Agnost
591 posts

Agnost retweetledi

Gross incompetence? Fraudulent promotion? I hope as a CFA you know, Tasha, that an investment recommendation must be made with a reasonable basis. Otherwise you lose your charter for violating the Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics. A $7-$10.9 trillion market cap expected range by 2029 makes ARK perhaps the biggest charlatan of the modern era of fleecing the retail investor. Apple, Microsoft and Nvidia are today valued at “only” $9.6 trillion. The whole S&P is valued at $44 trillion and 24 times forward earnings. Your 2029 4.1% free cash yield suggests a 24 multiple to earnings for the car company, suggesting $450 billion in 2029 profits (today’s REVENUES are $95 billion). Holy delusion, Batman. You couldn’t help yourself by topping last year’s ridiculous predictions by 25% despite flat revenues and fast-declining margins and profits.
This one is is a doozy: “Our research suggests that generalizable humanoid robots represent a ~$24 trillion global revenue opportunity at scale.” You do realize the entirety of global GDP is just over $100 trillion?
That Tesla Insurance continues to make an appearance in your factually devoid analysis brings humor to the entire episode of the promotion of your book and the car company. Suggesting the insurance business will be nearly as large as Progressive is today? Have you seen the 40% operating losses on the so minuscule book of auto insurance that it doesn’t merit mention in the company’s financial statements? Three years ago you predicted a 40% operating profit in insurance. I guess you meant losses, which actually makes sense.
Not sure why @SECEnfDirector hasn’t descended on ARK’s offices in St. Pete or why @CFAinstitute is apparently disinterested in investigating a lack of reasonable basis in your “research” but one thing remains - ARK sure does know how to put a spin on the promote while eviscerating retail investment capital. At least you guys have gotten rich with more than $400 million in management fees while losing literally tens of billions. Grifters gonna grift.
Tasha Keeney@TashaARK
Our updated Tesla model is now out! ark-invest.com/articles/valua… Autonomous driving likely will be one of the most life-changing AI unlocks in history, and quite meaningful for Tesla shareholders:
English

@SILVERnBOLD Inspiring. I smell a great LinkedIn influencer career ahead.
English
Agnost retweetledi

@molly0xFFF Niche forums and communities outside giant websites.
People creating things without monetization strategies.
English

Surely there's a principle about not running your mouth on shit you're not qualified to have an opinion about?
unusual_whales@unusual_whales
BREAKING: There's now a 50% chance of world war as the Israel-Hamas conflict threatens to spread, hedge fund billionaire Ray Dalio has said.
English

@TrungTPhan It would have been more interesting to see more of this rather than whatever was shown in 70% of Oppenheimer.
English

In “Oppenheimer”, General Leslie Groves (Matt Damon) doesn’t get a ton of screen time.
From the film, you know he can make anything happen but don’t see many specific examples.
Here is one: Groves’ team negotiated with the US Treasury to borrow 13,000+ tons of silver (~$8B in 2023) and melted it to make metal coils.
The Manhattan Project scientist needed coils for electromagnets and there was a national shortage of the preferred metal — copper — in 1942.
According to “The Making of the Atomic Bomb” by Richard Rhodes, Groves tasked Col. Kenneth Nichols to secure 5,000 to 10,000 tons of silver from the Treasury as a copper substitute.
After hearing the request, the Treasury gave an “icy reply” and said “we do not speak of tons of silver; our unit is the Troy ounce.”
Groves eventually returned the entire amount of silver with only a few Troy ounces lost.
Nichols later said of Grove:
“The biggest son-of-a-bitch I’ve ever met in my life, but also one of the most capable individuals. He had an ego second to none, he had tireless energy—he was a big man, a heavy man but he never seemed to tire. He had absolute confidence in his decisions and he was absolutely ruthless in how he approached a problem to get it done.
But that was the beauty of working for him—that you never had to worry about the decisions being made or what it meant. In fact I’ve often thought that if I were to have to do my part all over again, I would select Groves as boss. I hated his guts and so did everybody else but we had our form of understanding.”

English

@MosquitoCapital @buccocapital Google used to have one. Advertisers spending dozens of millions got permabanned for advertising legal but morally bankrupt products.
English

@buccocapital I would love to see real examples of organizations who have ethics departments with teeth/power, even when the company is making money hand over fist
English

Some people should go watch Glass Onion and reflect for a bit.
Dave Rubin@RubinReport
Will share more in bit but have to catch a flight. On a personal note Elon is funny as hell, laughs a ton and it’s just really obvious he cares about Twitter because he cares about free speech and the bigger problems facing the world. He doesn’t need this headache, he chose it.
English
Agnost retweetledi
Agnost retweetledi
Agnost retweetledi
Agnost retweetledi
Agnost retweetledi
Agnost retweetledi










