Alice

#Sinner #Jannik #JannikSinner #Wada A question that @wada_ama needs to answer. Sinner tested positive without personally taking any prohibited substances. Naldi, his physio, used Trofodermin spray (source of contamination) not him. No athlete who tested positive without personally taking a prohibited substance -like Sinner- has ever been banned by the anti-doping authorities or the CAS. Bortolotti, Paoletti, Palomino, Silva Santos: all positive for clostebol, all cleared. Why was Sinner treated differently?

@CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 Two positive tests (closely related) with an insignificant amount of an obsolete substance that nobody uses anymore mean nothing and are clearly an accident. In my opinion, without intent or performance enhancing, there should be no case. agreed?

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Nope, I never said Sinner ain't honest. If you look at my profile I have even said I believe in the verdict. But nothing more than that. I won't pretend I know him and say he is innocent and honest. The fact that he has 2 positive tests when the rest don't is enough for me to say

Jannik Sinner a player who the ATP have awarded the most popular fans player of the year for 3 consecutive years, walks out to a half empty stadium.

So you don't know anyone, you can't tell who is honest and who is not but you are sure that Sinner is not?😉 This is precisely why your points doesn't stand: bias. in a polluted world where chemicals are present everywhere, in the air, in the water, in the food we eat, anyone can have substances in their body that we can't even imagine. athletes who are under close scrutiny too, and that certainly doesn't make them dishonest. You have probably way more weird substances in your system than any player. you just don't know it.

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Also, my point stands, and will always stand. I personally don't know anyone so I cant tell who is honest and who is not. Either all players dope, or they don't. But most of them dont have 2 postive tests in their resumes. I respect them for that more than I hate Sinner for it

@CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 I never told you so, lol. the case interests me as he is not at fault and chemistry proves my point, as simple as that. On the other hand: can you tell me why you, as a professional hater, are so invested in this case? this promises to be much more intriguing!

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Also, an italian telling me she likes chemistry being the only reason she being so invested in this case proves my point.

Cases are kept secret until investigations are over, in order not to influence them and ensure an unbiased judgment (way more important than gossip.) The scientists who were involved in the case didn't know that the player was Jannik Sinner and this proves that there was no favoritism towards him. it wouldn't have been possible if his name had been made public since the start.

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 The fact that the case was hidden for months before being made public tells you what they think of us as fans. They don't give a fuck thanks to people like you who they know would worship their idols no matter what

@CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 Yes you are, when you ignore official documents, evidence, facts to prefer unproven fantasies. This is exactly how bad faith works.

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 I am not in bad faith. As a matter of fact, I think there are a lot more in Tennis other than Sinner. Players don't try to earn a honest day's work like us. If there are loopholes, which there are thanks to the administrations and governing bodies, they'll exploit it.

@m_blessedhands @vale_concordia @_ThousandN Per ora ma mai dire mai, la ruota gira.😉 Comunque questa rivalità a me pare molto costruita. certo, la sfida tra i due è stimolante ma, in fondo, ognuno fa il suo percorso. ed è giusto così.

@Alice72533332 @vale_concordia @_ThousandN Ho scritto negli ultimi due anni (da quando é nata la rivalità tra loro). E tranquilla , anche per Carlos conta solo vincere in generale, e anche in quello lo fa più di Sinner 😉

Pazzesco che Sinner abbia praticamente vinto 7 master 1000 e non abbia mai dovuto battere Alcaraz. Gli ultimi tre anni di tennis spiegati in una statistica. Quando il gatto non c'è...

@CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 Nonsense, everything proves he didn't dope at all. doping was ruled out by all those who investigated the case, facts count not opinions. At this point, you are clearly in bad faith. I feel sorry for you.

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Keep up the PR work. None of this proves he never doped intentionally, or that he wont dope in the future. One can say that for any player, but at least they don't have 2 positive tests on their resume.

@m_blessedhands @vale_concordia @_ThousandN Veramente sono 10 a 6. e comunque l'importante per Sinner non è vincere con Alcaraz, è vincere e basta. lo sta facendo. 😉

@vale_concordia @_ThousandN Hai del coraggio a scrivere una roba del genere quando negli ultimi 2 anni gli scontri diretti stanno 7 a 2 per Carlos ahahahahaha

I don't see how talking about Sinner's innocence is disrespectful to other athletes and what my nationality has to do with it (yes I'm from Italy). For sure he did nothing wrong and was undeservedly harmed by a so called "anti-doping" agency whose credibility has been undermined by its scandals and is literally close to zero. Before Wada, the Sinner case was investigated in depth (March-August 2024) by an independent international court that fully cleared him under art.10.5: no fault or negligence. The report is available here: itia.tennis/media/yzgd3xoz… and shows a very thorough, almost invasive inquiry that Wada has never questioned. So what reason for did Wada interfere? There can be only one reason: Sinner had to be banned at all costs, no matter if he wasn't at fault as Niggli (Wada director) admitted in dec. 2024. Otherwise, it's inexplicable.

