、shoddy writer、anthropology pupil、dead poet、🦉、grasstoucher、overthinker
Wonderland ♥️♠️ Katılım Nisan 2025
151 Takip Edilen231 Takipçiler
@MarsAutomatic @TravH_2 @F_Edits @CosmonautMarcus your choice tips the scale 1 more towards potentially killing up to half the population. or say, even in overwhelming red wins, with 99.99% choosing it, that still results in 830,000 in the world dead. Reds activate the kill switch. Blues deactivate it for all.
English
@TravH_2 @F_Edits @CosmonautMarcus Me choosing to live and you choosing to opt into a game of Russian Roulette is not me killing you.
English
You can argue all you want but Blue Button Gigachads won the vote on every poll and Seething Red Buttoners still have to justify their cowardice
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
@CosmonautMarcus reds need a scarlet letter or a mark of the beast to distinguish them if it isn’t akready apparent by abhorrent behavior
English
@x_MoonlitShade @lunya105 killings only happen if red wins. the less red voters, the safer everyone is.
English
@lunya105 The goal isn’t for 100%, it’s just the simple fact that you have a 0% chance of dying if you press red. Anyone who pressed blue literally did it to themselves.
English
Am I missing something here?? It’s easier to get >50% Blue than 100% Red
Even 1% is 80 million people dead if 99% clicked red. So if the results were switched, that’s 3.5 billion people dead. Society would be in shambles and your life/the world would change drastically :(
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@ACMEngineer @iamthebest015 @my_2cents__ by this very chart it shows that people only die if red wins.
English
Congrats blue voters. We’ve saved EVERYONE unselfishly and unanimously. Even the stupid red voters
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@MisterFalconM @Hesamation if enough equally portion out the Kool-Aid, it will no longer be deadly. bound to be some that drink it;maybe kids, elders w dementia or people who like the color blue. Not all are purely rational or intellectually capable. so do you sit idly by or help out to prevent any deaths?
English
inventing a sacrifice nobody needs
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@TylerDuprey @theramblingfool like, what’s more likely or easier to achieve: there is absolute 100% conformity and agreement and no one dies. or, 51% dont want others to die, and no one dies.
English
@AddisonBanana @theramblingfool 1. If your parents want you to choose blue then they hate you and don’t mind if you die.
2. No one is making it hard to survive.
x.com/untimelysalts/…
essentialsalts@untimelysalts
English
@TylerDuprey @theramblingfool do reds even realize they are adding weight to the crusher, potentially killing others(children included). when instead could be helping lift it up in collective strength and no one dies?
English
English
@theramblingfool I’m fine being a weak coward who lives. You’re more than welcome to die virtuous in return for nothing.
I mean, imagine being your life on the innate goodness of people in 2026 😂😂
English
@TylerDuprey @theramblingfool i would hope to think my parents would choose to protect me and family and others~ leading to the option with the lowest threshold that would result in zerø deaths. i dont wanna be related to ones who actively make it harder for others to survive
English
@theramblingfool Would you encourage your loved ones to push blue?
English
@ACMEngineer @LishaLycoris @theramblingfool do reds even realize they are adding weight to the crusher, potentially killing others(children included). when instead could be helping lift it up in collective strength and no one dies?
English
@theramblingfool @Cary_Bleasdale all the more reason to hit blue to protect the innocent
English
@Cary_Bleasdale Putting on my red button pusher hat, I'd wager they would resort to saying something like "Those are fake people" or "Blue button pressers are children, only children would appeal to characters from stories."
(See my post on cynicism and optimism.)
English
@CoryRockFF @waldenpod if a majority of reds band together they rewrite the blue button from “everyone lives” to “all blues die”. Blue is safer for everyone unless reds mess it up by being selfish and apathetic. If red wins, there’s a guarantee it kills others.
English
@waldenpod The crafty wording is a trick. With a little reasoning you can realize that the blue button is the only dangerous option. Selecting it puts you at risk, and now you’re the one who needs saving which is a burden onto others.
English
ugh you just want to feel morally superior so you choose the option that saves hundreds of millions of human lives 🙄
English
@Keidar02 @KARMAENVY @HighJayster @StubornStalion @ShapestSister @MaractusArgento @lowgradef and by doing so you’ll make it more likely more die. when all that’s needed is a simple majority and no one dies.
English
@KARMAENVY @HighJayster @StubornStalion @ShapestSister @MaractusArgento @lowgradef As soon as you assume other's choices in your argument, it falls apart. You don't know the outcome, so you must choose based on ALL OUTCOMES which, for me, makes red the obvious choice.
English
@ExodusPrimal @MrBeast blue only needs to get 51% to get the best outcome (zerø die)
English
@MrBeast THIS THOUGHT EXPERIMENT IS MEANT ONLY TO INCITE CONFLICT.
RED IS LOGIC, BLUE IS MORALS, BUT IT'S A PARADOX.
RED GETTING 100% CHOSEN IS ILLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.
BLUE GETTING 100% CHOSEN IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT BEING FORCED TO CHOOSE IT, BEING IMMORAL.
The only choice is NOT to.
English
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English
@WelsonWarlock @matterasmachine @MrBeast more like everyone is holding up the crusher, a strong majority, preventing it from killing anyone. but reds chicken out fleeing and stop helping. until there’s not enough collective strength and minority get crushed. Reds actively choose to let others die.
English
@YourBestSpinel does Lapis count? haha. draining the oceans.
or Peridot, Steven is good at converting antagonists into allies. a running theme.
my traditional answer would be Emerald. not many mentions. brief appearance but a great dynamic with Lars. can’t wait for Lars of the Stars series 🟩🩷
English
Who is your favorite Antagonist in Steven Universe and why? (Not limited to only the ones below obviously)
#StevenUniverse
English
@vrballknowervr @FlamingkittyU @LumLotus so what would result in the least amount of realistic deaths? 98% red, and 2% blue dies. or 49% red and 51% blue no one dies. it’s easier to have > 50% decide than it is to have = 100% agree. reds want absolute conformity or will cause others to die
English
@FlamingkittyU @LumLotus Obviously some people will press blue. That doesnt mean they arent the ones introducing death into the equation😭
English
New point that doesn't make sense from Blue.
I still don't understand how it's "Red's fault" for Blue's irrational actions.
𝔏𝔲𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔢𝔯𝔳𝔞@LumLotus
Using AI to make others understand what happened with the blue and red button thing.
English
🇺🇦 Λddı ⛨ retweetledi
Both red and blue have risk. If red has majority the world collapses from all the selfless people in blue dying and society collapsing. The argument is always going to be everyone vote blue or countless people will die regardless. Chosing selfish safe red isn't actually safe, just risking catastrophe as long as it's not your immediate death. Everyone voting blue puts a bit more risk on themselves for the greater good of aiming to keep every single person alive. And clearly the majority is voting for blue in every poll because that's what everyone gets. Ensuring everyone lives is the moral choice because some people will always vote blue to protect the whole so everyone votes blue to protect everyone. Voting red is the fearful approach that disregards human life and future consequences.
English
