Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alex Rev
65 posts
Alex Rev
@AlexRevenue
Revenue Systems Engineer 🛠 | Builder × Creator × Trader | 0-1 Product & Self-Media IP Breakdowns | Automated Revenue Flywheels & Passive Income Playbooks
Katılım Temmuz 2025
766 Takip Edilen314 Takipçiler
𝕏 just launched a brand-new Video Editor & Recorder for iOS
New features include:
• Overlay captions in multiple languages with customizable styles
• Green Screen mode using posts or photos from your camera roll as backgrounds
• Built-in recording and editing directly inside the app
Nikita Bier just said that many more video editing features are coming in the weeks ahead
𝕏 is continuing to ship creator tools, making it easier to create and publish original content without leaving the app
English
@JamesAI 推出的全自动GTM系统令人期待。该方案将业务分析、落地页部署、冷邮件、社媒发帖、广告投放及Stripe收款等环节全部打通，实现真正的一站式自动化营收流程。此项目显著降低了出海创业的执行门槛。已申请内测，期待内测反馈与进一步交流。感谢分享！
在悉尼和稀泥@JamesAI
这个系统已经差不多可以上线了。全自动做： 1. 业务分析（包括产品策略和竞品调研） 2. 落地页上线 3. 冷邮件触达 4. 社媒发帖 5. 广告投放 6. Stripe 收款 每个节点的质量现在当然是不如独立开发手搓，但是胜在是一套全流程全自动方案。 有兴趣内测的，麻烦转发+回复，我会私信拉内测群，感谢大家内测反馈。
中文
这个系统已经差不多可以上线了。全自动做：
1. 业务分析（包括产品策略和竞品调研）
2. 落地页上线
3. 冷邮件触达
4. 社媒发帖
5. 广告投放
6. Stripe 收款
每个节点的质量现在当然是不如独立开发手搓，但是胜在是一套全流程全自动方案。
有兴趣内测的，麻烦转发+回复，我会私信拉内测群，感谢大家内测反馈。
在悉尼和稀泥@JamesAI
我看到即使是这样，还是收藏的人多 😅 那就躺的更彻底一些吧，做了一个系统，可以自动的去执行GTM 动作，包括内容生成，冷邮件，社媒，广告投放，落地页搭建，基础 SEO 等。 每天还会有晨报（告诉你今天的 todo）和晚报（告诉你今天的数据总结）。 和 AI 聊完后，直接上站，直接获客，势必要躺着赚到第一块钱。
中文
刚发现 cloudflare workers AI 新上线了一大批模型，包括 Nano Banana 2，Opus 4.7 等流行的模型都有了，我感觉我不需要再去调 open router 了
中文
@bunalimdayimki Jarvis
Bu isim, sohbetlerimizdeki yardımcı, esprili ve doğrudan üslubunuza en yakın karakter olarak öne çıkıyor.
Türkçe
@chenyuq56901969 Exactly. Once a customer is willing to spend internal political capital to keep using it, you're no longer just selling a tool. You're starting to become part of the system.
English
@AlexRevenue When a customer fights internal bureaucracy just to keep using your product, that's not friction.
English
Most founders think moat is what you build before customers arrive.
Wrong.
In real businesses, the moat forms after.
Customers create security reviews, ugly edge cases, mandatory training, internal champions, and failure detection.
If buyers still force your product through that gauntlet, friction is not the problem.
It is proof.
The moat is not the demo.
It is the customer pressure your system survives.
That is when a tool hardens into infrastructure.
English
The real game is not holding onto one model forever.
It’s building something transferable, repeatable, and valuable enough to exit well — then using that experience to build the next flywheel at a higher level.
A sale proves the system.
What you build after proves the founder.
That’s the real moat.
麦克斯@jch47643085
我曾做过一个社会实验，来问身边的朋友 “如果给你 500 万，但代价是终生不能碰现在的工作” 实验范围大多是大学同学，大概问了 30 个人。得到的答案清一色是：“哪里有这种好事？” 由于范围太小，且没有代表性，我决定把这个实验放在 Twitter 上试一试，想看看推友们的回答是怎样。 这个问题有趣在于，它不只是问你的工作能不能被买断。更深层的问题是，你在为了什么让渡时间？ 去年刚毕业，算着手里的钱，产生了一个很流行的想法，叫“赚够多少就躺平”。这个想法马上被我否定了。因为躺平如果只是躺得够平，吃喝拉撒睡的话，那又有什么意思。 因为当我追问“躺平了又去干什么”的时候，答案也是出奇的一致：去旅游、去玩，去吃点好的喝点好的，再去泡几个 18 岁。如果只把网络上那些富人消费场景，当成不再需要让渡时间后的生活方式，这很无聊。 所以我把这条放在我的“不为清单”之首：当我现在所做的事情，需要考虑能否用钱来买断时，则不做。换句话说，工作不是为了赚钱。 无论是打工还是创业，如果目的是赚钱赎身，然后投入消费主义，那永远没有尽头，也注定不会幸福。这个结论我是没跟朋友讲的，因为会被骂傻逼，所以试图在 Twitter 上找找共鸣。
English
Your happiest users aren't product-market fit.