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 By portraying Sinner like that, You're disrespecting athletes who have never had one postive test, let alone two. The guy who affords to pay lawyers in millions is now being portrayed a saint who was wronged and you'd never let that happen, ever. Don't tell me you're from Italy

My profile is opened since 2017, he didn't exist yet.😀 I just talk about topics that interest me, of course I like him. I've been supporting him since I accidentally learned about the clostebol (or better Trofodermin) affair -before that, I barely knew his name. As a chemist, I immediately realized that it couldn't be a doping case given the substance. And I was right! I looked into the story further and what I thought was confirmed, no doping here. But I never, ever, expected that an obviously blameless guy would be treated like a criminal, never! This is precisely why I support him. I always side with those who have been wronged. a supporter, yes, but not a blind one.😉

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Its so funny how we can literally save ourselves paragraphs if u just admit much of it has to with you liking Sinner too. Of all the world in chemistry, surely this isn't the most fascinating topic that you would open up a profile on X just to talk about it with strangers?

"My main topic is the Sinner case as it has a lot to do with chemistry". Pretty clear, isn't it. I've already explained why calling him a doper is wrong from a scientifical point of view many times, and extensively on my profile. The technical aspect can't obviously concern sport as this is not my matter. What surprises me is that so many people don't accept the simplest and most banal things, preferring their own opinions even when clearly unfounded. Why? I guess a lot of problems here, but surely not mine.

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 False. Your main topic is Sinner case yes, but not necessarily the technical aspect of it. This thread never started on a technical note, and neither did you. You have issue people calling him a doper, and you counter them and this is pretty much what u do. No big deal

@CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 Ok then. But I've never said that I talk tennis. here my main topic is the Sinner case as it has a lot to do with chemistry, the subject of my expertise. so far I've never been a sport fan. But maybe I can make an exception for tennis. who knows.;)

@Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Freedom of speech? I don't have any issue with what you do here. I am just highlighting that what you said you do (talk Tennis) isn't what you do. Also, I do a lot more than calling dopers dopers, unlike you saying you talk Tennis but don't :)

I don't defend them. I enjoy debunking the nonsense I read here, just like others choose to bash someone they don't even know and spread malicious misinformation. it's called freedom of speech, luckily we aren't all the same. P.S. Are you sure that calling people 'dopers' and 'cheaters' is tennis related? I don't think so.

@Alice72533332 @Yolitatennis @kritisanonfan24 That's the thing. I still have not seen you talk Tennis. And your profile does not talk Tennis either. You look like a paid PR worker. If you really are not one, then i guess celebrities and sports star are laugjing at you for wasting so much time defending them here

@Yolitatennis @CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 What a pity! have a fantastic day.😉👋

@CallMeAshay @Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 I will stop engaging. 🤷🏻‍♀️😛

@Yolitatennis @CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not.😅

@CallMeAshay @Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Maybe it is a bot, then. 😂

@CallMeAshay @Yolitatennis @kritisanonfan24 And what's wrong with that? 😂 Unlike many I only talk about things I know, chemistry is my subject while tennis is not, but I'm enjoying it more and more. it's truly a beautiful sport. So I guess i will stay here for a looong, long time...

@Yolitatennis @Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 Her engagement on X is nothing but tails of Sinner not being a doper. Hasn't posted Sinner winning a slam after getting his ban but is the first to arrive if someone calls him a doper 😭

@CallMeAshay @Yolitatennis @kritisanonfan24 It is banned for all athletes, not only tennis players. it just doesn't make much sense for tennis players, since they don't need muscles like weightlifters. It's a completely different sport.

@Alice72533332 @Yolitatennis @kritisanonfan24 If its a drug for weight lifters and not tennis players why is it banned for Tennis players?

@Yolitatennis @CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 I believe in science and facts, not coincidences. (I know. people can lie, chemistry just can't.😜)

@Alice72533332 @CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 😂😂😂😂 So you believe in a million coincidences. Be careful. Some people lie. 😜

As a chemist I know medicamens and how they work. I know perfectly well that the Sinner case was never a doping case, as Wada itself admits and it couldn't be otherwise: you can't improve performances or build muscles with a simple healing spray to treat cuts, that's just ridiculous. And I'm sure you understand it deep down.😉

@CallMeAshay @Alice72533332 @kritisanonfan24 I'm just making a list of all the things that she claims to believe. Maybe seeing them all together will make her doubt a little. Maybe. 😃

Some muscle? 😉 Clostebol builds massive muscles. It's a drug for weightlifters, not tennis players: that's why it was used by East German weightlifters (not tennis players) half a century ago. Now look at Jannik, a tennis player as thin as a fashion model. 'nuff said.

@Alice72533332 @CallMeAshay @kritisanonfan24 off the charts… and yet, Ferrara was rehired. 😂 Of course he was: he did his job well. 😂 Another coincidence, of course, is that Sinner started to dad some muscle at that time, his stamina improved at that time, his forehand became faster at that time. All pure coincidences.😂