Anthony Emtman

449 posts

Anthony Emtman banner
Anthony Emtman

Anthony Emtman

@Anthony_Emtman

Always Joyful. Never Satisfied. Trust is a product 👉 Building Trust @Pathize_ & @ikigai_fund || Former: Captain @usairforce || Not investment advice

Puerto Rico Katılım Ekim 2016
1.9K Takip Edilen1.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Don't wait for 'One Day' to tell your loved ones what they mean to you. Keeping this in mind … At my parents' 60th birthday, I uncovered 3 universal needs we all share. Time is always of the essence – we simply have far fewer days left than we let ourselves believe. Embrace family time as an opportunity to express what's in your heart. Avoid the regret of silence – of feelings left unsaid. This holiday season, let's fill our time with words that matter. Why This Matters To You. This is about the conversations that we often postpone. The words we too often leave unspoken. It is about making the most of what little time we get those who matter most. It's about universal human needs that we all share. P.S. Please feel free to share your thoughts/coaching. I know this video and my speech isn’t perfect (I finished it as I was walking up to speak 😆). I’m sharing this because: 1) If these stories and lessons can inspire just one meaningful conversation, it's a victory. 2) I need to continue leaning into our culture of “Remain Courageous”, opting for action. “Perfection is the enemy of progress.” *** Did this help you? Would this help someone in your life? Please feel free to share it with others. Follow me @Anthony_Emtman for more in the future!
English
6
6
33
16.8K
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Bureaucracy just broke. Bureaucracy wasn't dumb. It is the most sophisticated coordination technology humanity ever built. We needed it to build trust with one another and work toward common goals. Until now (and this has happened dozens of times throughout history). Now every organization on the planet faces the velocity paradox: AI multiplies action volume by orders of magnitude. The limiting factor is no longer intelligence ... it’s throughput of desirable actions and decisions. It's how quickly an action can be taken while also provably inside the "bumpers on the bowling alley" ... internal policy, external regulations, culture, ... Enterprises refuse to move at the speed of AI if that also means breaking policy/regulation and increasing risk ... Paradoxically, if enterprises continue to move at the speed of a committee ... they'll suffer the consequences of the Innovator's Dilemma at a speed we've never seen before in history. Effectively, every enterprise today will either face the pain of rearchitecting the entirety of how they're "organized" ... OR ... they'll face the pain of watching others take over their market "Pain is the hammer that moves the mortals' heart" This paradigm shift is gravitational. You can depend on it happening with certainty. So, the correct game theory is to focus on what you can control in response to "this is happening" I prefer to seek first to understand the physics of the world we're shifting into. This paradigm shift is just the next evolution of Trust Structures that humans (and now technology) use to coordinate with one another. Trust Structures have broken before. Dozens of times. Now, they're breaking again. Again, this has happened before. But, why? What's the common theme? How can we avoid the same mistakes from the past? I enjoy investing in building understanding that is durable (not topical). I want my understanding to still be relevant in a decade. If you think similarly, this is why we're building @pathize_ ... our site is mostly a landing page right now with content exploring and seeking to understand these forces breaking the world as we know it today (more coming soon ... stoked! 😁) ... Start with the velocity paradox: pathize.com/why-now
Anthony Emtman tweet media
jack@jack