They're just a signal.
Real PMF hits when demand keeps widening,
new users keep sticking,
and the economics still hold at scale.
If only your core cohort loves you,
you've found a corner,
not a business.
PMF is demand that keeps widening
with retention that stays strong and profitable.
If scaling breaks the unit economics,
you never had real market pull.
English
Most founders treat pricing like a conversion problem.
It is a customer-structure problem.
Price changes who enters, what they expect, and how much drag they create after the sale.
Cheap prices do not just cut margin.
They often import buyers who ask for the most and value it the least.
Charging more is not only about revenue.
It is customer selection.
And customer selection shapes the business.
English
Alex Rev retweetledi
AI is turning designs into code at unprecedented speed.
Excellent insights from Evan Spiegel, founder of Snap:
1. The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
2. The whole world of design is changing rapidly because designers are empowered by AI and can ship and test immediately.
3. If you were to sit in on a Snap design meeting you’d hear us go through a huge volume of work. 100s of ideas in a few hours.
4. The most toxic thing you can have is people attached to an idea.
5. If you create a culture where there’s an endless flow of ideas you’re much more likely to get lucky and find a great one.
6. Less than 1% of the ideas we discuss are ever seen by a user.
7. Ideas are free. There should be a zillion of them.
8. Design to code is happening way faster than ever before. [And this trend will only accelerate]
David Senra@davidsenra
My conversation with @evanspiegel, co-founder & CEO of @Snap. 0:00 Edwin Land Influence 2:01 Art Science Upbringing 3:27 Computers And Connection 5:50 Smartphone Addiction Lens 9:30 Building For Humanity 13:15 From Internships To Snapchat 17:02 Snapchat vs. Social Media 18:38 Stories And Vertical Video 22:22 Uncompromising Kind Culture 28:34 Snap Leadership And Design 37:38 AI Supercharges Snap 41:57 No Moat In Software 42:31 Beating the Clone 43:50 Messaging Network Effects 44:58 Camera Out of Pocket 45:49 Specs Market Reality 48:28 AR Platform Explosion 52:14 Vision-Led Product Design 54:09 Why Not Luxottica 59:11 Owning the Stack 1:03:02 Snap the Middle Child 1:08:04 Crisis Without Burnout 1:10:02 Snapchat Plus Growth 1:12:54 Rebuilding the Ad Engine 1:19:03 Subscriptions Over Ads 1:21:14 Fighting Giants With AI 1:22:04 Why Hardware Stands Alone 1:25:29 Snap Lab Origins 1:25:59 New Apps Beyond Snapchat 1:28:29 Focus And Founder Drive 1:32:14 Surfacing Problems Fast 1:36:08 Flat Culture Meritocracy 1:39:36 Last Company And Giving Back 1:41:15 Turning Down Billions 1:48:51 Snapchat Funds New Computing 1:51:24 Crucible Year And Schedule 1:53:56 Stress Reframed Meditation 1:56:09 Explainer In Chief 1:57:07 Closing Includes paid partnerships.
English
@howie_serious 这个标准很准。真正难的不是第一次让人付费，而是已经订了2-3个20刀会员后，还愿意再单独给你一个位置。能过这一关的，基本就不是套壳了。
中文
一个预测：2026 年，是 ai 应用爆发的一年。
不是那种“接个 llm api” 的 ai 应用，而是“有机”的、系统级别的、为用户创造巨大价值的 ai 应用。
一个衡量标准：用户愿意单独付 20 美金一个月，在 已经订阅 2-3 个 20 美金 ai 会员的情况下。
排除情况：如果用户没有购买几个 ai 会员，只买了某 ai 应用，那种不算。大概率套壳。面向的用户也不是真 ai 用户。
---
先抛砖引玉：我在 ai 会员之外，只为 notion 付费了，22 美金/月。另外就是 readwise，但很便宜，50 美金一年。
figma 开了一个月后取消，因为时间有限，需求太少，更愿意按量付费。
大家可以在评论区分享一下：你在 ai 会员外单独付了哪些 20 美金的 ai 应用？
中文