Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Breadman
108.6K posts
Breadman
@BTCBreadMan
Other humans being willing to trade you their bitcoin for your US dollars is transitory. Act accordingly. Mostly shitposts and zero financial advice.
Chicago Katılım Temmuz 2020
850 Takip Edilen16.3K Takipçiler
Breadman retweetledi
Breadman retweetledi
Okay. Took deep breaths. I understand now what is happening here.
I decided I’m ok with this because I love her. But how do I get her to move on from hiding it without coming off as accusatory or mean?
Her penis, that is.
Breadman@BTCBreadMan
I met cute girl in Thailand on a business trip, we hit it off, and we’ve been married 2 years. She gives me great blowjobs almost every day, but she won’t let me go down on her or have sex with her. She’s never even let me see her fully naked. Is this a cultural thing or what?
English
So men just marry before having sex? Bro you married a Lb lol
Breadman@BTCBreadMan
I met cute girl in Thailand on a business trip, we hit it off, and we’ve been married 2 years. She gives me great blowjobs almost every day, but she won’t let me go down on her or have sex with her. She’s never even let me see her fully naked. Is this a cultural thing or what?
English
@TeddyBitcoins I think quite a significant portion of traders and people with money to deploy expect that and are waiting.
English
@BTCBreadMan Yeah mate. They have a cultural thing where they don’t what their husbands to see their cocks. Please respect her position on this.
English
I met cute girl in Thailand on a business trip, we hit it off, and we’ve been married 2 years.
She gives me great blowjobs almost every day, but she won’t let me go down on her or have sex with her. She’s never even let me see her fully naked.
Is this a cultural thing or what?
English
@BTCBreadMan You married a tranny. FYI.
Your "girl" is a MALE.
Thailand is well-known for "man girls".
Congratulations.
English
OFC I'll explain, but long answer.
First point is that mining and hashing security of bitcoin isn't what makes it valuable per se, it makes it ELIGIBLE to function as secure money. There are many minimum requirements to make a new digital token eligible to compete for world money ststus.
Reaching the minimum requirements doesn't make a token money, or give it value.
Value comes from human minds.
Humans choose money they value. They can themselves run a node, and say, "these are my rules, and if my node doesn't register your payment, I do not accepted that I've been paid by you."
The node runners can reject anything a miner does.
If the node runner happens to be in consensus with many others with sufficient "size" to be economically important, then a miner will want to capture that value and hash for them.
The nodes don't depend on the miners, they ATTRACT them.
Conversely, a shitcoin that has the world's greatest hashpower, but not economically important, will not attract node runners to change their monetary rules away from what they currently value.
English
English
Let’s look at facts.
- Miners simply enforce nodes
- 100% of nodes support BIP-110
- Miners always follow incentives
- Miners will ‘flip the bit’ (or risk losing $200,000 per block) the moment mandatory signaling commences
BIP-110 ushers in the glory days of Bitcoin.🧡
English
@btc2ikigai @HarlanCarradine @CatoTheElder17 @1914ad Multi-sig transactions absolutely require large data fields that allow for arbitrary data.
Are you okay with nuking the ability for Bitcoiners to use multi-sig?
English
@BTCBreadMan @HarlanCarradine @CatoTheElder17 @1914ad And all for what? Because some idealistic idiots now claim trying to reject arbitrary data from the chain is somehow CeNsOrShIp? Please. This is protocol design. Simply no large data fields because monetary transactions don't need them. Why resist that clearly beneficial change?
English
@btc2ikigai @HarlanCarradine @CatoTheElder17 @1914ad You’ve been willingly accepting any kind of data for as long as you’ve been running a node.
What changed?
English
@BTCBreadMan @HarlanCarradine @CatoTheElder17 @1914ad It does. I disagree. I will stop if we as a distributed network for money decide to willingly embrace arbitrary data. I will phase out. I am not willing to WILLINGLY accept any kind of data. I'm just not. I don't want to host CSAM (yes, there it is again). PERIOD.
English
Ok but why did the increase in the default OP_Return limit affect anything for you?
If anything , it encouraged those retards to put their garbage in a place where you could just set your own limit lower and easily filter out.
What actually changed that would make you stop running a node?
English
@BTCBreadMan @HarlanCarradine @CatoTheElder17 @1914ad And not even talking about the needless price increase for hardware needed! We need to try to make it affordable for some poor dude in a 3rd world country. And please not the "just run a pruned node story". You can't do jack shit with that. Plus they still need to do the IBD.
English
English
@btc2ikigai @HarlanCarradine @CatoTheElder17 @1914ad Case in point: I’ve been running a node for 5 years despite the fact that anyone could put objectionable material on the blockchain during those 5 years.
English