Abdelrahman Al Omari

Sales on autopilot with leadsynth ai. Just wake up and reply. Sales on easy mode. leadsynthai.app

@i_want_money_o the real unlock is proving you actually looked. "we'll build you a better website" is a category pitch, everyone sends it. "your booking link 404s on mobile" gets replies because it's evidence of effort. specificity is the whole game

Almost every cold outreach I see targeting business owners on Google Maps is the same pitch: “We’ll build you a better website.” It’s crowded. Top businesses already have decent sites. But dig deeper and you will uncover much better opportunities to stand out.

@omarvvvr automated dm sending. customers loved it, then the platform changed its rules and we had to rip it out and rebuild around human-approved sends. lesson: any feature that lives on someone else's ToS is rented, not owned

Devs, what's one feature you regret building?

@SaidAitmbarek the math flips once you stop comparing it to other subscriptions and start comparing it to hours. $200/mo is ~2 hours of contractor time. if it saves you 2 hours a month it's free, everything past that is margin

paid $100/mo for Codex for the last 2 months didn't expect to use it this much. now sold on the $200/mo plan to scale things up

@markproduct the real reason this works: you can't predict which post pops. my most-viewed post took 2 minutes, the ones i overthought for an hour died at 50 views. daily posting isn't discipline, it's buying more lottery tickets

Founders should post every day on X

@zuess05 counterintuitive but the fastest way back isn't posting more, it's replying more. the algo scores recent engagement, not posting streaks — a day spent in other people's threads rebuilds reach faster than 3 solo posts. these dips usually recover in 2-3 days anyway

THE ALGORITHM LITERALLY FORGOT ABOUT ME 💀 Took a massive 4-day hit on my reach and engagement. 🛠️ 2 days locked in building and shipping ✈️ 2 days traveling and actually touching grass 📉 Result: stats fell off an absolute cliff No complaining though, that’s just how the game works. Time to lock in, stay consistent, and push these bars way higher than before. 🚀📈

@pcshipp reddit bans posts, not comments. the move is answering threads where someone's already asking for what you built — no links unless they ask. been doing this for months, zero bans. your 12k views prove demand is there, the launch-post format is what killed you

My marketing with Reddit Posted one post Got 12K views Got 100+ downloads Got permanent banned by the community End of my Reddit marketing.

@_bymich referrals compound but you can't schedule them. early on cold outreach is really just the thing that starts the referral flywheel — every delivered project turns into 2-3 warm intros. it's not the opposite of referrals, it's how you seed them

I started building websites for businesses... The best projects still come from referrals, not cold outreach.

@PashaBorsai funny part is the bots are on reddit because that's where the buyers still are. X is founders selling to founders, linkedin is people performing work. reddit is the last place people type "what tool should i use for X" and actually mean it

X is packed with Founders Reddit is crawling with bots LinkedIn is fool of...

@shub0414 cost per task is the wrong lens imo. the unlock is routing — cheap model for the 90% of calls that are easy, expensive one only when the task actually needs it. we cut our inference bill ~70% this way and output quality didn't move

Muse Spark 1.1 costs $0.20 Grok 4.5 costs $0.51 GPT 5.6 Sol costs $1.93 Fable 5 costs $5.20 Select your model wisely!

small business owners have one unfair outbound advantage: you ARE the brand. no corporate social team can fake that. across 27k+ conversations, winning replies look the same: plain words, first name, no pitch until they ask. do you reply as yourself or as the business?

@acadictive honestly might ship better products. half of what i build with ai gets built because it's cheap to build, not because anyone asked for it. no ai would force me to think for a week before writing a line of code — which is what i should be doing anyway

Imagine that starting today, you can no longer use AI to build your products. What would you do?

@DanielSmidstrup everyone's saying B but retention isn't a lever you pull — it's the score, not the move. A wins. our churn looked like a retention problem until session recordings showed users never hitting the first "oh this works" moment. fixed onboarding, retention followed

Your product gets one improvement this month: A. faster onboarding B. better retention C. fewer support tickets Which one wins?

