Andy Malone

3.8K posts

Andy Malone banner
Andy Malone

Andy Malone

@AndyM1928

NYC based libertarian, New Urbanist, construction manager. Born and raised in Nebraska (+WA)

Yonkers, NY Katılım Ağustos 2008
450 Takip Edilen584 Takipçiler
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
Is it that by its indefiniteness it shadows forth the heartless voids and immensities of the universe, and thus stabs us from behind with the thought of annihilation, when beholding the white depths of the milky way? Or is it, that as in essence whiteness is not so much a color as the visible absence of color; and at the same time the concrete of all colors; is it for these reasons that there is such a dumb blankness, full of meaning, in a wide landscape of snows- a colorless, all-color of atheism from which we shrink? And when we consider that other theory of the natural philosophers, that all other earthly hues- every stately or lovely emblazoning- the sweet tinges of sunset skies and woods; yea, and the gilded velvets of butterflies, and the butterfly cheeks of young girls; all these are but subtile deceits, not actually inherent in substances, but only laid on from without; so that all deified Nature absolutely paints like the harlot, whose allurements cover nothing but the charnel-house within; and when we proceed further, and consider that the mystical cosmetic which produces every one of her hues, the great principle of light, for ever remains white or colorless in itself, and if operating without medium upon matter, would touch all objects, even tulips and roses, with its own blank tinge- pondering all this, the palsied universe lies before us a leper; and like wilful travellers in Lapland, who refuse to wear colored and coloring glasses upon their eyes, so the wretched infidel gazes himself blind at the monumental white shroud that wraps all the prospect around him.
English
0
0
0
13
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
There is no substitute for deeply understanding your home systems and appliances. With YouTube and ChatGPT it has never been easier, but it does take attention and stone commitment. Home warranties are a scam. The appliance manufacturer has a warranty too for a lot less.
Ethan Brooks@alt_w_v_g

The dishwasher broke My wife said "good thing we have the home warranty" I said nothing I've been paying $62 a month for three years for this moment $2,232 for the peace of mind that when something breaks someone will come to the house and tell me it's not covered I called 47 minutes on hold They sent a technician Arrival window: Tuesday through Thursday between 8am and 5pm My analyst delivers faster than that And he still hasn't fixed the gridlines He showed up Wednesday at 4:47pm Looked at the dishwasher Opened the door Closed the door Touched something underneath Said "not covered" 90 seconds That's faster than my bank lets me prove I'm human I said "what's covered" He said "the motor" I said "what's wrong with it" He said "not the motor" I said "convenient" He said the service fee is $75 I paid a man $75 to open my dishwasher, close my dishwasher, and say two words My analyst could do that And he's not even that good I called the warranty company back 38 minutes on hold Requested the policy 129 pages I read all 129 pages Because that's what I do The coverage section is 34 pages The exclusions section is 58 The business model is right there In the margins Where nobody reads Except me Page 91 says "all mechanical and electrical components essential to appliance function are covered under standard service" Page 104 excludes control panels A control panel is an electrical component essential to appliance function Their own document contradicts itself 13 pages apart I highlighted both Sent them an email Subject line: "Plz fix. Thx." Attached both pages No other context Took them three days to send a technician Took them 4 hours to call me back when I found the loophole Funny how that works They covered the repair Waived the $75 And I canceled the warranty anyway Because a contract that contradicts itself isn't a contract It's a suggestion My wife said "so we're canceling" I said "we're canceling" She said "and the dishwasher" I said "fixed. They're covering it." She said "how" I said "I read the policy" She said "all 129 pages" I said "the exclusions section starts on page 47. The coverage section ends on page 34. There are 13 pages between them where they hoped nobody would look." She looked at me Then she said "you're unbelievable" I said "I just saved us $744 a year and got a free dishwasher repair. I'm not unbelievable. I'm thorough." She looked at the ceiling The dishwasher works now The warranty is canceled And the policy has been read By at least one person Probably the first Make common sense common again Plz fix. Thx. Sent from my iPhone

English
0
0
0
18
Andy Malone retweetledi
Andy Malone retweetledi
Adam Singer
Adam Singer@AdamSinger·
Anyone proposing taxing of *unrealized gains* - and it doesn't matter on whom - is profoundly stupid. One of the worst ideas we've seen in modern times. Vote against anyone considering this, and if you have to leave the state before it's too late. Economically illiterate clowns
Adam Singer tweet media
English
123
168
1K
28.7K
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
I like Buttigieg. Of all the DOT secretaries in my lifetime, he and I are on the closest to same page about transportation, but I find the paltry amount he was able achieve offensive and alarming. To my mind, it makes him totally unqualified for any future roles.
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

