Aftyn

@it_a_me_knowlzy Everyone clicking red would solve it yes, but in any realistic situation that's never going to happen. Thus making a blue win the only way in which everyone survives.

Is this some weird ass litmus test or something? Everyone pressing red solves the whole thing I think? Am I being punked?

@DekuTier14598 @Mantis_Religios @CapsuleCorpKami @purplepIuto Crazy concept here but people dying is generally not a good thing

@Mantis_Religios @CapsuleCorpKami @purplepIuto Why would i want to save stupid people and retard? Give me on one good reason.

Guilt tripping everyone to pick blue when they can just all pick red is hilarious lmao

@Flobertou >everybody survives >somehow gets mad about it They just really want people to die I guess

Why are red button pressers mad that they lose tho like you win ethier way bruh 😭

@0xmitsurii Not being able to cure someone isn't the same as not being able to help them

Psychiatrists when asked how many patients have they cured.

@TBoohbah @MattRichards82 @depression2019 There's a reasonable argument to be made that pressing red would make you complicit in mass genocide, in which case clicking blue would also be the moral decision

It is actually disturbing how dumb the average person is Red gives you a 100% chance of living, you literally get nothing beneficial out of choosing blue

@acklespaws I knew a guy with breath like that in highschool

even soldier boy was like yeah my son is NOT going out like that 😭 #theboys

@MattRichards82 @depression2019 Again, I reiterate: The results of the outcome have been that everybody survives. Instead of celebrating, we go through mental gymnastics to somehow pretend that's a bad thing.

Because it is logically retarded to even consider pushing BLUE. People that don't think through it don't understand that... It's simply a wording trick! Here's a different way of asking that same question: There are two buttons. Everyone that presses red will survive. People that press blue will only survive if more than half of you press it, but red buttons pushers will stay alive either way. What do you choose now? Not a single person chooses blue now, just because of wording.

@dzeeff This is one for the history books

Yugi: you can't defeat me, kaiba! Kaiba using chatgpt: you're not just a 3rd rate duelist, you also have a fourth rate deck

@utaracunda @TheSkepticWiz Adapting to changes *is* evolution. Evolution isn't restricted to when one species evolves into another. It's defined as any change in heritable characteristics of a biological population over time, no matter how small those changes are.

@utaracunda @TheSkepticWiz Sure! Tragopogon miscellus is a species that came into existence in the 20th century, and in a lab setting scientists produced a new species of fruitfly that was reproductively isolated from the species they started with. However, 1/2

@utaracunda @TheSkepticWiz It has been observed both in a lab setting and natural setting countless times!

@TheSkepticWiz observed? every time someone asks why can't we see it in action: well, because it takes millions of years..

@remoteviewer420 @TheSkepticWiz Evolution has nothing to do with "getting life from non-life" or getting "something from nothing". Evolution is about the change of organisms over time, but what you're talking about is abiogenesis which is different field entirely.

@TheSkepticWiz You can never get life from non-life. Chaos can never breed conformity. And you can never get something from nothing.

@ProfessorGripph @if_at_alll This is very common for fish in general, not specific to sunfish. Most fish will produce hundreds, if not thousands, of offspring under the pretence that a large portion are expected to die early. The fish who don't follow this principle are moreso the exception to the rule

@AftynOSRS @if_at_alll The majority of them actually don't grow. They are tiny little useless things that can hardly even swim or feed themselves and if they defy the odds and do grow... its not a pleasant existence there either.

The Most Defenseless Creature in The Sea.

@JessePrker They all look so happy! Great job

Judged my first event last weekend! 👨‍⚖️

@Olu_Utd14 Any way to scientifically test the existence of god in a way that's falsifiable. Specifically what that'd entail, I don't know, but if God existed they'd know, and if they'd want to convert me they'd show me

As an atheist, what kind of proof would actually make me believe in your god? I can think of a few things that would genuinely get my attention… A real resurrection, for example, no tricks, no ambiguity, something clearly verified…Or something like an amputated limb instantly growing back again, no deception, no room for doubt…Yeah… something like that would be convincing…Not heaven/hell BS!

@ChristiansSTDT The crazy thing is that their single example, a giraffe, has a laryngeal nerve whose structure only makes sense through evolution and would be considered massively inefficient if explicitly designed

There is zero evidence of biblical anything. Learn science and catch up.

@Dexerto I could have detected those too

A US airport sniffer dog detected over 100 pork and chicken sandwiches from 7-Eleven in Thailand Merla found the snacks hidden in a passenger's luggage, which were later destroyed

@ashIyne 5 is a good start but you can go further

is eating 5 yogurt cups a day normal if not is it safe