Aidnes

112.1K posts

Aidnes banner
Aidnes

Aidnes

@AidnesSanchez

Trabajo remoto | B2B SaaS Ps: tengo un canal en Insta para trabajos remotos - únete: https://t.co/v4j46rd4RQ

Katılım Eylül 2009
972 Takip Edilen20.4K Takipçiler
Aidnes
Aidnes@AidnesSanchez·
Vengo a QUEJARME: ¡¿cómo que productos de Skincare que en Europa/USA cuestan aprox $20 USD... en Venezuela cuestan $88?!
Español
66
102
983
45.8K
Aidnes
Aidnes@AidnesSanchez·
Pensé que la primera reunión de Therians sería en Barinas...
Aidnes tweet media
Español
0
0
5
621
Aidnes
Aidnes@AidnesSanchez·
This is not going to be used mainly for Dogs, in case that's not quite clear.
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Ring paid somewhere between $8 and $10 million for a 30-second Super Bowl spot to tell 120 million viewers that their cameras now scan neighborhoods using AI. The math is wild. Ring has roughly 20 million devices in American homes. Search Party is enabled by default. The opt-out rate on default settings in consumer tech is historically around 5%. So approximately 19 million cameras are now running AI pattern matching on anything that moves past your front door. Today the target is dogs. The same infrastructure already handles “Familiar Faces,” which builds biometric profiles of every person your camera sees, whether they know about it or not. Ring settled with the FTC for $5.8 million after employees had unrestricted access to customers’ bedroom and bathroom footage for years. They’re now partnered with Flock Safety, which routes footage to local law enforcement. ICE has accessed Flock data through local police departments acting as intermediaries. Senator Markey’s investigation found Ring’s privacy protections only apply to device owners. If you’re a neighbor, a delivery driver, a passerby, you have no rights and no recourse. This tells you everything about Amazon’s actual product. The customer paid for the camera. The customer pays the electricity. The customer pays the $3.99/month subscription. And Amazon gets a surveillance grid that would cost tens of billions to build from scratch, with an AI layer activated by default, and a law enforcement pipeline already connected. They wrapped all of that in a lost puppy commercial because that’s the only version of this story anyone would willingly opt into.

English
0
0
0
166
Aidnes retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
This is being read as a philosophical farewell. It’s a resignation letter from the head of Anthropic’s Safeguards Research Team, and the most important sentence is buried in paragraph three. “I’ve repeatedly seen how hard it is to truly let our values govern our actions. I’ve seen this within myself, within the organization, where we constantly face pressures to set aside what matters most.” That’s the person responsible for keeping Claude safe telling you the pressures to ship are winning. Mrinank Sharma built the Constitutional Classifiers system, developed defenses against AI-assisted bioterrorism, and authored one of the first AI safety cases ever written. Two years of work at the exact intersection of “make the model safe” and “ship the model fast.” And he just walked away. Now zoom out. Dylan Scandinaro, another Anthropic AI safety researcher, left last week to become OpenAI’s Head of Preparedness. Harsh Mehta and Behnam Neyshabur, both senior technical staff, also departed in the past two weeks. Four notable exits in a single month from the company that sells itself as the responsible AI lab. Meanwhile, Anthropic is in talks to raise at a $350B valuation and just launched Opus 4.6 last Thursday. The commercial engine is accelerating. The safety talent is dispersing. This is the core tension of every AI company right now: the people building the guardrails and the people building the revenue targets occupy the same org chart, but they optimize for different variables. When the pressure to scale wins enough internal battles, the safety people don’t fight forever. They leave and write beautifully worded letters about integrity. Sharma’s next move tells you everything. He’s pursuing a poetry degree. When your head of safeguards research decides the most authentic use of his time is writing poems instead of writing safety cases, that’s a signal about what he believes the safety cases were actually accomplishing.
mrinank@MrinankSharma

Today is my last day at Anthropic. I resigned. Here is the letter I shared with my colleagues, explaining my decision.

