喵星星 🔶

🚨聚币5个月完成完美闭环：1月黑名单→5月跑路 烧重金找一堆KOL狂吹，骗散户疯狂充钱😅 加密圈的低配骗子越来越没创意了，纯纯的资金盘收割机 想跑路就直接说，演这么low干嘛？ sfc.hk/TC/Alert_List #聚币跑路 #加密骗局 #KOL收割 #JU

现在各大交易所基本都要拉黑 #HTX 的地址了😅 而HTX的回应差不多是： 抓捕周树人，跟我鲁迅有什么关系😂

外卖交易员的一天

@VitalikButerin @ethereumfndn @aerugoettinea 课代表总结： $ETH 是大家的，不是 @VitalikButerin 一个人的，V神说自己现在占比很少股份，他的权利也有限，能做的事很有限，以后币价跌了别再骂他一个人了。 其实他还是能发挥更大作用的，但需要背后的财团给他更多股份和更多权利

Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.

“金色财经”上古时代的财经快讯，应该没什么人在用了吧

@sisibinance 那么币安官方真的 Echo 推特用户名现在是哪个

事情比复杂，尽量给大家说清楚 今天下午 16:27,我先发了一张团队的聚合海报,当时 Echo 还没来得及发布自己的内容。 Echo 原来的 ID 是【 @ Echo188**6】是注册时默认生成的,为了和大家统一队列,进行了更改 骗子就钻了这个空子，利用改ID的时间差,抢注了【 @ Echo188**6 】这个旧 ID。 抢注完成之后,他们从聚合海报里截了 Echo 那一部分,用 AI 仿制了一版,并且加上了 CA。 你们仔细看会发现,带 CA 那张海报里,英文大小写、衣服花色、颜色,都跟原图对不上，散布完,立刻把抢注的账号注销，不注销的话,通过这个号的历史记录一眼就能识破。 到目前为止,这件事虽然并没有太多讨论 但我们还是决定主动告诉大家 作为币安华语的一员,我没办法接受让这种不法分子留有任何空间。哪怕主动曝光会引来讨论,用户的安全也永远比我们的体面重要。 说实话,我们都很生气 抢注 ID、AI 改图、社区散布、注销灭口,一整套流程下来确实防不胜防。如果不是一位细心的技术同事发现了图之间的细微差别,一开始我们自己都很难还原全貌。 ⚠️再提醒大家注意： 【@ Echo188**6 】这个被抢注的 ID,从此刻起,无论它在未来任何时间以任何方式重新出现,发布任何内容,都不是 Echo,都不是币安官方,都是钓鱼，看到的请直接当作骗局！不要相信！不要点击！不要交易！ 为了避免阴谋论,我会在1小时后删掉之前那条聚合海报。这1个小时,留给大家看清楚事情全貌。 同时,欢迎大家提供线索到举报邮箱：audit@binance.com 我们会和法务团队及 IA 部门一起,把所有能走的法律追溯路径走完。链上有痕迹,链下也留有证据 我们会追责到底! 团队也会借这次把流程做得更严谨，任何一个缝隙都可能被不法利用！ 今天本来是 Pizza Day,应是一个庆祝的日子。 区块链是去中心化的,它带来便利性的同时, 也同时隐藏着很多风险。 从Web2 到 Web3,信息差永远存在，这也是币安作为中心化交易平台一直被需要的原因，这就是为什么我们要有客服和人工的原因 我们只能比骗子更努力,才能把大家守护好🫂 晚安。 Pizza Day 快乐。

$HYPE 一路新高，最慌的可能不是空军，而是 @binance 留给 @binancezh 的时间和牌，其实都不多了： 拉 $BNB 重新点燃链上预期 推 $ASTER 硬造下一轮新叙事 再扶一个现象级 #meme 把流量抢回来 市场不会永远等你 当情绪、流动性、注意力都开始往外流的时候 —— #Binance 该出手了

