Muhammad Akram

821 posts

Muhammad Akram banner
Muhammad Akram

Muhammad Akram

@Akram007biochem

Poet (under process)

Baramula Katılım Temmuz 2018
698 Takip Edilen798 Takipçiler
Muhammad Akram retweetledi
Kashmir Writers' Association
Kashmir Writers' Association@kashmir_writes9·
KWA members of Unit Baramulla participated in the ongoing Mega Padyatra against drugs, led by Hon’ble Lieutenant Governor Shri Manoj Sinha in district Baramulla. Our organization, KWA, remains committed to serving society in the best possible manner and fighting against all forms of social evils. @DCBaramulla @OfficeOfLGJandK @NMBA_MSJE @NashamuktB @PMOIndia @HMOIndia @GreaterKashmir @RisingKashmir @KashmirLife
English
50
58
84
9K
Muhammad Akram retweetledi
Douglas A. Boneparth
Douglas A. Boneparth@dougboneparth·
So if Iran decides to blockade our blockade of their blockade, we will just have to blockade their blockade of our blockade blockading their blockade.
English
1.3K
4.6K
22.5K
703.4K
Muhammad Akram retweetledi
Kashmir Writers' Association
Kashmir Writers' Association@kashmir_writes9·
Excessive rainfall in Kashmir is a major concern for farmers. To tackle this, the government has established several rainwater harvesting schemes in the Valley, such as rooftop water storage and pond systems. These enable rainwater to be stored for future use while also protecting crops from potential damage. The department also emphasizes minimizing dependence on chemical fertilizers and promoting the use of organic fertilizers for healthier, more sustainable, and higher-quality crop production. @weatherchannel @CNNweather @JandKTourism @GreaterKashmir @RisingKashmir @KashmirLife @Kashmir_Monitor
English
60
65
97
23.9K
Muhammad Akram retweetledi
Parth MN
Parth MN@parthpunter·
"I don't talk with anyone who denies [Gaza genocide]." ~ Stephen Kapos, an 88 year old Holocaust survivor to @zeteo_news Guess he's antisemitic too
English
5
226
608
7.8K
Muhammad Akram retweetledi
Kashmir Writers' Association
Kashmir Writers' Association@kashmir_writes9·
North Kashmir Gazette, an initiative of the Kashmir Writers Association, 3rd issue on The Unchartered Valleys, is likely to be released. @OfficeOfLGJandK
Kashmir Writers' Association tweet media
English
70
65
99
23.9K
Muhammad Akram retweetledi
Kashmir Writers' Association
Kashmir Writers' Association@kashmir_writes9·
He did not seek greatness. He pursued excellence and became a symbol of what India can be. An insightful article on the life and legacy of A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, the Missile Man of India, whose pursuit of excellence continues to inspire generations. Read here: globalkashmir.net/opinion-apj-ab… @IndiaToday @PMOIndia @rashtrapatibhvn @timesofindia @HMOIndia @makeinindia @AKTU_Lucknow @ABPNews @GreaterKashmir @RisingKashmir
Kashmir Writers' Association tweet media
English
80
53
89
38.8K
Muhammad Akram retweetledi
Kashmir Writers' Association
Kashmir Writers' Association@kashmir_writes9·
Kashmir Writers' Association is proud to introduce a young author, Anzar Fayaz from Bijbehara, South Kashmir, and to honor him for his book Anzira (Awareness). The young and energetic writer has successfully highlighted multiple social issues through his work. KWA is committed to providing a platform for budding writers across Kashmir. We, at KWA, are also working for the growth and development of the intelligent youth of Kashmir by offering them various platforms to showcase their talent. @AikRamz @bookpoets @timesofindia @India_Builds @indiabookrecord @Author @AuthorNetwork @GreaterKashmir @RisingKashmir @KashmirLife @Kashmir_Monitor
English
87
65
119
37.3K
Nirupama Menon Rao 🇮🇳
Nirupama Menon Rao 🇮🇳@NMenonRao·
There is something revealing about arguments and insinuations that cannot engage with an idea on its merits and must instead invent motives to dismiss it. I have absolutely no interest in “jobs”, patronage, or relevance-seeking. I have had the privilege of serving my country, and I continue to lead, at age 75, a very full, happy and engaged life in writing, music, and public thought and with my ever supportive family. I neither seek nor need validation from those who reduce public engagement to self-interest. Least of all from commentary that confuses fatuous insinuation with analysis. A women’s caucus between India and Pakistan is not a “career move”. It is an attempt—one among many possible—to widen the space for reflection, reduce the temperature of discourse, and explore pathways that official channels cannot always pursue. It requires neither approval nor endorsement from you, who see the world only through binaries of strength and weakness. To conflate dialogue with complicity, or citizen engagement with opportunism, is to misunderstand the very nature of statecraft. Serious nations do not fear conversation; they use it, alongside deterrence, to manage adversaries and prevent escalation. Dismissing every effort at engagement as “self-interest” may be rhetorically satisfying, but it is intellectually thin. It replaces analysis with suspicion, and complexity with caricature. Not every initiative requires your permission. And not every idea you disagree with is a conspiracy. The reference to Brown University is entirely false and I will not allow it to stand. I was invited to join the India Initiative on my own merit; the Government of India had no role in that appointment and provided no funding for the Initiative. It is also incorrect to suggest any sequencing of “post-retirement placement” linked to my ambassadorship. I retired as Foreign Secretary in 2011 and subsequently served after retirement as Ambassador to the United States. To construct a narrative of influence or patronage on this basis is to rely on invention, not fact. Facts matter. Repeating false assertions after they have been corrected risks crossing from comment into defamation. Please be aware.
English
45
54
231
11.2K
Akhilesh Mishra
Akhilesh Mishra@amishra77·
There are various ways to look at this post. One obvious way people are looking at is the naivety or cluelessness of our elite foreign policy mandarins that, despite galactic evidence to the contrary, they still think Pakistan is amenable to reason or talks. If you look at it closely, it is not naivety. Or cluelessness. Or reason amid chaos. Or a calm and sensible approach. It is, instead, plain and simple self-interest, even if it compromises national interest. All these formulations to somehow engage Pakistan serve just one cause: self-interest of conflict entrepreneurs. 1. Think of Kashmir and the galaxy of 'experts' who had mushroomed - from 'Interlocutors' to Hurriyat types, and from TV anchors to assorted busybodies in conferences - who presumed to solve the internal dimension of Kashmir for us. For decades they existed, and yet Kashmir festered. Local terrorists thrived; stone pelting was the only form of communication; schools closed; local elected bodies were non-existent. The day we (Modi Government) stopped listening to them is the day we succeeded. Article 370 done and dusted. Ladakh converted into a separate UT. Hurriyat dismantled. State government functioning within the confines of the Indian Constitution. Grassroot-level elected officials share the democratic power structure. Stone pelting, a decade-old, forgotten and dismantled industry. 2. Or think of the Maoists and Naxals and the galaxy of liberals in Delhi who sprouted wisdom in TV studios and conferences on how to tackle Maoism. All this while, in the real world, the Naxals butchered our security forces, destroyed infrastructure, burnt down schools, and strangulated the future of the tribals. The day we (Modi government) stopped listening to the 'sane and sensible liberals' is the day we succeeded. Naxals have been wiped out. Economic growth and opportunities have returned to those troubled lands. In each case, the troubles and mayhem persisted till the conflict entrepreneurs had their jobs and their debauched lifestyle. The day we stopped funding them is the day India started succeeding. Pakistan is the same story of 'conflict entrepreneurs'. Every such formulation - including the latest one of 'Women of South Asia' - is designed to create just one thing and one thing alone: perpetual jobs and other people-funded lifestyles for the elite mandarins. It would do precisely zero to advance any agenda. History tells us so. Remember the almost monthly Track-II talks during the UPA period, the same period during which @NMenonRao was in active service. The same period when there were monthly terror attacks. The Track-IIs have ended. And so has the ability of Pakistan to strike India at will. So what Ms. @NMenonRao is proposing here is not a sensible way forward to deal with Pakistan. All that she is pleading for is to find a way back into the job market for herself and her ilk. Incidentally, this phenomenon of promoting self-interest at the cost of national interest is a uniquely Third World phenomenon, ingrained in the mindset after centuries of colonisation. It afflicts Pakistan as much as it does India, with one exception. In the elite Pakistani mindset, they have no delusions when it comes to India. They want our total destruction, and they see Indian elites (of the ancien régime) as useful idiots, while Indian elites are happy to partake in the conferences and the junkets. Finally, we should never imagine that the dangers of the thought process of the Congress years have permanently passed. Just look at Ms. Menon's timeline to notice the concerted attempt to mobilise support for her agenda. What is needed is vigilance so that these agendas don't ever make a comeback. As an aside, there is an interesting chronology of the India Initiative launched at Brown University when Ms. Menon was India's Ambassador to the USA, and Ms. Menon joining Brown as a fellow soon after retirement.
Nirupama Menon Rao 🇮🇳@NMenonRao

