Amy Cooper

Lobbying in America, especially by foreign interests, should be completely ILLEGAL. How is it acceptable that a sitting president or any elected official can have “donors” at all? Why do they need donors? They are already paid by the American people. They work for us! This system is a breeding ground for corruption. It undermines the interests of citizens and replaces them with pressure to serve domestic and foreign donors instead. This must STOP. This applies equally to presidential elections. The only question should be: Who is best suited for the job in the eyes of the American people, not who has the most money to run a campaign. There is no legitimate reason for campaigns to require money of this magnitude. We have virtual platforms that allow candidates to reach more people than ever before, at minimal cost. Campaigns should not be battles of wealth. Why should someone’s ability to lead depend on how much money they can raise? Candidates should be given equal access to major media platforms. The real purpose of this system is clear: those with financial power use it to push out candidates who don’t serve their interests and to influence election outcomes. That strips Americans of their right to genuine choice. If we are serious about democracy and restoring trust in elections, then dismantling this money-driven system should be the first step, at least in my opinion.

@researcherdaisy @RoseySuspicions @CharlotteLee_88 Hahah came to the comments for this!

@RoseySuspicions @CharlotteLee_88 NOT ME

🕵️ The mystery of “Who actually ran Charlie’s Twitter?” may finally have an answer. Fortunately, Charlie explains the whole thing himself. No séance or AI required. 🙏🤣

Does Erika have a dissociative disorder? It's possible some of her behaviors appear to align with that, and it may still be considered dissociative. However, I think Erika's situation is far more complex than a disorder that developed organically in response to trauma. My view is that Erika was likely groomed from a young age to become an "asset," learning to adapt her identity to fit whatever role was needed to accomplish a goal. Because of that, she may genuinely struggle to know who she is. The contradictions, lies, and inconsistencies don't necessarily point to a dissociative disorder, they may instead reflect someone who has spent so much of their life performing different personas that authenticity is no longer natural. When someone is constantly pretending to be someone else, it's difficult to maintain a consistent narrative. They have to keep adjusting their story to fit new situations, and eventually those inconsistencies become apparent because they aren't responding from a genuine, stable sense of self.

Today on the show: -Judge Graf denies the defense’s request to subpoena Lance Twiggs. The case against Tyler Robinson, will likely be a show trial. -We follow up on what happened to Charlie’s Freedom shirt. -ANOTHER person steps forward confirming our earlier report that Erika dealt with Epstein’s models while living in NYC. youtube.com/live/9CuC1yf8-…

Brian Harpole's hospital story is laughable. The moment a patient enters a hospital, that hospital assumes responsibility for their care. Allowing an unauthorized person to perform medical tasks or direct treatment would create enormous legal liability, violate patient safety protocols, and potentially breach patient privacy laws. The claim that Brian was telling medical staff what medications to administer belongs in the category of "things that didn't happen." As for Charlie's clothing and personal belongings, those items would have been collected, documented, and placed in a belongings bag to be released to Erika or another authorized next of kin. And if Charlie's shirt was cut off; whether by medical personnel or, for the sake of argument, by Brian, it would almost certainly have been preserved as evidence, with hospital staff and/or law enforcement maintaining a documented chain of custody.

A $20 tip is a good tip, regardless of the total bill. I served during a time when tipping wasn't automatically based on a percentage. People tipped based on the experience they had, not because there was an expected 20–25% standard. I believe it's created a level of expectation that didn't exist before. People also seem to forget that tips are exactly that: tips. They're voluntary, not mandatory. Who are we to decide what someone else should give? Maybe a family saved up to enjoy a nice dinner together but didn't have much left over for a large tip. I don't believe someone's ability to leave a certain percentage should determine whether they're "allowed" to go out and enjoy a meal. If you ask me, that mindset has created a more entitled culture around tipping. Did I get frustrated when I didn't receive a tip? Absolutely. But it was part of the job, and the guests who tipped generously often made up for those who couldn't, or chose not to tip. That's just how I always looked at it.

My husband and I went out for dinner last night, and something happened that honestly left me confused. Our bill came to $70, and we left $20 on the table as a tip. In my mind, that felt reasonable. It was not meant to be disrespectful, and we were not trying to make any kind of statement. We simply paid the bill and left what we thought was a fair tip. But the waiter refused to take it and told us that if we were not willing to tip at least $35, then we should not be dining out. I was surprised, because $20 on a $70 bill is still a real amount of money. Maybe it is not what some people expect now, but it also does not feel like nothing. I understand that servers work hard. I know tips matter, and I respect the people who do that job. But I also think moments like this show how tense tipping culture has become. What used to feel like a thank-you now sometimes feels like a demand. Customers feel pressured, servers feel underpaid, and everyone ends up frustrated with each other instead of questioning the system that created the problem. So I am genuinely asking: was $20 on a $70 bill really that bad, or have tipping expectations gotten out of hand..., 🤔🤔🤔?

