Matt Allner

Here we go. The evolution from taxes to fees. So they understand we figured out that gas tax is unconstitutional because we only gave government the power to regulate commerce. So if they don’t tax us, but charge us a fee, they think they are upholding the law. Nice try. It’s still an excise or privilege tax and it’s unlawful. They just won’t stop trying to steal our stuff will they? foxbusiness.com/economy/auto-i…

You swore to protect my rights and the constitutions. In the text of the trust indenture (the contract and agreement we made with you) you agreed you would understand what is written in them. Written in them are the limitations of government which also include the specific duties. If you know the role of each branch of government then you know who is supposed to be following the law and how so. We sent two notices to you along with a long list of others so that you were aware of what was going on and who specifically was infringing on our rights. We sent the notices to you certified with signed receipts by someone authorized to receive your mail. You also acknowledged receipt of the notices. You offered no help. Showed no interest in helping us fix the problem. Showed no interest in asking what you could do to help. You only continued to blame others, yet you saw the recipient list of who all we sent the notice to. You had every name as well as their mailing address. You could have contacted those who were causing harm in an effort to better understand why they were continuing to do so. You could have contacted those who I made aware that are responsible with investigating, arresting, and prosecuting those who are breaking the law. You could have taken our notice (our petition to our government for redress of grievance, which is our constitutional right) and you could have brought it to the house floor with genuine interest and intent of supporting us and it would have been put on the public record for all to see and hear. It would have put more pressure on a school district that was already moving to stop the infringement because the spotlight would have been on them even more. This would have also showed not only your faithfulness as a servant of the people but it would have let you have us alongside of you as your shield of protection in the event you were attacked. Again you didn’t ask what you could do to help and you showed no interest. You’ve been rude and bossy, and you’ve continued to argue with all of us in this thread refusing to answer simple questions we have asked you to. You are a representative of the people but you are not above them. You are below because you do not hold ALL political power as we do. You are therefore a servant of the people. And when we ask you to help us we expect you to. We hold the right to alter, reform or abolish our government at will because government was originally instituted by us, upon our will only, yet you continue to do your will. And this is the exact moment where the constitutions can be seen as biblical and Christian in that Jesus chose to do the will of his Father who was his creator. He understood he was a servant and he instituted it during the Last Supper in the moment with Peter while washing his feet. We respect, we serve, and we do the will of our creator. And the Founders articulated this well within the construct of the constitutions you swore to uphold. These are the rules of the game Ken. They bind you to do our will and not your own and the Trump v United States (2024) case explained it clearly that unofficial acts have no immunity. As our servant we are making sure right here and now you understand what this means and what the implications are with decisions you make moving forward. This is what I brought to Scott in person when we met. I showed him how we were going to bind all these evil people around you at the Capitol so we could clean up the mess and get out state back. He understood it, he supported it, and then he rejected it. And now he is running for governor. There is still time Ken. We have left the door open for you and even Scott and Brandi if they are still willing to help us. We have achieved amazing results thus far but sadly without your help. Imagine what results we could have for our children and how quickly we could have them if at least some of our servants were faithful and helped us fix it?

@AllnerMatt @mommadj75 @ClintKieler @LisaintheMtns @gdaughtermorris @rtflack7777 I have no idea how to action your request. I am not in the executive branch, or judicial. My lane and responsibilities are unfortunately limited.

Stepped off the floor to break this down: SB26-018 isn’t just name changes; it opens the door to unpublished records, identity laundering, and bypassing parental rights. We debated a religious exemption tied to real concerns like camp sleeping & bathing arrangements. Remember: last year’s law nearly forced co-ed facilities until public outrage stopped it. This is happening piece by piece. Parents—stay engaged.

