Anpan

ich bin alt genug um mich daran zu erinnern, dass frauen aktiv gefordert haben, männer sollen "emotionaler" sein, "weicher" und "gefühle zulassen und sie zu leben". gut 20 jahre später passt das auch wieder nicht, außer man kompensiert sie (finanziell) dafür. nun ja.

To blame humans for 100% of the carbon dioxide rise is simplistic and misleading. It suggests the natural world - with its tectonic shifts, mid-ocean ridge volcanism, feedback mechanisms and massive water vapor flux - all suddenly vanished in 1850. The greening of the planet (confirmed by NASA) proves the biosphere is actively utilising this CO2, yet the crisis narrative treats the Earth as a passive victim rather than a self-regulating, dynamic system. It conveniently tries to frame humans as careless or even as evil. It is more like a case of self loathing. You are completely ignoring the natural world and the real heavy lifters of Earth’s climate: the oceans and the hydrological cycle. The focus on a 150-ppm rise in CO2 bypasses the reality that the oceans contain 50 times more carbon than the atmosphere. Oceans hold 1,000 times the heat capacity. They contain 91-92% of all the entire world's retained heat energy. Water is 1,000 times denser and heavier than the air, a fine inert vapour by comparison We are currently observing the tail end of a multi-century adjustment, as the deep ocean responds to solar and orbital cycles that began long before the industrial revolution. This is how the natural world turns, very slowly. The CO2 rise isn't a human footprint crushing the natural world out of existence, it’s an echo from a complex feedback loop involving the entire planetary engine.