Adele Raemer 🎗️ Zioness_on_the_Border

Hate Israel all you want but one thing is absolutely, abundantly clear after the rescue of the American pilots and as this war has proceeded: No other ally in the world today actively assists the US as Israel does. They are the truest ally in every sense of the word. NATO won't even let the US fly through their airspace. Israel? They'll put their own pilots in the line of fire to rescue an American. That's allyship.

« J'ai un profond respect pour les soldats américains et israéliens qui risquent leur vie pour lutter contre ce régime iranien. J'ai aussi beaucoup d'admiration pour le peuple israélien qui vit sous les bombes. Contrairement à Emmanuel Macron, ils sont du bon côté de l'histoire.»

Wow. Douglas Murray. A single minute. Give yourself a single minute to listen to this. This man is something else 👏🏽

Genocide has a a specific , strict and meaningful definition in international law. It’s a fact that no country, as a country, has ever been convicted for genocide. Not Cambodia, Not the former Yugoslavia. Not Yemen, Not Sudan. Not Syria. Israel won’t be the first. Today it seems “genocide” means anything that the left disagrees with. Do you agree? If “genocide” now simply means “a war you disapprove of”, then the term is finished — and with it the legal architecture built after 1945 to prevent actual extermination campaigns. Genocide was never a slogan. It was a narrowly defined crime, anchored in intent, evidence and legal thresholds. Strip those away and you are not strengthening human rights. You are vandalising them. In Gaza, the cause of death of Palestinians must be the only outcome of the genocidal intent. But Hamas has been fighting and holding hostages and hiding behind its own Palestinian constituents. You see the problem? If there is a war, civilians die. That’s a tragedy as long as human history. But if their deaths is not because of an exclusive intent to kill it isn’t genocide. What is happening here is not a legal argument. It is a political strategy. Brand the Jewish state genocidal often enough and legitimacy itself becomes the target. The accusation is no longer about conduct in a specific conflict. It is about erasing the only Jewish state’s moral standing altogether. If every asymmetrical war is recast as genocide, then any democracy fighting a non-state actor can be declared criminal by volume of rhetoric alone. Once intent, context and proportionality are treated as optional, the law and UN institutions become a meaningless form of activism. What we need from the UN is legal clarity and consistent interpretation. When the UN has one set of legal statements for all the countries and a separate legal framework for Israel we know what it means. It means 65% of UN members are not democratic and the UN has given up to bad actors to eliminate the state of Israel. The irony is clear: in the name of protecting the international system, its most loaded legal term is being diluted beyond recognition. That does not defend the post-1945 order. It corrodes it from within.

Iranian parliament speaker brags about striking residential buildings: “If the Israeli regime fails to intercept the missiles in the highly protected Dimona area, it is operationally a sign of entering a new phase of the battle: Israel's skies are defenseless. As a result, it seems the time has come to implement the next pre-designed plans. Happy Nowruz to the Iranian nation.”