Adyn

@Lightningisgone @AFL Tbf at Adelaide oval it is hard for umpires there, always favour them there

@AFL The umpires are just getting worse and worse and it’s just round 2.

DOGS WIN AN ABSOLUTE THRILLER! #AFLCrowsDogs

@drizzlx1 @AntoniiioCOW @TheProjectZO Wat else is new

@AntoniiioCOW @TheProjectZO I SOLD SO BAD

like ig 23rd w/@drizzlx1

@mikeyjj @aleaguemen Wow I didn’t see that, if that’s the case defintely wrong.

@Adynrr @aleaguemen If we’re going to stick to the law - How do we kick off after an Adelaide goal and then have a VAR offside call?

UNBELIEVABLE. ADELAIDE UNITED WIN AN ORIGINAL RIVALRY FOR THE AGES IN THE 97TH MINUTE 🔴🔥 After TWO disallowed goals, Reds legend Ryan Kitto seals a famous victory in front of the Red Army.

@MilosPilipovic_ @jakecam98_ @VinceRugari Unfortunately the ai is trying to extrapolate the rules, there is nowhere in law 11 stating the keeper must be able to have a genuine attempt on the ball, just that they affect on being able to play the ball. Shit rule, but keevers got it right.

@Adynrr @jakecam98_ @VinceRugari Definitely wast followed. That’s why I stated the distance. The keeper was in bad positions the player was not close to him, keeper had no chance it’s not offside.

That’s a joke of a decision. You can’t be serious. #ADLvMVC

@mikeyjj @aleaguemen Yes ur right, no one complained because it should be a goal based on spirit of the game. This law is unfortunately clear and obvious, as silly as it is.

@Adynrr @aleaguemen For me - Look at every player on the pitch. Not ONE Adelaide player or the keeper complained at the time. The VAR decided to intervene into a situation that was not ‘clear and obvious’.

@MilosPilipovic_ @jakecam98_ @VinceRugari The rule unfortunately was followed, it’s just a shit rule that it doesn’t have a reasonability clause

@jakecam98_ @VinceRugari No it’s not. There is a distance to it he was not even close to the keeper and the keeper did not have any chance of saving it. Those are the facts. Now you can claim offside from a halfway heavenly if someone is offside 30 metres ahead in his line of vision then

@mikeyjj @aleaguemen Unfortunately the rule is the problem, ref got it right based off them. Utter confusion the line of vision rule is

@aleaguemen Awful refereeing for both sides! How do you kick off after a goal and then come back for an offside? Isn’t that against the laws of the game? Let alone that garbage decision to chalk off the Victory goal. Good game let down with an absolute shit shoe from your side!

@cleary_mitch @7NewsMelbourne @7AFL Elliot for Curnow, thats not too bad.

Carlton has asked the question of Collingwood free agent Jamie Elliott who is also considering strong interest from Gold Coast. Any Blues move for Elliott would not offset the compensation for Tom De Koning given the size of TDK’s St Kilda deal @7NewsMelbourne @7AFL

@AFL Hardwick must own the afl

Who wins the Brownlow from here? 🏅

@seanievenieks @AFL_LOTG @outbreezyWC Have a read of this lol

@Adynrr @AFL_LOTG @outbreezyWC Hey mate, look at Law 18.5.3 as well 👍🏼 18.5.3 Permitted Contact Incidental contact in a Marking contest will be permitted if the Player’s sole objective is to contest or spoil a Mark.

Elliott does not receive a free kick for front on contact #AFLPiesLions

@flagswans26 @Dion_Winduss @FOXFOOTY Interpretation is an extremely big factor which you are missing here. Have a nice day! (Ps not a legal document!)

"HE FROZE. THE UMPIRE FROZE" 🥶 It could've - maybe should've - been the free kick that got Collingwood within a goal with 10 minutes left in the prelim. Instead, on a rollercoaster night of decisions by the whistle-blowers, Magpies fans were left incensed by a non-call that proved the tipping point. DETAILS >> bit.ly/4nDfzvA

@securitron_eth @FOXFOOTY Definitely were! Your non response to my part pretty much proves my point.

@Adynrr @FOXFOOTY The one where the Lions were by far the better team.

@AFL_LOTG @outbreezyWC Hey mate, look at part (b) of this rule aswell.

@outbreezyWC 18.5.2 Free Kicks - Marking Contests A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick in a Marking contest against a Player where the Player: (d) makes contact to an opposition Player from front-on and whose sole objective is not to contest or spoil a Mark

@Dion_Winduss @flagswans26 @FOXFOOTY Hey mate, (b) and (c) could both apply in this case. Have a nice day!

@flagswans26 @FOXFOOTY Here are the rules. Correct play on call

@securitron_eth @FOXFOOTY Not sure what game you were watching where 50/50 went Collingwood’s way lol, first quarter was shambolic

@FOXFOOTY This is so laughable after Collingwood got the bulk of the 50/50’s all game and got absolutely dragged into it by the umps in the second quarter. If they get it right then they get done by 50+.

@DrG2020V @brent_119 @FOXFOOTY Did u miss the part where he completely goes through him? Even if he does cleanly spoil, which in my opinion he doesn’t. It’s still a free kick

@brent_119 @FOXFOOTY Perfect spoil

"That's a free kick every day of the week." It's getting chaotic now, and EVERYONE is getting tense 😬 📺 Watch #AFLPiesLions on ch.504 or stream on Kayo: bit.ly/45P9hTP ✍️ BLOG bit.ly/4gGntlW 🔢 MATCH CENTRE bit.ly/4naAI0m

@BonoboBeau @stellacats14 @FOXFOOTY Yeah u wanna back up what ur saying?

@stellacats14 @FOXFOOTY Learn the rules.

@SwoopLuke Somehow I got 126, first time I’ve been under 10,000 lol.

love a ticketek queue