Amy VanMercer

253 posts

Amy VanMercer banner
Amy VanMercer

Amy VanMercer

@AmyK_Mercer

stories - production - voice over work. occasionally extroverted-introvert. low profile

Canada Katılım Nisan 2009
83 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler
Microdots
Microdots@DropMicrodots·
Karen is Free
Microdots tweet media
English
216
1K
7K
169.9K
Larry Forman
Larry Forman@TheDUIGuyPlus·
"We have a verdict. But we don't have a verdict." - Bev You can't make it up.
English
115
96
1.8K
72.1K
Bederow Law
Bederow Law@Bederowlaw·
This is totally sane and well-reasoned legal analysis…
Bederow Law tweet media
English
890
122
2.9K
143.9K
Sue O'Connell: COMMENTATOR, not a reporter
Serious question for Karen Read trial watchers: Which witness testimony are you most curious about in terms of juror reactions? (Defense is still presenting their case) Drop your thoughts in replies or DMs
English
373
4
337
91.1K
Amy VanMercer
Amy VanMercer@AmyK_Mercer·
@queen__valerie_ She is either drinking a cup of tea or a good quality whiskey - neat, while playing fetch in her beautifully manicured backyard with her 4 rescue dogs 🥰 (at least that’s what I hope)
English
0
0
1
14
Valerie
Valerie@queen__valerie_·
I miss Dr. Russell 🥺 Did she make it home? What is she doing right now? 😭#KarenReadTrial
English
62
13
934
32.4K
TrueCrimeGal
TrueCrimeGal@TrueCrimeGal85·
Careful Hank you’re going to have a stalker for the next 20 years
English
37
22
470
30.5K
Aidan Kearney
Aidan Kearney@DoctorTurtleboy·
Has the door been opened for the defense to call me to refute all of the lies Spanky Brennan just said about me?
English
241
111
2.5K
93.8K
Amy VanMercer
Amy VanMercer@AmyK_Mercer·
@publicpolicyman After investing hundreds of hours as a layperson watching trial footage, hearings, and reviewing publicly available documents and evidence, IMO Karen Read is innocent.
English
0
0
1
139
Mark Weyermuller
Mark Weyermuller@publicpolicyman·
I am not following the karen Read trial very carefully but she looks like she was framed. There are no eyewitnesses so whole case is circumstantial. Is she innocent? foxnews.com/us/critical-wi…
English
4
4
13
1.4K
Amy VanMercer retweetledi
Lawyer You Know
Lawyer You Know@LawyerYouKnow·
Celebrating half a million amazing subscribers today! We couldn’t have done it without your continued support and trust. From all of us on the LYK team—Thank You for making this possible. Here’s to many more milestones ahead! As a special thank you, use the discount code 'lyk500k' at lawyeryouknow.com to receive 25% off your order! (code only valid until June 4)
English
75
27
1.2K
45.9K
Amy VanMercer
Amy VanMercer@AmyK_Mercer·
@LawyerYouKnow Based on his first attempt- I have to disagree w you on this one,Peter. IMO Brennan was not so much poking holes but rather using psychological manipulation on repeat with the witness. It was weird & a little embarrassing when he continued to circle back.
English
0
0
0
17
Lawyer You Know
Lawyer You Know@LawyerYouKnow·
Brennan’s cross style is good IMO. He’s a real criminal defense attorney. He’s used to poking holes and chipping at credibility. He makes you wonder if the expert has all the info and what is he really saying or proving? Will that be enough as a prosecutor? What did you take away from this witness’s direct that helps the defense?
English
447
10
394
84.1K
Emily See
Emily See@TheEmilySee·
Once again, I haven’t followed a trial the way I’m watching this one. Is it normal for “expert” witnesses to be this difficult and confrontational??? And for that matter, is it normal for 85% of the CW witnesses to turn into stubborn children during cross examination??? DYSLEXIC??? SHUT UP, sir
English
172
90
1.9K
85.8K
Amy VanMercer
Amy VanMercer@AmyK_Mercer·
@Bederowlaw Not to mention, who even remembers the commonwealth’s theory of the case at this point?! This is wild!
English
0
0
2
50
Bederow Law
Bederow Law@Bederowlaw·
If Brennan had brought out on direct the issues related to his expert's academic issues (as any prosecutor even willing to call this expert would do), it would hav been over in cross examination. By not doing that and diving into in redirect, he caused a second round of this devastating subject (with new evidence not used on cross), all while exposing for the jury his intent to conceal the evidence. He also destroyed the hour he spent on redirect trying o emphasize the reliability of the data. The only thing the jury will be left with is that Burgess and Aperture appear to be frauds. This examination was an exercise in exactly how not handle the direct (and redirect) of a witness with serious credibility issues.
English
61
86
1.3K
49.1K
Amy VanMercer
Amy VanMercer@AmyK_Mercer·
@Bederowlaw Between that Olympic-level reach and all the self-defense, HB isn’t making a case - he’s losing the plot in real time.
English
0
0
0
34
Bederow Law
Bederow Law@Bederowlaw·
Not this is the most important point, but putting Burgess in the same category as Oprah (who does have a college degree) and Steve Jobs is silly. Neither of these 2 brilliant business minds is alleged to have lied about their credentials or held themselves out as technical experts.
English
71
89
1.6K
51K