x.com/i/article/2038…

English
0
0
0
65
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
@cursor_ai changed their usage page to hide the per-prompt cost by default behind a horizontal scroll Funny how quickly these AI companies resort to dark patterns (@Lovable has similar problems) AI doesn't alter character ... it just amplifies what was already there
English
0
0
0
83
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Liquid Glass. 😊
English
0
0
2
102
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Complexity is free now: you add systems Cohesiveness is not: you build a system
English
0
0
1
59
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Agreed, @JayaGup10 ... the shift is from "what happened" to "why it happened" ... but after you can explain it, you need to actually do something about it The hard part is making that action safe AND automatic so you're not slowing people down ... that's what we've built (and are finishing) ... super stoked 😁
English
1
0
3
173
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
"The universe does not offer financing. This is hard to accept because modern life trains us to expect the opposite. We are addicted to "Buy Now, Pay Later." You live in the house before you pay off the mortgage. You get the degree before you pay off the loan. You eat the meal before you ask for the check. We are conditioned to enjoy the benefit today and pay the cost tomorrow. Achievement reverses the transaction. It requires full payment in advance (and regular payments forever). If you want a fit body, a calm mind, a healthy relationship, or financial independence, the cost is non-negotiable. You must do the work before you get the result. This is why most people quit. They pay a little, see nothing, and stop. They never make it far enough to see the first return arrive." -Tiny Thoughts @shaneparrish
English
0
0
4
122
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
If AI helps you go faster in the right direction, it'll also help you go faster in the wrong direction. Does this mean that it's becoming more or less important "measure twice and cut once"?
English
0
0
3
77
Jack Zhang
Jack Zhang@awxjack·
Stripe offered to acquire us for $1.2 billion when we had $2M in revenue. Today, we've raised $330M at an $8B valuation and reached $1B ARR. We could've died three times during this journey. This is the story I've never told anyone before:
Jack Zhang tweet media
English
1.5K
2K
29.8K
46.9M
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Men have fewer worries and drives centered on tribal belonging, so they skew more literal … saying what they mean and meaning what they say. Women often carry more fears around tribal belonging, especially during conflict, so they skew more relationally strategic … especially when fear spikes and they’re wanting to feel seen/heard. Part of that is more reputational/relational downside (quick reputational ripples into adjacent tribes), so there’s real pressure to be heard and understood … while also not losing belonging. Hyperbolic and absolute language showing up during those spikes may be an attempt to “make a point” or feel seen/heard from one perspective … and taken literally by the other. Unfortunately for both sides (as is true for most human interactions), men hear and interpret through their own perspective … so it’s natural to hear an absolute statement and assume it was meant literally. She could actually be meaning “I’m not feeling loved right now” … while saying “you’ve never loved me” … Sadly, he’ll hear the second one, believe it, and never forget it.
STUNNER@Cr7Godbrand

There are 3 painful sentences that shut a man’s mind down and make him quietly give up on his marriage “You never loved me.” “I never asked you to do any of this.” “You don’t care about me.” To a man, these words don’t feel like simple frustration. They feel like erasure, as if every mile he drove, every bill he paid, every problem he fixed, every moment he stayed when life was heavy suddenly meant nothing. What instantly runs through his mind is: “If she truly believes that, then what is the point of anything I do?” Men collapse internally when their entire contribution is dismissed in one sentence. It’s not the argument that breaks him. It’s the message beneath it: “Your love isn’t real. Your effort is invisible. Your presence doesn’t matter.” Something in him shuts down. Not out of lack of love, but from feeling useless. From feeling like no matter what he gives, what he builds, what he tries, it will never count. That is when a man emotionally checks out. He leaves, sometimes physically, sometimes just mentally, because he convinces himself of one heartbreaking truth: “Nothing I do will ever be seen.” Men don’t need perfection. They don’t need constant praise. They just need to believe that what they give matters. That their love is visible, valued, and not erased by a single sentence.

English
0
0
4
149
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Rowling didn't start writing Harry Potter until the 90s ... long after global literacy rates rose dramatically AI is doing the same thing for "digital literacy" Just because more people can create doesn't mean there are no great books left to write
Anthony Emtman tweet media
English
0
0
3
106
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
@signulll “fractured ontology” is a solid, succinct way to describe it @signulll … well said, will be using that myself 🤗
English
0
0
0
158
signüll
signüll@signulll·
even after the gemini 3 drop, google’s core issue is unchanged in many ways.. the ai endpoint is smeared across like so many different surfaces. do i generate slides in slides or in some new ai first tool made by labs? am i supposed to generate docs inside docs or inside gemini? should i use gemini in chrome or the standalone gemini web app? should i make veo videos in gemini or workspace? every interface markets itself as the real one. it’s a fractured ontology. nothing tells you where the intelligence is supposed to live. i guess the philosophy is that it is ubiquitous in each product but that is precisely why it is deeply confusing. chatgpt & claude feel sane by comparison because the user journey has a single gravitational center. you open one thing, you think in one place, & everything else hangs off that. this is probably cuz so many groups / products inside of google have their own competitive incentive structures. this is precisely what happened with microsoft copilot too.
English
82
25
796
53.6K
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
@jackmallers Shoot. Great idea. @USAA did the same thing to me. Same “we can’t tell you why” excuse too. Should’ve gotten mine framed.
English
0
0
0
140
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
Most meetings are compensating for unclear priorities.
English
1
0
2
75
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
@johnrushx What're your ideas on why corporate adoption of AI is going pretty slow? Also, re: OpenAI ... tough to compete with the balance sheet of Google.
English
2
0
3
1.9K
John Rush
John Rush@johnrushx·
The best analyses of the AI technology ever done, TLDR 🧵 :
John Rush tweet media
English
19
38
405
61.2K
Anthony Emtman
Anthony Emtman@Anthony_Emtman·
In a decade, the most successful organizations will look like meshes, not pyramids. Likely already true. But, now it’s existential.
English
0
0
1
69