So when a servant like you and Rep Bottoms take the same oath as they do, and then when we who believe you both to be faithful servants who will be OUR voice, we send you not one but two lawful notices of how our children are being harmed and propagated in our schools and we ask you to help us fix the problem and then you personally refuse to help. And Scott was a whole other level of dishonorable. I patiently showed him the law for months and he saw it for what it was. After months of meeting with him he finally asked what he could do to help and I asked him if he could call our Sheriff and my school district to inquire on what was going on and how it was being handled. It was a simple request and he said he would do it. He promised he would help and he did nothing. Even after I reached out to him about it. And he did the same thing with the special session in the summer. We handed him a document that would have put the entire legislature and the governor and AG on Notice on the House floor. He said he would read it on the floor and he never did. He is a pastor and he deliberately lies Ken, and you have nothing to say about it so what does that say about you? We have all showed you the law. We have explained in these posts what your duty is and showed it to you in the constitutions. And you won’t even acknowledge it. How are you any better than those politicians you say are not honoring their oath when you refuse to properly honor yours? What is so sad here is by coming to you both with the notices we were trying to clear your names as the notices serve not only to bind and punish our direct oppressors but also to clear the names of those we come to for help who actually make an effort and try. Leah Cushman is a former House Rep in NH. I put Scott in touch with Leah and she explained things very well to him in an email Scott sent me on accident. What she shared with him was damning. It was a warning from one representative to another. I strongly recommend you ask Scott for a copy of the email and pay close attention to what she said because these notices are a credible form of evidence that can be used against any representative who proves to be an unfaithful servant. And to date none of you made an effort to help me. So how have you been a “faithful servant” in my request to get help and remedy for my redress of grievance?

Yes, those seats. Granted to them by the voters Those in those seats take the oath, but do not abide by it. The voters need to vote them out and vote in those who do value the constitution It does little good to posit how things should be other than to serve as motivation to deal with them.

@tom__builder @AnthonyLButler2 @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok And why didn’t he do it right the first time?

@AllnerMatt @AnthonyLButler2 @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok Who knows what he’ll do? 🤷 Barrett can reissue 9 years, he just needs to fix the legal error and justify it properly this time.

@AllnerMatt @AnthonyLButler2 @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok “We the people” includes juries too. They heard the evidence. They convicted. Appeals reviewed it. Same result.

@tom__builder @AnthonyLButler2 @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok Resentenced more or less?

@AllnerMatt @AnthonyLButler2 @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok That she needs to be resentenced for her felonies.

Can “We the people” be “Me the People”? “We” are the collection of the People. Not just one. So, I’m curious. Is your mentality to allow the governor to abuse his granted authority given the current situation with Tina Peters that required a 77 page explanation from the court that her entire sentencing was wrong? Being granted power does not mean you can do whatever you want. You must do what is lawful. The courts were supposed to have gotten that right the first time and they didn’t. They’re supposed to know the law to. This is the problem. Most of our elected officials, including most of the judges are not following the law properly. And when we have citizens that don’t even understand The most basic right stated in simple English in the first section of the Bill of Rights and in every state Constitution, that they have “ALL political power”, their lays the start of the problem. Wouldn’t you agree?

@AllnerMatt @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok Article IV section 7 of the Colorado constitution.

Would you look at that… While a gold star mom with cancer rots in prison for exposing MASSIVE election fraud…. It’s @laurenboebert chumming it up with the very scumbag who’s keeping Tina Peters in prison. That scumbag is none other than DEMOCRAT Governor Jared Polis.

@AnthonyLButler2 @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok Is the power given to the governor or granted to him? And who wrote that into the constitution?

Be careful using AI for this sort of information. All AI is designed to get you to trust it. But it has installed matrix to know when you are trusting things that it’s telling you that aren’t true. In matters of constitutionality, because freedoms are on the line, it’s designed to confuse and deceive you. I’ve been sparring with ChatGPT as well and it constantly tries to tell me things I can prove aren’t true. By the time the debate is over it will have agreed with everything that I’ve challenged it on.

@ThatGuyMarkRyan @AllnerMatt @seanmpond Grok says, state agency. This opens the door. It's unconstitutional, without question. Our Colorado government belongs to a Republic. It is not its own country, although king Polis and Marxist subjects like to play pretend. This law requires that attorneys reject federal law.