Lies. Baron didn’t say "Tyler Robinson did it” They both have stated it’s likely he has some part in it. Such as maybe he was told to drive around in certain areas. Baron has speculated based on what he/we know he could have played a small part, and then realized they were going to use him as a patsy.

Baron says Tyler Robinson did it. Candace says Tyler Robinson wasn’t even there. When two of the biggest voices in an investigation can’t agree on something this fundamental, you’re no longer looking at a disagreement. You’re watching a schism.

@FoldARPrez I’ll have to disagree on this one…

This is, both scientifically and Biblically, the most likely scenario... by far. They are just waiting on the power to go out... per Erika's "Black Start" documentary. I will do a full write-up linking this to their ecumenical end-time plans soon. Victor Marx, his bunker compound, his closeness to Erika, and his desire to be governor of Colorado is all part of it. There is a reason we call them the "Deep Church". Woe to those who choose to participate in it. "Come out of her my people, lest you take part in her destruction." vornews.com/news/erika-kir…

@Randokat11 @CarriePrejean1 Yeah because it’s not like multiple people that surrounded Charlie aren’t bad actors…

@AmyCooper83 @CarriePrejean1 What part of multiple sources isn't xomputing? You that slow? Is it the low IQ you have?

Before his death, Charlie Kirk was being publicly smeared as an anti-Semite, attacked, morally blackmailed, and pressured by Zionist thugs. Then Charlie said the words that set the hoodlums into a full blown panic. “This leaves me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.” “I'm thinking of inviting Candace.” “I won’t cancel Tucker.” Imagine what came next if he stayed on that path and doubled down with @RealCandaceO @TuckerCarlson and even left evangelical dispensationalism (pro-Zionism). A Charlie Kirk who could not be controlled. A Charlie Kirk standing alongside Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. A Charlie Kirk continuing to criticize Israel. A Charlie Kirk willing to expose the influence of the Zionist donor network that had long bankrolled the conservative establishment. This text was sent just days before his death. The public is being asked not to notice the timeline. Not to ask questions. Not to connect the dots. Just shut up and go along with everything TPUSA is saying. We deserve answers. For Charlie. For Truth. For the organization he built, alongside friends like Candace, before there were donors. Who was threatened by the direction Charlie was heading? Who stood to lose if he walked away from Israel and Zionism? Why was the pressure campaign against him escalating before he died? The more TPUSA demands silence, the louder these questions become. #ANSWERTHEQUESTIONSTPUSA x.com/NihiloX/status…

@Avabelly__ You must not be from the south…. I’m from GA and no one would give a second thought if a guy was working in the yards shirtless 🤷‍♀️

So apparently I’m the bad guy for saying this, but here we go… My neighbor was outside mowing his lawn completely shirtless in the middle of the afternoon, right in a residential neighborhood where families, kids, and neighbors are constantly walking by. And before everyone jumps in with “it’s his property” or “it’s hot outside,” I get it. But when did basic standards and common decency become such a controversial topic? This isn’t the beach. It isn’t a pool. It isn’t a gym. It’s a neighborhood. Is throwing on a T-shirt really asking too much? Maybe I’m old-fashioned, but I was raised to believe that when you live around other people, you show at least a little awareness of the community around you. Nobody is saying he needs to wear a suit to mow the grass, but come on. Some neighbors laughed and said I was overreacting. Others agreed that certain things just don’t really belong in a family neighborhood. So I’m genuinely curious — am I being unreasonable here? Or have we just completely lowered the bar for what people consider appropriate in public now? See less

@baroncoleman @RealCandaceO Also, all the hours of debate and talking points that Rush did over the years became null and void after death because he shared the opposite opinion privately to a select few, making him the biggest hypocrite/liar.

Rush told all the top executives at EIB he wanted Blake to take over if anything happened to him. He said it all the time. There’s even a video of Rush saying it, but they won’t release it because @RealCandaceO wouldn’t accept it if they did.

@baroncoleman @RealCandaceO This offers a clear perspective: once you take away all the noise supporting the narrative, you realize just how ridiculous the claims are.

@LauraLoomer All lies except for the warning I feel the many bad actors gave Charlie before his death. Was it a final warning?

I warned everyone at TPUSA about Tucker. I even warned Charlie Kirk 2 weeks before he was killed. I was so upset about it, he invited me to his office 2 weeks before he died to talk about the problem of the Woke Reich. Then he was killed and Tucker hijacked his memorial and now he’s lying and saying Israel killed Charlie Kirk in an effort to help Tyler Robinson get off.

