Raam

7.8K posts

Raam

Raam

@Antriksh_IAH

Katılım Ağustos 2024
35 Takip Edilen108 Takipçiler
Raam retweetledi
BJP
BJP@BJP4India·
𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞! 🏡 Small lifestyle changes can create a big national impact. 𝐀𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞 — 𝐢𝐭’𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐡.
BJP tweet media
English
72
150
348
9.2K
Raam retweetledi
Stringg
Stringg@StringReveals·
If ₹60 crore was spent on 54 foreign trips, the country deserves answers. #WhoFundsRahul A sitting MP cannot keep flying across continents while leaving zero transparency behind - no audited disclosures, no funding trail, no accountability. For years we’ve been lectured on “questions”. Maybe it’s time Rahul Gandhi answers a few himself.
Stringg tweet media
English
63
1.2K
2.2K
17.4K
Raam retweetledi
BJP
BJP@BJP4India·
Rahul Gandhi’s Foreign Trips: The missing money trail. 🔎 ➡️ 54 foreign trips in 22 years ➡️ ₹60 crore estimated spend ➡️ Only ₹11 crore declared income That leaves a massive unexplained gap of nearly 50 crore. Who is funding Rahul Gandhi’s luxury foreign travels? If foreign entities are paying, where are the disclosures? If personal funds are being used, where are the matching tax records? The travel trail is public. The funding trail is still hidden. As Leader of Opposition, the country deserves answers. #WhoFundsRahul
English
46
236
432
11.1K
Raam retweetledi
BJP
BJP@BJP4India·
Rahul Gandhi earned ₹11 crore in 10 years. Let me tell you the 5 biggest mismatches: * In 2014-15, his total income was ₹86 lakh, while ₹4.5 crore was spent on foreign trips — 5.2 times higher. * In 2017-18, his total income was ₹1.20 crore, while ₹6 crore was spent on foreign trips. * In 2019-20, his income was ₹1.29 crore, while ₹4.6 crore was spent on foreign trips. * In 2018-19, Rahul Gandhi’s income was ₹1.22 crore, while ₹3.9 crore was spent. * And in 2021-22, his income was ₹1.03 crore, while ₹2.6 crore was spent on foreign trips. #WhoFundsRahul ? * Dr. Sambit Patra Watch full video: youtube.com/live/7RuafZM9F…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
77
230
547
16.4K
Raam retweetledi
Rekha Gupta
Rekha Gupta@gupta_rekha·
राहुल गांधी की रहस्यमयी विदेश यात्राओं का कच्चा चिट्ठा अब जनता के सामने है। अपनी घोषित आय से पाँच गुना अधिक खर्च करने वाले राहुल गांधी को देश को यह स्पष्ट करना चाहिए कि इन दौरों की फंडिंग का वास्तविक स्रोत क्या है। यदि इन यात्राओं का खर्च विदेशी संस्थाओं ने उठाया है, तो यह नियमों का सीधा उल्लंघन है। दूसरी ओर, यदि यह खर्च निजी है, तो इसे आधिकारिक घोषणाओं में क्यों छिपाया गया? पारदर्शिता का दावा करने वाले नेता प्रतिपक्ष की यह अपारदर्शिता गंभीर कानूनी सवाल खड़े करती है। राहुल गांधी को इन बेनामी खर्चों पर जवाब देना ही होगा। #WhoFundsRahul
BJP@BJP4India

राहुल गांधी की विदेश यात्राएं: आय और खर्च का बेमेल गणित! राहुल गांधी की विदेश यात्राओं और उनके आधिकारिक वित्तीय रिकॉर्ड के बीच का विरोधाभास स्पष्ट है। भारी खर्च: 2004-2026 के बीच 54 विदेश यात्राओं पर अनुमानित ₹60 करोड़ खर्च हुए। हालांकि, उनकी घोषित आय मात्र ₹11 करोड़ दिखाई गई है, जो खर्च से 5 गुना कम है। अनसुलझे सवाल: अगर खर्च विदेशी था, तो FCRA की मंजूरी कहां है? और अगर निजी था, तो यह टैक्स रिटर्न में क्यों नहीं है? कानून के अनुसार इन रिकॉर्ड्स का होना अनिवार्य है, लेकिन इनका गायब होना गंभीर सवाल खड़े करता है। #WhoFundsRahul