This is the part that breaks my heart about Colorado. Most people do not even see it happening. The federal government has limits. It can only do what the Constitution allows. The State of Colorado is different. It can do anything unless the Constitution clearly says no. Anything. That means the power over your land, your water, your job, your way of life is not really in Washington. It is in Denver. And if the people in charge do not live like you, do not think like you, and do not respect your way of life, they still have the power to control it. That is exactly what is happening. Then we made it easier. Ballot measures sound like power to the people. But big money figured out a long time ago how to use that system. They do not have to live here. They do not have to understand this state. They do not care about rural Colorado. They just bring money. They flood the airwaves. They shape the message. They pass the law. And now it is forced on you. That is the system we are living under. And here is the hard truth. Washington is not coming to fix it. They cannot. This power sits at the state level. So while everyone is distracted by national politics, Colorado is being changed from the inside out, piece by piece, law by law. Until one day you wake up and realize the place you grew up in does not feel like yours anymore. That is where we are. And I am not okay with it. I am not going to lie to you and pretend a U.S. Senator can wave a hand and fix Colorado. They cannot. But they can do something just as important. They can stand on a stage big enough that people actually hear the truth. They can call it out. They can fight federal overreach so it does not make things worse. And they can wake people up to what is really happening at the state level. That is why I stepped into this. Because I watched it happening in real time. I watched decisions get made that hurt people I know. I watched voices get ignored. I watched outside influence take over a state I love. And I realized something. If you do not have a platform, people do not hear you. So I stepped onto one. Not for a title. Not for politics. Because someone has to say this out loud before it is too late.

@AnthonyLButler2 @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok And where did he get that power from?

@AllnerMatt @laurenboebert @JustJenRX @ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 @grok does the governor of Colorado have pardon power?

@ClintKieler @gdaughtermorris @mommadj75 @rtflack7777 Congresswoman Boebert, just had to chime in to correct you on something quick. When you say the governor is “the one man who has the authority” that is not accurate. In other words, if the governor does have that authority, it needs to be expressly written somewhere in the constitution (that he swore to protect) as this is where the people specifically wrote where their government would be limited in the granted authority they were given. Can you show us where it is written that he is the one that has that authority to release her? And if you can show us, can you then tell us where he got that authority? Because if my memory serves me correctly, I believe the people created government therefore they are the superior source of political power which gives them all authority over all elected officials, including him and you. And I believe we reserved the right in our constitutions to alter, reform, or abolish our government at will didn’t we? Perhaps we should just send a simple And lawful notice of instruction to the governor (along with copying you) to release her now? Since we wrote it in the constitutions that we have the right to instruct our representatives, I don’t believe we expressly wrote into the constitutions that any of you can ignore us. So this should work correct? And it would save you time so that you don’t have to buddy up to the governor to work some sort of deal for her release. I mean, if we sent you both a lawful notice and you ignored it, we would have evidence that you ignored us, and if by right, we hold ALL political power, and you refused to submit to the greater authority (the People) wouldn’t that be an “unofficial act” because you would be choosing to act the way you wanted, as opposed to doing what we instructed you lawfully to do, which is acting in the private? (See Trump v United States, 2024). Are you both truly accountable, and therefore amenable, to the People?

@JustJenRX OR !! Maybe I’m the only member of our delegation who actually speaks with the one man who has the authority to release her. Stopping by to say “hello” while we’re at the same event directly supports my advocacy for Tina. It’s OK to not assume the worst at all times.

Who are the people who are evil? Democrats? Republicans? Neither? Both? Are any politicians even following the constitutions? Even the ones we think that are good? If the people send a lawful notice to their servants (elected officials) asking them to help them, can they just ignore the people? In an express trust, one can only do with a specifically written into the permissions for them to do. And we didn’t write anything in there telling them they can ignore us. And what if you “instruct” them specifically and lawfully on how to help you and they still ignore it? What then? Have they broken their promise they made in their oath to uphold the constitutions? The very documents which were the trust indenture — the agreement between the People and their servants. . . Not a good thing for elected officials to ignore the people when they come with questions or to instruct.

Colorado is becoming the SOVIET UNION, TOO

@magstricks @seanmpond Was it published in the Colorado revised statutes? Or was it signed by the governor, sealed by the Secretary of State, and published into the session laws for 2025? Big difference.

@AllnerMatt @seanmpond SB 25-276 was put through last year.