English
131
788
4.3K
602.7K
Aidnes retweetledi
Elmo
Elmo@elmo·
That Bunny was AMAZING. Elmo thinks he should be called Good Bunny! Elmo loves you, Mr. Good Bunny! ❤️🎶🐰
English
5K
112.4K
911.5K
14.3M
Aidnes retweetledi
Makena
Makena@makenalx·
Ella es tan real por esto.
Makena tweet media
Español
3
3K
42.3K
301K
Aidnes
Aidnes@AidnesSanchez·
Que bonito todo, que belleza en lo que se convirtió ese carajo. 10/10 character development arch.
Español
0
0
2
423
Aidnes
Aidnes@AidnesSanchez·
Si su hija sufre y llora, es por el Halftime Show de Bad Bunny, señora.
Español
1
2
7
801
Aidnes retweetledi
Mouad
Mouad@nadzi_mouad·
Okay so I need to talk about what’s happening with Yann LeCun because this is genuinely one of the wildest exits I’ve ever seen in tech. For those who don’t know—LeCun is one of the “godfathers of AI.” Not a marketing title. The man literally won the Turing Award (basically the Nobel Prize of computer science) for helping invent deep learning. He’s been at Meta for over a decade as their Chief AI Scientist. An absolute legend. So here’s what happened. Zuckerberg got frustrated. Llama wasn’t moving fast enough. The AI race was heating up and Meta felt like it was falling behind. So what does Zuck do? He drops $14 BILLION on Scale AI and hires its 28-year-old co-founder, Alexandr Wang, to run a brand new “Superintelligence Lab.” And then—and this is the part that still blows my mind—he makes Wang… LeCun’s boss. Think about that for a second. A 65-year-old Turing Award winner. Four decades of groundbreaking research. The guy who helped BUILD this entire field. Now reporting to someone whose company… labels data. (Scale AI is impressive, don’t get me wrong, but they don’t actually build AI models. They annotate training data for other companies.) LeCun just did an interview with the Financial Times and honestly? He chose violence. Called Wang “young” and “inexperienced.” Said he has “no experience with research or how you practice research, how you do it. Or what would be attractive or repulsive to a researcher.” And then dropped this absolute gem: “You don’t tell a researcher what to do. You certainly don’t tell a researcher like me what to do.” I mean. The man said what he said. But wait—it gets better. Or worse, depending on how you look at it. LeCun straight up confirmed that Meta’s team “fudged” the Llama 4 benchmark results. Like, actually manipulated them. Used different models on different tests to make the numbers look better. Remember when everyone was suspicious about those benchmarks back in April? Yeah. Turns out they were right to be. Apparently Zuckerberg was furious when this came out internally. LeCun says he “lost confidence in everyone who was involved” and basically sidelined the entire GenAI team. And here’s the thing that really gets me—LeCun has been saying for YEARS that LLMs are a “dead end.” That you can’t get to real intelligence just by predicting the next word. That we need “world models” that actually understand physical reality, not just language patterns. Everyone at Meta wanted him to stop saying this publicly. Bad for the narrative, you know? But LeCun refused. His exact words: “I’m not gonna change my mind because some dude thinks I’m wrong. I’m not wrong.” That’s not arrogance. That’s a scientist who’s seen enough hype cycles to know when something doesn’t add up. So now he’s out. Launching his own company called AMI Labs—Advanced Machine Intelligence. They’re targeting a $3 billion valuation. Building those world models he’s been talking about. Says he’ll have a “baby version” ready within a year. Oh, and apparently French President Macron personally texted him after the news dropped. LeCun won’t say what the message said but like… the man is getting DMs from heads of state now. I don’t know if LeCun is right about everything. Maybe LLMs will surprise us. Maybe Meta will figure it out. But when one of the three people who literally invented modern AI walks out the door saying your entire strategy is fundamentally flawed? I don’t know man. I’d at least ask some questions. The AI wars just got very, very interesting
Mouad tweet mediaMouad tweet media
English
477
1.8K
14.3K
1.3M
Aidnes retweetledi
Softboy
Softboy@softboywin·
Apple music should be free on iPhones.
English
1.5K
63.2K
569.5K
14.1M
🫧🪸🌊
🫧🪸🌊@dramaticassie·
Bebé en serio tú crees que este es el momento adecuado para chancear?
Español
2
4
9
823