हिन्दी
70
115
383
9.7K
Raam retweetledi
THE JAT ASSOCIATION
THE JAT ASSOCIATION@Jatassociation·
कल तक राम नवमी शोभायात्राओं और हिंदू धर्म के वीरों की शोभायात्राओं पर पथराव हो रहा था | कानून का थोड़ा ढीला रवैया क्या दिखा कीटाणुओं ने अब रेलों पर पथराव करना रूटीन बना लिया |😡 हिंदुओं ज्यादा कुछ नहीं तो @RailMinIndia पर इतना दवाब बना दो कि इन जाहिलो को इलाज बांध दिया जाए | 😡
हिन्दी
119
3.3K
6.1K
120.2K
Raam retweetledi
BJP
BJP@BJP4India·
𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐥 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐢’𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐥 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝. 🧳 * He frequently goes on foreign trips. * Several visits included remarks against India on international platforms. But a serious question remains: #WhoFundsRahul
BJP tweet media
English
103
425
1.1K
16.3K
Raam retweetledi
BJP
BJP@BJP4India·
𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐥 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐢’𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐩 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐥. 💰🔍 𝟓𝟒 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐬. 𝟐𝟐 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬. ₹𝟔𝟎 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝. ₹𝟏𝟏 𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞. And Rahul Gandhi still refuses to explain who funds his luxury global lifestyle. The travel trail is PUBLIC. The money trail is MISSING. * 54 traceable foreign trips across Europe, the US, Middle East and Asia * One 2015 Southeast Asia tour cost ₹4.5 crore, over 5X his declared annual income that year * Multiple foreign trips flagged by CRPF between 2024–25 * Oman trip in May 2026 surfaced with no public itinerary or disclosure So who paid? * Foreign entities? Then where are the FCRA approvals? * Personal funds? Then where are the tax and forex disclosures? * Someone else? Then the questions become even bigger. 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲. 𝐖𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚’𝐬 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐎𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠? 𝐖𝐡𝐨 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠? 𝐖𝐡𝐨’𝐬 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐬? 54 trips. Rs 60 crore spend. A gap of 50 crores. 𝐎𝐧𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: #𝐖𝐡𝐨𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐬𝐑𝐚𝐡𝐮𝐥
BJP tweet media
English
799
1.4K
3.8K
155.5K
Raam
Raam@Antriksh_IAH·
ZXX
0
0
0
0
Raam retweetledi
Amit Malviya
Amit Malviya@amitmalviya·
THE FOREIGN TRIP MONEY TRAIL Rahul Gandhi, a sitting MP of India’s largest opposition party has taken at least 54 traceable foreign trips across 22 years in elected office. Italy. London. New York. Berlin. Vietnam. Cambodia. Qatar. UAE. Maldives. Bahrain. Singapore. Thailand. Oman. The trips are public. The funding trail is not. Using publicly visible travel patterns, security movement, five-star lodging norms, long-haul routing, staff accompaniment and event logistics, the visible foreign travel universe between 2004 and 2026 models to approximately ₹60 crore in expenditure. Across the same period, the MP’s own sworn Form 26 affidavits disclose cumulative income of roughly ₹11 crore. The arithmetic does not close. One 2015 South-East Asia tour alone is modelled at approximately ₹4.5 crore. The declared annual income for that same period: ₹86.55 lakh. A single trip costing 5.2 times the year’s declared income. This leaves only a few possibilities: 1Foreign entities funded the travel.
If so, where are the mandatory FCRA Section 6 permissions from the Ministry of Home Affairs? 2Personal funds paid for the trips.
If so, where are the corresponding disclosures in Income Tax filings, forex records, audited accounts and asset declarations? 3Someone else paid.
Then the question becomes even more serious: undisclosed gifts, foreign hospitality, unaccounted expenditure or black money. The law is not ambiguous. FCRA Section 6 requires prior written permission before any elected office-bearer accepts foreign hospitality from a foreign source. The Representation of the People Act requires audited party accounts. The Income Tax Act requires expenditure disclosure. The Lokpal framework requires asset declarations. Every lawful route leaves a paper trail. Where is it? The CRPF letter dated 10 September 2025 reportedly identified six undeclared foreign trips between December 2024 and September 2025 alone:
Italy.
Vietnam.
Dubai.
Qatar.
London.
Malaysia. Now comes the Oman lead from May 2026. No public itinerary.
No declared host.
No sanction file.
No audited disclosure.
No FCRA permission on record. The defence cannot simply be:
“Political vendetta.” Because this is not about rhetoric. It is about records. Either:
• the permissions exist,
• the party accounting exists,
• the tax disclosures exist,
• the forex trail exists,