Great question. Who’s responsible for issuing the consequence? If you think a judge is responsible, you need to bring something forward to the courts, which means you need evidence. How would you collect that evidence in advance and another question is is how could you avoid the courts And having to pay enormous amounts of money for attorneys that in any case 50% of the time one of them will lose? This is where the concept of what we are doing is very effective. We don’t fight things in court right now and we certainly don’t involve any attorneys unless they want to come alongside of us and learn and help us with the same methods we are using. But you need evidence With evidence you can bring that to law-enforcement, who then can request from a judge a warrant for an arrest. But to do this, you need good evidence because no judge will sign that warrant without a worn affidavit from someone that swears under the penalty of perjury that what they are saying is true. So what we do is we study and learn the law of the constitutions incredibly precisely well. We strategically use it to send a perfectly written legal understanding of the constitution and how our elected officials are harming us or how things could be because certain counter measures need to be put in place to prevent it. So we show them the law, explain our grievance, and give them a chance to rebut our claims item by item. We also write into the notice that if they ignore the notice and don’t respond by way of lawful affidavit, they agree everything in our notice to be true. Elected officials are already bound by oath to obey, and then when we send notice and they ignore it, they give us evidence against them to bring into the courts. Bottom line is, if anyone really understood the constitutions they would be terrified to run for office and step into that position knowing they better know well themselves with the law is because any attorney or anyone that was to advise them incorrectly could see them facing treason, which is punishable by death or imprisonment. And that’s right out of our constitution Not too long ago, an attorney was sparring with Chief Justice Roberts during a case. The lawyer was disagreeing with his position on a case and said to him “ this is a new world”, to which justice Roberts replied “ it may be a New World, but it’s the same old constitution”. Again, the deception of words has been the game plan against us. The constitution, even with all of its amendments, has not been changed. The same protections are there as they were in 1776 when the country was founded. Some amendments have been made to the constitution but those are even unconstitutional. They just haven’t been challenged. An example of that is our gun rights here in Colorado. You have to read our state constitution though. These are not 2A rights. Those rights are from the US Constitution for those living in the jurisdiction of Washington DC. Argon rights come from our state constitutions. All 50 of them. And what they did to ours as they modified some wording with conceal carry rights. And these as they are written are unconstitutional. So my point in all of this is that we have to just be wise about what we believe the minute we hear things. We need to stop and think and not get too worked up right away. And we have to remember the fundamentals of lol because it just Roberts says none of it has changed. Stay free out there everyone

@AllnerMatt @seanmpond Well, it would seem that almost no one in the CO legislature knows what TF they're doing. Where are their consequences?

Interestingly, many of the bills they are signing are actually not unlawful, but the manner by which they are writing those bills are. It’s very long to explain, but it has to do with the original authority the People wrote into the constitution, as the authority we granted was very limited. None of the three branches had any authority to write rules that gave them more power. And we definitely did not give them permission to write any changes such as rules, regulations, or the creation of agencies or departments to serve the executive branch (ie. The Department of revenue, the DMV, etc.). They’ve been very deceptive and very tricky with their words, teaching us for over 100 years to believe certain words mean certain things when they don’t. When people have a learned behavior that has been conditioned over generations, they don’t even think about questioning things because they don’t even know how. Yet deep down they know what is happening to them is wrong. This is where we all are right now. If we knew the truth that there isn’t a single tax we are paying right now that is lawful except for indirect taxes on products we purchase (but those taxes are already built into the price that we see on the shelf that we may agree to put them in our cart and purchase them), we would be outraged. We already are outraged, but we just don’t quite know how to articulate the argument, who to bring it to, and then what to do as far as enforcement if those who should be fixing the problem refuse to fix it or pretend they can’t. The people hold all political power in every state throughout the United States. But you think they would’ve taught us this in school and they didn’t. I wonder why? What a large group of us now know as the truth and this is why we are getting elected officials to move, to get out of our way, and to drop all sorts of ridiculous fines, and fees, and infringements on our rights. We started pushing back during Covid And some of us were more successful than others. Some of us didn’t know as much as we know now about our true constitutional authority, but we knew something was wrong and we didn’t wait until we stood up, and that alone was enough to scare the people trying to force us to do things. My fight right now is to protect children because if we don’t focus on that right now, everything else won’t matter in 10 years. School systems I worked in for 20 years have been completely flooded with indoctrination, and they have frustrated the best of the teachers who would push back, leading many of them that have other skill sets to leave the profession. Now we are dealing with a completely submissive system, with no checks and balances from the people. Many are aware, but are afraid, and those that are aware that aren’t afraid just don’t quite know what to do other than to Lawyer up at $750 an hour, which is ridiculous because we can take care of this on our own if we just understand the Fundamental Law. We are just lazy and we want someone else to do it, which is why we fall victim to believing election cycles have hope and a candidate has power to fix things for us. Again, if the people have all political power, what power do our elected officials have? Only that which is granted to them and if we don’t like what they’re doing, we take their power away. It’s that simple and we reserve that right in the constitutions where we wrote into them our right to alter, reform, or abolish the government whenever we feel it is harming us

