
Amy VanMercer
253 posts

Amy VanMercer
@AmyK_Mercer
stories - production - voice over work. occasionally extroverted-introvert. low profile
Canada Katılım Nisan 2009
83 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler


@TheDUIGuyPlus This is so unbelievable. What is in the water in Norfolk County?!
English

I love these men!
The dedication, drive, and belief in justice is inspiring!
Let's not forget Ms. Little ❤️
@BostonDefender
@bobalessi
Thank you.
English

@queen__valerie_ She is either drinking a cup of tea or a good quality whiskey - neat, while playing fetch in her beautifully manicured backyard with her 4 rescue dogs 🥰 (at least that’s what I hope)
English

I miss Dr. Russell 🥺 Did she make it home? What is she doing right now? 😭#KarenReadTrial
English

@publicpolicyman After investing hundreds of hours as a layperson watching trial footage, hearings, and reviewing publicly available documents and evidence, IMO Karen Read is innocent.
English

I am not following the karen Read trial very carefully but she looks like she was framed. There are no eyewitnesses so whole case is circumstantial. Is she innocent?
foxnews.com/us/critical-wi…
English
Amy VanMercer retweetledi

Celebrating half a million amazing subscribers today! We couldn’t have done it without your continued support and trust.
From all of us on the LYK team—Thank You for making this possible. Here’s to many more milestones ahead!
As a special thank you, use the discount code 'lyk500k' at lawyeryouknow.com to receive 25% off your order! (code only valid until June 4)
English

@LawyerYouKnow Based on his first attempt- I have to disagree w you on this one,Peter. IMO Brennan was not so much poking holes but rather using psychological manipulation on repeat with the witness. It was weird & a little embarrassing when he continued to circle back.
English

Brennan’s cross style is good IMO. He’s a real criminal defense attorney. He’s used to poking holes and chipping at credibility. He makes you wonder if the expert has all the info and what is he really saying or proving? Will that be enough as a prosecutor?
What did you take away from this witness’s direct that helps the defense?
English

Once again, I haven’t followed a trial the way I’m watching this one. Is it normal for “expert” witnesses to be this difficult and confrontational???
And for that matter, is it normal for 85% of the CW witnesses to turn into stubborn children during cross examination???
DYSLEXIC??? SHUT UP, sir
English

@Bederowlaw Not to mention, who even remembers the commonwealth’s theory of the case at this point?! This is wild!
English

If Brennan had brought out on direct the issues related to his expert's academic issues (as any prosecutor even willing to call this expert would do), it would hav been over in cross examination. By not doing that and diving into in redirect, he caused a second round of this devastating subject (with new evidence not used on cross), all while exposing for the jury his intent to conceal the evidence. He also destroyed the hour he spent on redirect trying o emphasize the reliability of the data. The only thing the jury will be left with is that Burgess and Aperture appear to be frauds. This examination was an exercise in exactly how not handle the direct (and redirect) of a witness with serious credibility issues.
English

@Bederowlaw Between that Olympic-level reach and all the self-defense, HB isn’t making a case - he’s losing the plot in real time.
English

Successful day of #smallmouthbass fishing with kylienorcross kevnorcross @drewmercer Now #huphollandhup instagram.com/p/qFVZ58h5yV/
English

Distance can't keep us from #huphollandhup "ing" together!! imstlhr zammyv #oranje… instagram.com/p/p1aNCsB5xT/
English






