AL SMITH
6.3K posts






Reminds me of this all timer tweet.

I'm very sympathetic to the @j_amesmarriott thesis and I've also seen the same issues @b_judah talks about - select committees in the UK (and senate committees in the US) becoming content fodder for social media, very senior politicians apparently unable to focus without getting distracted by their phones. But there are obvious problems with the thesis too. Does anyone really believe that Britain was so exceptionally well-governed 1970s-1990s? Wilson & Macmillan were both very well-read - did that make them brilliantly effective leaders? Also, the peak of mass deep literacy probably isn't 70s-90s but pre-TV & post-universal schooling- so maybe 1890s - 1930s. There were two massive world wars then and public opinion did play a part in them. How does that fit the thesis? Plus do you know who else was a great reader? Hitler! He read a book a day and was apparently always quoting Shakespeare. Stalin loved literature and had a personal library of thousands of books. I don't want to completely dismiss the thesis because there is something going on here but it is not as straightforward as it first seems.

is this a good time to announce our engagement??