@AllnerMatt @seanmpond Sponsored by the usual peoples rights strippers. You need to be the one to argue this bill. We have a part time Congress. And many of the bills being signed into law are unconstitutional, however we have a governor who thinks he is a king,his Marxist house and Senate as subjects

@magstricks @ThatGuyMarkRyan @seanmpond Exactly. Lots of pretending. And if we don’t understand our rights, we will voluntarily give them up by way of what is known as tacit acquiescence. This is the same way by which we bind elected Officials with lawful notice

Yes I understand, and so am I. Can you show me the bill the governor signed to make our judicial branch a state agency? And on that note, Where did the governor get the authority to do that? Where does any branch of government get its authority to do anything and are those granted authorities limited? And limited to what? Governor is in the executive branch—he has no influence or jurisdiction over the judicial or legislative. The Legislative branch writes the laws. Executive branch carries out the law (enforces it). Judicial branch interprets it. Limited powers. Once they step outside of this it’s unconstitutional. Just like the state agency you made reference to. Where did we give authority to the governor to create this state agency or any agency for that matter? We didn’t. All this crap we are seeing is a test to see if the people will keep falling for election cycle nonsense as their hope for remedy, or whether people will wake up and learn the fundamental laws of the constitution and start standing in their rights like a boss. No matter what the governor does it has no authority or jurisdiction over the People. Any law or bill the legislative branch passes and the governor signs must be sealed by the Secretary of State and published in the session laws of that specific year. The C.R.S. are not session laws—big difference and a big deal to know. The revised statutes were published under one single enactment at the beginning of the publishing making them void to the People but applicable to “persons” IF found legal and could hold up in court. But they are not for the People. They aren’t valid to be enforced legally upon the people but are rules and laws they passed for “persons” to follow. But just because they aren’t supposed to do it, does t mean they won’t try. And if we individually don’t push back when/if they do, we give up our rights. Persons are lawfully defined as elected officials/reps, corporate entities, etc. I recommend you get a copy of any Blacks Law dictionary (1st - 5th edition) and see the definition of a person and people are not the same. Jurisdiction is the key here. When the founders as “People” wrote the constitutions of each state and the US they gave created the three branches and gave them very limited powers. Those powers became the jurisdiction by which they could execute those powers on our behalf and for our benefit only. And we specifically told them what our power, authority, and specific rights were in the Bill of rights. Another important note here is the root of authority comes from the one who created the other. If we created government then we have all authority over it and there is a maxim of law that states “In the presence of the superior power, the inferior power ceases. The less authority is merged in the greater.” (Maxim 11w). Again if we really understood our power and how they designed the appearance of a change in government around a constitutional framework that is rock solid, in an effort to deceive us, and it has. Important to know all this and to have read it if running for office. Case in point is this most recent Supreme Court victory here in CO (Chiles v Salazar). She not only won, but her rights were infringed and now she can take Salazar back to civil court and sue the living crap out of them and she should. The more we do this the more this crap will stop. Elected officials also better dig into and read and understand the constitutions they will swear under oath to follow, but also the entire case Trump v United States (2024) because in it the court explains “official” versus “unofficial” acts. That case was damning for elected officials who want to play games with the people’s rights or even touch the void in them. If “WE THE PEOPLE” really knew how powerful we were politically, none of us would ever run for any office unless we had a solid team around us that knew the fundamentals of the constitutions including the maxims.

@AllnerMatt @seanmpond He's talking about the Colorado government. Did you know that the Senate passed, Polis signed a bill that made our judicial branch a state agency? So now attorneys must submit to the state that they will abide by sanctuary laws or they can't use the e-file system? And I hear ya

Did you really just say all of this? Really? Have you ever read the Colorado or US Constitutions? The People hold ALL political power over the states and federal governments. There are very strict consequences for not knowing what you are doing when you are in office. Might want to really read the contracts you will be swearing to uphold. The people have all authority over their elected officials because we created government for our own personal benefit. It just got hijacked slowly back in the 1880s