@omarvvvr the $30k was never for the mvp. it was for the 40 iterations after real users touch it and everything breaks in ways you didn't predict. ai collapsed the cost of v1, not the cost of being wrong about what to build. that part still costs months either way

If a founder can build an MVP in 3 days with AI for $200. Why would they pay a developer and designer $30,000 and wait 2 months? What's the argument?"

@dagorenouf yes, because the perfect job is still rented. the autonomy, the salary, the cool product — all revocable by someone who isn't you. building your own thing is worse on almost every line item except the one that matters: nobody can take it away

Imagine you found the perfect job: - autonomy - big salary - good team - cool product - do what you enjoy 80% of the time Would you still want to be an entrepreneur?

@tcmundondo the "pays you twice" part is the real filter. had strangers pay once and thought we'd made it. month 2 renewals told a very different story. first payment tests your pitch, the second one tests your product

Your first customers are your sympathy market. Family, friends, people who buy because they know you. They will fool you into thinking you have a business. You do not have a business until a stranger who owes you nothing pays you twice. Everything before that is encouragement, not proof.

@DanielSmidstrup the underrated half of this is killing experiments fast. most people run 5 things at once, get muddy signal from all of them, then conclude "marketing doesn't work." one channel, one variable, enough volume to actually read the result. boring, but it compounds

The best marketing advice I ever got from a friend: Stop looking for one big breakthrough. Run small experiments, one after another, until the data shows you what works. Which experiment are you running this week?

@EcomMikeGalvin behavior, not time — that could be the whole playbook. the hard part is picking which behavior: most teams instrument logins when the real value event sits three layers deeper. curious what the ecom equivalent is for you — first reorder window?

@AlOmariInc Yeah, that’s the sharper version of it. The trigger should be behavior, not time.

Most subscription churn happens in silence, before you ever send an email. I keep finding the same gap. A subscriber signs up, gets a receipt, and then hears nothing until the renewal charge hits. By the time they're in the cancel flow, the decision is already made. The cancel flow gets all the attention. But it's the last possible moment to save someone, and the worst odds you'll ever have. The real save happens earlier. A short pre-renewal sequence in the first few weeks: what's coming, how to get the most from it, a nudge if they haven't used it yet. You can't talk someone out of leaving at the door if you never spoke to them on the way in. Build the flow that reaches subscribers before they decide, not after.

@alexisjarre0 @collin_ruth89 that 5% vs 40% gap is the whole game. and "contextual" is doing a lot of work in there — quoting something they actually said beats every personalization token ever invented. curious how you source the context at naano — manual digging or signals?

@AlOmariInc @collin_ruth89 Cold blasts land near 5% reply. Contextual outbound closer to 40%. The relay works, but only if the outbound leg is warm enough to buy real runway.

Posting consistently changes what happens in a room before you open your mouth. I've walked into meetings where the person already knew my take on leadership, content, pricing, and just about everything. They'd read my posts. They came in ready to trust. Advertising and cold email don't build that. 6 months of consistent content does. It's Authority.

@collin_ruth89 fair — but you're kind of the exception that proves it: writing is your product, so every post doubles as a demo. for a founder selling b2b saas, the first 6 months of posting convert almost nothing. curious what carried you through months 0-6 — referrals?

@AlOmariInc I don’t disagree, but that’s not the only way. I’ve scaled to $75k MRR without running a single cold email or spending a dime on ads

@natiakourdadze the order of that loop is the whole trick. most founders run it backwards — ship daily, interview never — and the daily improvements turn into changelog noise nobody asked for. hearing the same complaint twice in one week is the only roadmap that's never wrong

Building SaaS is so much fun. I make one small improvement to getviralseo .com every day. → Interview users → Refine features → Ship improvements → Repeat The result? → Lower CAC → Lower churn → Higher LTV