
I read a study last week that made me pause – it analyzed conversations and concluded that churn is not a Customer Success problem. 😳
The top reasons?
28% product gaps.
26% poor customer experience.
25% sales and marketing overpromising.
10% implementation failures.
Almost 75% tied to those first three buckets.
The easy takeaway is this: “See? It’s a product. It’s sales. It’s not CS.”
I don’t buy that.
In fact, I think that mindset is exactly why churn happens.
1️⃣ When someone says “product gap,” what they’re really saying is the product team didn’t fully understand the customer’s real workflow, real friction, real desired outcome.
And who lives closest to that reality every single day?
Customer Success.
Your CSMs are in the trenches. They see where users drop off. They should know which features customers ignore and which hacks they create outside your product.
If that insight never makes it into product decisions, that’s not just a product problem.
Product managers live in prioritization frameworks and roadmaps.
But Customer Success lives in the customer’s world.
As a CSM, your job is not to “file a ticket and hope.”
Your job is to fight for improvement. To connect one feature request into a pattern across 10 accounts. To tell the bigger story.
That’s influence.
2️⃣ Now let’s talk about implementation failures.
Did we truly implement their workflow? Or did we just run training sessions and call it onboarding?
Customers don’t have time to learn your product deeply. You do. You’re the expert. So why are we expecting them to do the heavy lifting?
Real Customer Success is not feature education. It’s outcome implementation.
3️⃣ Now, sales overpromising. It’s easy to roll your eyes and say, “Sales sold something we don’t have.”
But I’ve rarely seen sales promise something completely detached from reality.
Most of the time, it’s adjacent. It’s a stretch. It’s an outcome that feels possible.
So the real question becomes: do we understand what was promised? Was it a feature? Or was it a result?
If it was a result, can we creatively deliver it another way? Can we configure differently? Can we combine workflows? Can we influence product to close the gap for a broader segment?
Again, that requires ownership.
Churn doesn’t belong to one department. It belongs to the company.
But if Customer Success sits at the intersection of product, sales, and the customer, then CS has more leverage than anyone else to reduce it.
Not by working harder.
But by influencing better.
By doing deeper discovery.
By understanding what customers do before your product and after your product.
By mapping the five other tools they use.
And then by selling that insight internally.
Because if you don’t sell the problem inside your company, it will never get prioritized.
The CS team shouldn't be ticket passers. They should be outcome champions.
The better question is: Why are you still debating org charts vs owning the customer’s outcomes?
English