• or they do not. If foreign universities, lobby groups, diaspora organisations or overseas entities paid for travel, lodging or hospitality, then the law required prior disclosure and approval. If personal funds paid, the expenditure should appear transparently in declared filings. If party funds paid, the audited line item should exist in Election Commission records. The silence is the story. Fifty-four foreign trips.
₹60 crore modelled spend.
₹11 crore declared income. Show one clean paper trail. One. Until then, the question remains: #WhoFundsRahul?
Amit Malviya tweet media
English
323
1.5K
2.5K
43.4K
Raam retweetledi
Ramesh Tiwari
Ramesh Tiwari@rameshofficial0·
🚨Heartbreaking Viral Video: Helpless Son Cries for His Injured Mother But Siddharthnagar DM Keeps Scrolling Reels A shocking video from the District Magistrate’s office in Siddharthnagar, Uttar Pradesh is spreading rapidly on social media. A distressed citizen went to the DM office pleading for help. His elderly mother was brutally attacked by monkeys in their village, suffering severe head injuries that needed multiple stitches. He had already filed written complaints with the District Forest Officer (DFO), but no action was taken. Instead of listening with empathy, the DM was seen continuously scrolling on his phone, completely ignoring the man’s painful appeal — no eye contact, no response, no assurance. This video has triggered massive public anger, with people calling it a clear example of administrative apathy. Where should common citizens go when those in power don’t even listen?
English
1.1K
8.4K
15.8K
480.7K
Raam retweetledi
CALL TO ACTIVISM
CALL TO ACTIVISM@CalltoActivism·
🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Donald Trump has arrived in China to find that President XI did NOT greet him at the airport. MAGA is in spin mode heralding the “red carpet treatment,” but the visit is already at a rocky start. Instead of a presidential welcome, Trump was greeted by US Ambassador to China David Perdue; Xi’s vice president, Han Zheng; China’s Ambassador to Washington Xie Feng; and Executive Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ma Zhaoxu. I’m sure Trump would hate if you shared this and rubbed it in all day long.
English
4.4K
27.7K
78.5K
3.6M
Raam retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
He was Satyendra Nath Bose, an Indian physicist whose quiet brilliance in the 1920s forever altered our understanding of the quantum world. In 1924, Bose, then a 30-year-old professor in British India, sent a groundbreaking manuscript directly to Albert Einstein. The paper offered a novel, more elegant derivation of Planck's law for blackbody radiation by treating light quanta (photons) as indistinguishable particles—a radical departure from classical statistical methods. Impressed by its insight, Einstein personally translated the work into German and facilitated its publication in the prestigious Zeitschrift für Physik. This exchange sparked a brief but profound collaboration. Einstein extended Bose's statistical approach to material atoms, predicting a bizarre new state of matter at ultra-low temperatures: what we now call a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), where particles behave as a single quantum wave. Bose's original framework became known as Bose-Einstein statistics, and the class of particles that obey it—those with integer spin, including photons, gluons, W and Z bosons, and the Higgs boson—was later named bosons in his honor by Paul Dirac. Unlike fermions (matter particles like electrons), which obey the Pauli exclusion principle and cannot occupy the same quantum state, bosons can pile into identical states en masse. This "social" behavior underpins extraordinary macroscopic phenomena: the coherent light of lasers, the zero-resistance flow in superconductors, and the collective quantum coherence in BECs. Despite the monumental impact—his statistics describe half of all fundamental particles and enabled key advances in quantum field theory, condensed matter physics, and particle physics—Bose remained remarkably unassuming. He continued teaching at universities in Dhaka and Calcutta (now Kolkata), mentored students, pursued ideas in X-ray crystallography, unified field theory, and other areas, and never sought the spotlight. Nominated several times for the Nobel Prize (notably for Bose-Einstein statistics and his later work), he was never awarded it, and his name rarely appears in popular accounts of 20th-century physics. There's a poignant humility in his story: a man whose legacy literally names one of the two fundamental families of particles in the universe, yet whose personal fame never matched the scale of his contribution. Bose reminds us that true influence often arrives without fanfare. Some breakthroughs echo through textbooks and technologies, while their creators work in the background, content to let the universe carry their ideas forward—even if history's spotlight rarely finds them.
Massimo tweet media
English
62
1.4K
5.7K
407.8K