Josh Hammer? You mean the guy who lied in the very beginning about Charlie never swaying from Israel? When he was in the very txt thread above. Hammer cannot be trusted. To say Charlie went “back to pro Israel Support” where is your evidence? Months leading up to assassination there are several videos where he was asking all the same questions that currently get people labeled antisemite. Charlie isn’t the type to sway his thoughts or beliefs easily. He educated himself on every issue and was able to make an informed judgment on things.

You missed the part where Charlie prepped hard for pro-Israel talking points before UVU with Josh Hammer and a Rabbi, Dingus Also, Charlie thanked Josh and the Rabbi for tgeir help in the same text thread that Candace got her screenshot from. Funny how she left that out Numerous people cooborated Charlie was just frustrated because of the donor. Less than 24 hours before his death he apparently went back to pro-Israel support

Trust me. He has other sermons that are even more damning. I posted some takes on the biggest in your face ones. One was his last sermon before CK was assassinated and another is directly after. There’s also one moths prior where it was clear he was pleading with Charlie to pick the “right side” meaning Israel/zionists. He truly hasn’t gotten enough attention in the CK investigation.

🚨 Well this matters now! “Candace and Tucker are not safe in this world” On July 27th 2025 Rob posted this sermon “Has God Cast Away His People” THEN Rob deleted this sermon while in Israel Nov 14/25 we all remember the deleted sermon! But I recorded it Back in Oct. Rob McCoy retired July 2, 2025. Why is he doing this sermon 2 months before Charlie’s death??

It’s Tyler’s gun. Of course his dna is on the weapon. There is also 5 other peoples dna on the weapon. How did the bomb dogs not find the gun? If it in fact had been shot they would have pinged it. Very convenient that after already searching the area with and without dogs an FBI agent pulls up and goes straight to the spot. Confessed? The a shady discord group chat that at best seems planted and to specifically ensure Lance Twiggs isn’t implicated at all. Have you read the discord messages? His parents identified him? You mean the photo that looks NOTHING like Tyler Robinson? Family has debunked the media narratives and say that only 3% of what’s being said in media is true. If you want to blindly trust the narrative fine, but those of us you can think for ourselves refuse to let lies override logic.

@AmyCooper83 @BlakeSNeff Tyler Robinson’s DNA is literally on the murder weapon, he confessed, and then he surrendered after his parents identified him. Clinging to unhinged conspiracy theories when the evidence points to the suspect is what actually is ridiculous.

Actually, those of us who knew Charlie best, a group that doesn’t include Tucker, do think that Tyler Robinson did it and was motivated by transgender radicalism. Tucker is lying.

Anyone who follows you both KNOW that this isn’t true. Before you guys collaborated it was like divine timing and your messages both intertwined and worked together in a way that you could only conclude that God was orchestrating it. In the beginning you were clear that you were focused on the “who” and not the “how” and I believe they both have collided at this point in the investigation. Now that we have a lot of key components the how may actually narrow down the who. This posters take on Barons response is grossly misleading and inaccurate. These people are insufferable.

This is crap. As much as I watch Baron’s show— in the beginning of his investigative work I simply was not a viewer. So a lot of times I learn that he covered things in the past and we simply had no idea . It takes a lot of work to prep your own show, plus run a household with 4 toddlers. As you all know, we ALWAYS credit any creator who we take stuff from and encourage people to watch their content. It actually makes me feel like I wasted my time when I learn he’s covered something bc I could have saved myself a full day of research and simply ripped his content, (as I proudly do, often, on my show). I constantly call Baron in private, and send him information and sources and vice versa. The Charlie Kirk investigation really is a team effort and we’ve gotten this far precisely bc there hasn’t been pettiness brewing between creators.

🔻Trouble in paradise between @RealCandaceO and @baroncoleman It’s been obvious over the last few weeks Candace has been parroting Baron’s talking points. This week it has become blatantly obvious. 🔸 does Candace do any of her own research? Tonight Baron received a superchat and it’s obvious by his facial expression he’s bothered by Candace stealing his work.

@iknowitsilly Your take on the video and post is extremely misleading.

🔸 Candace Owens throws Baron Coleman under the bus 🔸 They conspire together to defame Charlie Kirk’s legacy, Erika Kirk’s reputation, and TPUSA. Candace just let the world know Baron reluctantly admits he does allow her to take his work. The look on his face, the dramatic pause tells us he is not happy with the fact she’s using him, but he would lose his audience if he said what he actually felt about this situation. But the doors just opened even more for TPUSA and Erika Kirk for more discovery and subpoena power. 🔸Trouble in Paradise indeed. But remember Baron, Jesus loves you ❤️

Gubernatorial candidate must return thousands of dollars in contribution... youtu.be/0_obgKo3yS8?is… via @YouTube

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman