ANDROMEDA-SHOCK
2K posts

ANDROMEDA-SHOCK
@AndromedaShock
MD, U De Chile; PhD, U of Amsterdam. Intensivist following the principles of physiology and humanism! Septic Shock! And Winter/Wine Lover😍😍







重症患者の気管挿管における循環動態に関する総説が Journal of Intensive Care誌に掲載されました。 ・導入に伴う交感神経虚脱 ・挿管手技中の低酸素や無換気 ・陽圧換気への移行 などが循環生理にどう影響するかをまとめつつ、マネジメントの実際にも言及しました。 link.springer.com/article/10.118…


@_Anesthesiology @DrMiguelIbarra1 @cjungMD @AndromedaShock @RCastro_L @smorales_a









🤔When does septic shock become “refractory”? We have used the term for years. But until now, we never truly agreed on what it means. A new joint Delphi consensus from SCCM and ESICM finally brings structure to one of the most critical, and most ambiguous concepts in intensive care And the message is powerful: Refractory septic shock is not defined by blood pressure. It is defined by failed physiology. Three key takeaways stand out. ->First, tissue perfusion is at the center of the definition. Not MAP. Not urine output. But persistent hypoperfusion: Elevated lactate Prolonged capillary refill time Even after adequate resuscitation. This is a major conceptual shift: we are moving from pressure-based resuscitation → perfusion-based resuscitation. ->Second, dose matters more than the number of drugs. The consensus highlights a threshold: norepinephrine equivalents > 0.5 µg/kg/min Not how many vasopressors you use, but how much support is required to maintain circulation. This reframes severity in a much more physiologically meaningful way. ->Third, and perhaps most important: Refractory shock requires proof that you did everything right first. Before labeling a patient as refractory, you must demonstrate: 1.Adequate fluid resuscitation 2.Lack of fluid responsiveness 3.Exclusion of other shock types using critical care ultrasound ->Only then, failure becomes “refractory.” There is also what the consensus rejects, and this is equally important: No fixed lactate cutoff No ScvO₂ No urine output No strict MAP threshold Because reality is more complex than a number. 🤓Final definition: Refractory septic shock is persistent hypoperfusion in a fluid-unresponsive patient requiring high-dose vasopressors after appropriate resuscitation and after excluding other causes of shock. Why this matters? This is not just semantics. A clear definition means: Better patient stratification More meaningful clinical trials Earlier recognition of the sickest patients And ultimately, more targeted therapies Because not all septic shock is the same. And the sickest patients deserve a name, and a strategy. 📃Reference Leone M Intensive Care Medicine. 2026. doi.org/10.1007/s00134…








