Antsu Bear

Las personas con más cociente intelectual tienden a acostarse y levantarse más tarde (+52 minutos en promedio).

Having sex with the same person is like one tricking a champion in League of Legends at first it's awkward you don't know the combos you flash for kills you didn't need to flash for half the abilities miss because you don't know the range then something happens around game 50 the timings start clicking you stop thinking about what you're doing and start FEELING it your hands move before your brain does you know exactly what cooldowns are up without looking you can read every micro twitch and know what's about to happen by game 200 you've unlocked tech nobody else in the lobby can pull off combos that look impossible on paper movement patterns that only make sense once you've drilled them 10,000 times you've discovered things about the champion that the wiki doesn't even know meanwhile some guy who plays 100 different champions is wondering why he can't get past the laning phase he doesn't know the matchup he doesn't know the tempo he doesn't know what works at level 3 vs level 6 vs level 11 variety isn't depth variety is fear of commitment one tricks have an unfair advantage in league and in bed the more games you play with the same champion the more terrifying you become Study the Saskio way

The reason elite chess players have lower IQs is the same reason "successful founders dropped out" is bad advice. Once you select for the top of any field, the traits required to get there become negatively correlated. Elite chess players need both IQ and chess-specific skill. Within them, the lower-IQ players must have higher pure chess skill to compensate, or they wouldn't be elite. The correlation is mechanical. It comes from how you drew the sample. Apply this to founder advice. Among the general population, education and outcomes correlate positively. Among elite founders, dropouts had to compensate with something else: world-class technical skill, family capital, or an exceptional network. The "missing" trait in dropout-founders forced the other traits higher. Copying the dropout move without the compensating trait does nothing. Every refrain from a top performer follows this pattern: "I never networked, I just built great products." Within elite founders, the ones who skipped networking had exceptional products. The constraint selected for them. "I sleep 4 hours a night." Within elite executives, sleep trades against output. In the general population, less sleep correlates with worse cognitive performance. You're hearing the substitution pattern of survivors. "I don't read books." A top 0.01% operator who doesn't read requires compensation somewhere: raw memory, decades of operating reps, or a network that fed them what books would have. The chart is the cleanest version of this you'll ever see. Black dots are the full population, strong positive correlation between early and adult performance. Red dots are the elite subset. Slope near zero. Every advice book lives in the red dots. Every "what makes top performers different" study lives in the red dots. Every Forbes profile lives in the red dots. You're learning the substitution patterns of people who already won. Their path is in the red dots. Yours lives in the black. When someone elite tells you what made them successful, the real question is what they had to be elite at to have the option of skipping the conventional path.

Adesua just uploaded this on her page…. This love too sweet 🥹❤️✨

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

Euh, non... Avec un jeu de 52 cartes, ça donne 8.06*10^67, soit un nombre à 68 chiffres. Avec un jeu de 54 cartes, ça donne 2.3*10^71, soit un nombre à 72 chiffres. Pour un nombre à "80 zéros", il faut un jeu de 59 cartes...