The proposed community notes and comments from Dems on this are ridiculous but instructive. The claim is that all the money is being tracked by DOT, and they point to the DOT website or DOT spreadsheets. The problem is that none of the spreadsheets add up to $2 trillion. So where is the rest of the money? Now, $800 million of that is from @SecDuffy’s research, which he explains on the Shawn Ryan show. I trust Duffy, but if you don’t, you still need to explain where the $1.2 trillion went…. Because neither side argues that Mayor Pete was authorized to do that. The DOT spreadsheet most often linked to shows just under half of that money spent on projects across the nation. So where’s the other half? The most charitable, unproven explanation for that is that the money is still in the Treasury. So the most charitable defense of @PeteButtigieg I can find is that Congress gave him a mandate to fix our infrastructure, and he did a half-ass job. If we are being extremely kind, he still should be arrested. People are dying on those broken roads, and he was criminally negligent… too busy breaking the Hatch Act on late-night TV to spend our money effectively. But being that charitable makes a lot of assumptions. You see, those DOT spreadsheets tracking all the money tell us which projects got cash but not how that cash was spent. They tell us Pete spent billions writing checks. Did those checks end up in the hands of labor unions, the mafia, or corrupt government officials? IDK, and I don’t want to speculate, but we all know that infrastructure spending is a magnet for organized crime and labor unions. This is well documented. The question is what oversight did Pete provide? So the fact that Pete wrote checks and that’s marked on a spreadsheet in DOT tells us nothing. And this is the problem with the left. They think just because the trillions of dollars are marked in a book somewhere, it counts as being legitimately spent. It’s all gaslighting because if you drive almost anywhere in this nation, you can see with your own eyes that the infrastructure is no better than when Pete was given the cash 5 years ago… and in many cases, worse. And the situation is WAY worse on the roads I drive on that have signs saying “This was paid for with Bipartisan Infrastructure Act Funds” because those roads have been under construction for YEARS. You don’t need to be a forensic accountant to know that a construction project contains fraud… the fact that a road or bridge upgrade is taking more time than it took this nation to win the entire Second World War is all the proof you need to know it contains fraud. Community Notes or no Community Notes, IDC, Mayor Pete should be arrested regardless!

English
0
0
1
32
Andy Malone retweetledi
Ben Furnas
Ben Furnas@bfurnas·
Love this graphic from @NYC_DOT on the 9th Avenue transformation. Right now 51% of the people who use the street are on foot and 10% are on bikes, but only 30% of the space is dedicated to pedestrians and only 6% for cyclists. nyc.gov/html/dot/html/…
Ben Furnas tweet media
English
25
72
594
20.2K
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
It's a barbell situation. A well constructed, walkable town with an affordable public marina and lots of preserved land around the rest of the lake is worth far more on a per acre basis, but without that level of organization more land is better than less on a lakefront full of single family properties.
English
0
0
0
67
VB Knives
VB Knives@Empty_America·
Good lot locations are *always* worth it if you can possibly make the payment. The lesser house within walking distance of the lake/mountain or on more land is better than the good house on a nothing lot. The house set way back from the road is always worth the premium, etc.
English
5
4
159
4.2K
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
@King_Sukunaaa We are apparently better off putting 13 year olds in painting reproduction sweatshops than in art school.
English
0
0
0
7
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
@King_Sukunaaa Does the acquisition of an arts or architecture degree make the bearer more or less likely to create joyful decorative art or more likely to create gauche minimalism? The degree is actually a burden on true public art.
English
1
0
0
106
Andy Malone retweetledi
Wrath Of Gnon
Wrath Of Gnon@wrathofgnon·
Some examples of California Baroque, by Christopher Hasbun, Los Angeles. Please give him three acres and a tram line.
Wrath Of Gnon tweet mediaWrath Of Gnon tweet mediaWrath Of Gnon tweet mediaWrath Of Gnon tweet media
English
9
57
826
20.5K
Andy Malone retweetledi
Robbert Leusink
Robbert Leusink@robbertleusink·
Medieval city planners built streets that curved, narrowed, and wound without logic Le Corbusier called them donkey paths and spent his career trying to replace them with straight lines Those streets survived a thousand years of war, plague, and fire His buildings are already being demolished
Robbert Leusink tweet mediaRobbert Leusink tweet mediaRobbert Leusink tweet media
English
44
119
1.5K
79.7K
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
Classic example of comparative advantage at work. Texas can use solar for domestic power and export most the fossil fuels to places that need it more. Love it.
Gaurab Chakrabarti@Gaurab

@OilfieldSlanger You’ve missed the point. I’m an ardent supporter of oil/gas. Prices for Texas’s major export just increased dramatically.