The women of India and Pakistan need to deploy our ingrained common sense and suggest ways forward in our relationship. We need a women’s caucus. Not to throw accusations against each other but to think calmly and sensibly about the future ahead. For the sake of our children. We need to bring in the counterpoint: without naming it, without sounding defensive, but making it impossible to dismiss. For decades, India–Pakistan engagement has been trapped in a single script: territory, terror, recrimination. We repeat it with ritual precision, but it yields diminishing returns. What if we widened the frame? In West Asia, especially the Gulf, our interests often run in parallel: energy security, diaspora welfare, maritime stability, crisis response. These are not abstractions since they affect millions of lives and the resilience of both economies. Engaging here need not dilute our positions, create false parity, or reopen familiar disputes. It can remain tightly bounded, issue-specific, and without prejudice to core differences. Skeptics will argue that Pakistan cannot compartmentalise, that any engagement risks being instrumentalised, and that peripheral cooperation has never altered core hostility. But the purpose here is not transformation, it is insulation. Not to resolve the conflict by other means, but to prevent it from defining all means. Some may also say Pakistan has found a “role” in the Iran crisis and India should not be seen as seeking one. But this is not about visibility or mediation. Our interests are structural not transitory. If anything, the moment underscores a larger truth: even adversarial states operate beyond their disputes when interests demand it. When the central track is blocked, responsible statecraft does not stand still. It explores parallel ones, carefully, deliberately, and on its own terms. Sometimes, widening the field is not weakness. It is strategy. The women must speak.

English
44
166
432
27.6K