Alan👻🦄
2.8K posts

Alan👻🦄
@Alan_ETHODL
DeFi researcher | Crypto since 2017 | $ETH $AAVE $UNI $LINK $PENDLE | DeFi will win


沒人覺得很離譜嗎...... 法院把我們的錢判給局外人了,感覺討論的人也很少。之前本來 Arbitrum 凍結了 3 萬多顆 $ETH ,大家皆大歡喜被盜的錢能回來 Arbitrum Dao 的提案投票,目前已經 99% 同意了 8 號投票截止就可以開始執行 內容是把凍結的 ETH 轉到多簽錢包,由 Aave / KelpDAO / EtherFi / Certora 四方簽,用來補被偷的 rsETH 缺口 結果!直接被美國人截胡了。美國法院發了裁決書,要 Arbitrum 把凍結資金賠償給局外人,10 年前受到朝鮮迫害的美國人 他們說:這筆錢是北韓駭客的贓款,相當於北韓政府資產。他們在 2015 年對北韓的 3 億美金判決沒收到,這筆錢應應該要用《反恐怖主義法》優先抵償,而不是還給加密大冤種 然後美國法院批准啟動 TRO 14 天緊急凍結。聽證會結束後可能會再頒長期禁制令到完整審判結束(大概幾年吧) 所以 8 號到了 Arb 也不能做什麼,因為如果去還用戶錢相當於核心成員犯法了是能判刑的。@arbitrum 也必須要配合法院執行轉帳...... 原告律師選擇的角度超有殺傷力(ATA 反恐法 + 國家行為駭客 + DAO 凍結資產)三重組合下,DAO 的自治二字找不到法律盾牌 Hmmm 很難評,幣圈是不能上桌吃飯的下等人 😑

I know a lot of people are going to dive into the weeds on every last detail of this. As they should. So, I’m just going to remind everyone that these sorts of things are really fucking difficult. The “real” world doesnt do a great job of handling them either. In fact, the real world often does a horrifically shitty, extractive, slow job. Even for relatively straightforward cases, it can take years for victims to recover any funds. Once there are multiple entities and impacted individuals involved, you can easily be looking at a decade+. During that decade, multiple teams of lawyer and accountants will charge top dollar to untangle the mess. They have little at stake in the outcome. Their job is just to untangle. So they do. This path isn’t required. It’s chosen by the involved parties bc it’s risky to do things. But there is always risk. It’s risky to NOT do things, too. As someone who’s worked with victims going thru civil and criminal forfeiture. As well as being involved in a number of more informal situations. And watching Gox…QuadrigaCX…FTX… It is very rare to get a great outcome from a shitty situation. In the end, most folks are just happy to be done and be able to move on. Even if that means accepting a 12% recovery. I encourage everyone to keep this the back of their minds when discussing. It’s easy to shit on any proposal by comparing it to some perfect fantasy you dream up. But that is a fantasy. It’s an impossible state. It can never happen. You should still push towards this ideal outcome. It’s how you are able to get the best outcome in the end. But never forget that, at any given point, the most likely outcome is far worse than the one you are railing against and calling shit. 💖


GHO borrow cap increased to 150M on Core.




最全面的 Codex 教程,官方看了都说好 不到两小时教会你如何使用 Codex App + gpt5.5 这个最强组合——从 skill 和插件使用、自动化工作流构建到多线程实战演示 如果你想找到 Vibe Coding 的最佳实践,这绝对是目前最值得看的教程之一

As part of an industry-wide recovery initiative, LayerZero's proposed contribution would go towards the best path forward to restoring rsETH backing. We have been closely coordinating with Aave and all other parties like EtherFi, Ethena, Arbitrum, and Kelp who have been working tirelessly to ensure the best possible outcome for crypto.



New from the USD1 Airdrop Campaign! 🔸 Base APR: 6.14% 🔸 Boosted APR: 7.37% Earn up to 7.37% APR (variable) on rewards, with no individual reward cap. Find out more 👉 binance.com/en/support/ann…

我再次回到 GPT 的怀抱, 成为尊贵的 ChatGPT Pro 用户!

Spent the last week calling the largest institutions to get their read on the DeFi situation. Key takeaways: 1- Institutional interest isn't going away, for a simple reason: distributors aren't going away. Massive AUM, payments, and loans are coming onchain. Every fintech wants to move fully onchain. As an institution, you don't have a choice. 2- That said, they've completely lost trust in pool/hub models. Institutions and distributors want control: over the code, over the risk, over the compliance. With the flexibility to isolate what they want, while plugging into the global network of liquidity that's compatible with them. The promise of an open financial system is too big to fail: not because of ideology, but because it's going to create an immense amount of value for everybody involved.