English
0
0
0
14
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
@theficouple What if, just hear me out, you bought a 5 year old Model Y? New car, off the lot, still feels like a very rich-coded thing to do - especially now that most cars easily last well past 200k mi.
English
6
0
5
550
theficouple
theficouple@theficouple·
When you bought the $50,000 Tesla Model Y to save on gas & maintenance. Then you learned: - It loses 20-35% of its value by year 3 - It loses 55-58% of its value by year 5 So by year 5 you lost $35,000+ of value? ....Congrats on saving ~$1,000/yr on gas.
theficouple tweet media
English
2.7K
199
2.1K
831.9K
Andy Malone
Andy Malone@AndyM1928·
Chuck Norris actually died 20 years ago. Death just finally got up the courage to tell him. ... Chuck Norris walked up to the pearly gates & St Peter said, “Oh wow Mr. Norris, the big guy wants to see you immediately.” So he gets escorted in to meet God and without missing a beat Chuck says, “before we get started, I just wanna let you know you’re sitting in my chair.” ... Death took Chuck Norris. Death is in the hospital on life support. ... RIP Chuck Norris, you had a great run
English
0
0
0
44
Andy Malone retweetledi
Steven Fiorillo
Steven Fiorillo@stevenfiorillo·
This clip shows @GovKathyHochul recent comments regarding the exodus of high net worth individuals to states like Florida and Texas. It revealed a fundamental misunderstanding of how capital flows in a modern economy. Pleading with former residents to return from Palm Beach to fund "generous social programs" is not a fiscal policy. It's a glaring admission of an uncompetitive tax structure. These are the realities that many leaders in NY are having a hard time understanding: · Taxpayers are not charities. It is not the responsibility of any individual taxpayer to subsidize an uncompetitive state budget out of a misplaced sense of "patriotism." Individuals and corporations have a fiduciary responsibility to their families and shareholders to locate where they can maximize their economic potential. · The "captive" era is over. Governor Hochul said the quiet part out loud. New York used to rely on a geographical monopoly. People had to be in Manhattan to work on Wall Street, effectively making them "captives" to the state's tax regime. Remote work didn't just change where we work, it destroyed that monopoly. · Begging is not a strategy. Admitting that New York is in direct competition with states that have a lower tax burden is a good first step, but the proposed solution of asking people to voluntarily cut checks is absurd. Texas and Florida aren't winning because they are asking nicely. Their winning because of tax arbitrage. · Competitive tax policy in NY is the only answer. If New York wants to reverse the massive outflow of capital, talent, and corporate headquarters, it needs to fundamentally rethink its tax policy. You cannot tax a state into prosperity, and you cannot guilt trip an economy into growth. When you tax people past the point where the math makes sense, they leave. When they leave, the burden falls on everyone who doesn’t have the resources to relocate. It’s time to take a common sense approach to policy and make the great state of New York competitive again Capital goes where it is treated best. Until New York decides to actually compete in the tax policy game the flights to Palm Beach and Austin will continue to be strictly one-way. The reality is that New York has lost $111 billion in net adjusted gross income over the last decade from residents moving to other states. That’s not hypothetical, that’s $111 billion in taxable income that used to fund schools, subways, police, and infrastructure that is now funding those things in Florida and Texas rather than New York. This is not my data, it's the data from the IRS. I love this state, but I am extremely worried for it’s future. We should be building a thriving ecosystem with an abundance of opportunities for New Yorkers, but instead we are pushing entrepreneurs and businesses to states that are more competitive with policy. @patrickbetdavid @PBDsPodcast @amitisinvesting
Patrick Bet-David@patrickbetdavid

I thought no one was leaving NY? You know things are bad when your Governor is begging New Yorkers to go to Palm Beach & bring the wealthy back. You wouldn’t have to BEG if you had better policies. By the way, the mass exodus hasn’t started yet.

English
34
53
292
29.6K