Vik🃏 retweetledi

In today's standard paper, I ask;
1. Given that a judge holds office by reason of his capacity to reason, can a judge then err in reasoning?
2. I ask whether a judge is permitted to use a particular school of jurisprudence as a fixed and determinative position
3. Does the constitution combine the various schools of legal reasoning (jurisprudence)?
4. Does the constitution have a framework for legal reasoning (a basic structure for reasoning)?
Enjoy reading, and let me know your feedback.

English


































