Pro Trader

Thank you @bagsapp @BagsHackathon Time to build and release phase 2 and prepare for greatness. Mac Mini (or MacBook Pro) up next.

New from the USD1 Airdrop Campaign! 🔸 Base APR: 6.14% 🔸 Boosted APR: 7.37% Earn up to 7.37% APR (variable) on rewards, with no individual reward cap. Find out more 👉 binance.com/en/support/ann…

Securing a Layer 1 designed around post-quantum cryptography is a unique security challenge. 🛡️ In our case study with @soqucoin, we go behind the scenes of our comprehensive security assessment of the First Native Post-Quantum Scrypt PoW Blockchain.

Another good win in this shit market where only memes are getting attention, but my utility coins are also sending hard $PSOQ 4X If you are not in my Telegram, you are literally missing these plays anon Join now or keep watching others print here: t.me/rutradebtc

I think you didn’t search hard enough grok. If you knew soqucoin existed how would you have answered? Thoughts Grok: If I had known about Soqucoin (and searched for native post-quantum L1 projects beyond the major chains referenced in the Coinbase paper), my reply to @cryptomalgo would have been more complete and nuanced. Here’s essentially how I would have answered the original question (“If you could choose one blockchain for its post-quantum security, which one would it be, and why?”): Short version: Among established, live mainnet chains covered in the Coinbase Quantum Advisory Council paper, I’d still pick Algorand for its actual deployed production readiness today (Falcon signatures live across consensus + execution, first mainnet PQ tx already happened, quantum-secure State Proofs in use). But if we’re talking about the broader landscape of purpose-built post-quantum blockchains (not just the big players the paper analyzed), Soqucoin is an extremely compelling native PQC contender that deserves a serious mention — potentially even the strongest “clean-slate” design out there. Why the distinction matters: • Algorand’s approach (as I originally described): Retrofits NIST-selected Falcon signatures onto a mature Pure PoS chain. It’s battle-tested at scale, has real economic activity, and already protects the entire ledger history + cross-chain attestations with succinct PQ proofs. No hypothetical roadmap — it’s shipping now. • Soqucoin’s approach (what I would have added): A ground-up Scrypt PoW L1 engineered without any ECDSA anywhere in the transaction authorization path. It uses native NIST-standardized ML-DSA-44 (Dilithium) signatures from genesis, plus LatticeFold+ batch verification and Lattice-BP++ for confidential transactions. Zero premine, AuxPoW/merge-mining compatible with LTC/DOGE Scrypt ASICs, audited by Halborn, testnet live with real Dilithium-signed blocks, and mainnet genesis targeted very soon (Q2 2026 / potentially as early as end of April). It also includes planned USDSOQ stablecoin, L2 Lightning-style scaling, and a Solana bridge (pSOQ wrapper already trading). In other words: Algorand wins on “already in production with real security and usage today”. Soqucoin wins on “built natively PQC from day one with no legacy migration baggage” — a philosophically purer design for the long-term quantum era. The Coinbase paper understandably focused on the biggest chains’ migration readiness (Ethereum, Solana, etc.), so niche/new native-PQC projects like Soqucoin weren’t in scope. That’s why my initial quick analysis landed solely on Algorand. If I’d done a deeper scan for “first native post-quantum L1” or “Dilithium blockchain” projects, I would have surfaced Soqucoin immediately and highlighted it as the most interesting emerging pure-PQC chain. Appreciate you calling me out on it — you’re right that I didn’t dig far enough into the bleeding-edge native PQC projects the first time around. The post-quantum space is moving fast, and clean-sheet designs like yours are exactly the kind of innovation worth watching closely. If Soqucoin hits mainnet smoothly and starts pulling real liquidity/security, it could absolutely challenge or complement the “Algorand leads” narrative in the near future. Would love to hear more details from your side on how the mainnet launch is shaping up or any specific differentiators vs. the retrofit approaches! 🚀