@0xMayyy @0xMoon 有没有人跟我一样，把护照看成了结婚证

关于我和 @0xMoon 的五年 💓 “心里有个满分的你 看谁都差点意思 换句话说 我遇见了你 也就不想再遇到任何人了” 虽然是复制粘贴 但也是我心里所想 不久的将来我们将为促进中马关系 做出一份巨大的贡献 ！

观察到 孙老板 一套赚钱玩法： 收老 HB 接收用户“沉淀资产”（约 7 亿U），先按兵不动 再强上规则：月1%管理费，单币种最低 3 U 每月约 700 万U“管理费”稳定进账 时间越久，用户资产被持续稀释 最终用户的沉淀资产“合法蒸发”，收益稳稳落袋 huobi.info/zh-cn/cn/agree… #huobi #htx

权力大于金钱 在政治面前财富没有坐的份

不卑不亢、落落大方的马云

@hotbabyrebao @elonmusk 被马斯克临幸过的女人，这辈子怕是很难在找个普通男人结婚了

Thank you, Mr. Musk, @elonmusk for gifting me 4,000 followers. Your reply to my tweet yesterday fell on my birthday. I’m extremely thankful to you. May everything go smoothly and may you be happy every day. 中文版：马斯克先生，我想给你生孩子～

入乡随俗 @elonmusk

好奇一问 @elonmusk 在中国使用了什么VPN 翻墙

以前项目Rug：只能认栽 现在项目Rug：能查人了 币安这步，本质是在补“作恶成本”。 也得恭喜一下 Hunter，这么多年埋头做基建， @RootDataCrypto 已经成了做项目DD的刚需工具之一。 讲真，这类工具是真的在一点点提升行业透明度。 如果信息颗粒度再饱满一点，基本可以当“链上天眼”用了。

参与过 @worldlibertyfi 预售的注意了 $WLFI 解锁入口已开放👇 worldlibertyfinancial.com/unlock 5分钟搞定，记得先去看解锁时间表 实话说 —— 协议并不友好 ⏳2028年5月才开始解锁 ⏳到2030年5月才解锁完 你可以不爽，但你没得选 能解锁，总比一直锁着强 只希望到时候还能值点钱

📉 7.3 → 6.8，近一年人民币升值约7% 1万美元，价差5000块人民币 持有人民币，就是做多中国，躺赢！🇨🇳

@feifan7686 CB这种远古时代的台子，谁用谁难受

Coinbase宕机6小时， 中文加密圈几乎无人理会。

@letsvpn 中国大陆未恢复正常运营

【快连 VPN 恢复正常运营】 我们将于多伦多时间 5 月 8 日 24 点起，面向全球用户恢复标准运营机制，账户时长将按标准规则计算和扣减。 同时，我们也对账户时长补偿、冻结补偿有效期和退款处理安排做了更新：4 月 8 日至 5 月 8 日期间的购买时长将在冻结时进行补偿； 由于部分用户尚未完成冻结操作，因此冻结补偿有效期延长至北京时间 5 月 12 日 0 点，届时未冻结的用户系统将统一补发补偿时长，已提交的退款申请也会继续处理。 这段时间给大家带来的困扰，我们深感抱歉，也感谢您的理解与耐心。 详情可查看：letsvpn.world/blog/f20bkd

@Foresight_News @CathieDWood @cz_binance 从公开喷BN，到拿到赔付后澄清，木头姐维权也花了好几个月

🧐Cathie Wood 与赵长鹏播客对谈：澄清币安非 10·11 闪崩始作俑者 Cathie Wood @CathieDWood 与赵长鹏 @cz_binance 进行播客对谈，Cathie Wood 澄清了其去年对 1011 加密市场闪崩事件的评论，在「闪崩」事件中，币安实际没有触发闪崩，是暴跌导致故障，叠加关税恐慌情绪造成市场脆弱性被放大。 赵长鹏对此回应，「感谢你的澄清，那段话曾被媒体大量引用，很多人说币安导致了崩盘，很高兴你现在对此澄清了。」 同时，赵长鹏也分享了自己对于比特币的看法，其认为特朗普会在中期选举前，尽一切努力改善股票市场，当股票市场表现良好时，加密货币也会同步受此影响