ApinPulse
306 posts

ApinPulse
@ApinPulse
#1 Meme Coin On #PulseChain and #PulseX 🦍💰🦧No Pre Sale, Liquidity Locked For 369 Years Deflationary, Hard-Capped & Zero Fees! https://t.co/bRYJ5M4YIo

🧵1/3: The PlusX.app Team built and brought an amazing next generation #Defi AMM protocol to Pulsechain.com Let’s start with a bit of #LPX Education, then touch on LPX Price Resetting, and then a thought experiment: LPX.PlusX.app doesn’t hurt the price of a token, it defends it. Each LPX pool begins with a starting price. This is set by the LPX Creator/Manager and is typically the market price of the Fund Token (Token A) at the moment that LPX activates. That price marks the baseline for its active market-making range. If an LPX begins single-sided, it will never execute a sell below its starting price. This is because, when the Fund Token falls beneath that level, LPX has already completed all of its profit cycles, it has fully redeployed its accumulated Anchor Token (Token B) back into Token A, and LPX automatically pauses further trading until the price of Token A rises over the starting price again. If an LPX Pool Manager see’s the price of Token A is trading below the previously set start price, the Manger can lower the starting price so that LPX can reactivate and begin stacking Anchor Token again (to defend against future volatility). Lowing the LPX start price is essentially a maintenance function that keeps the architecture efficient, adaptive, and ready to resume defense at equilibrium. A Manager only needs to lower the starting price if token holders keep selling and those holders push the price under the LPX starting price. LPX accumulates Token B in rallies and spends it defending dips caused by human behavior and/or MEV. Over time, this turns chaotic volatility into a sequence of profitable cycles that favors committed participants. When Token A trades below an LPX’s start or subsequently adjusted price, that sell pressure comes from external extractors: human sellers or MEV/Arb bots, not from LPX itself. LPX has no code path to sell under its baseline. In short: 👉 LPX sells strength, never weakness. 👉 A single-sided LPX never sells below its start or adjusted start price. 👉 Any move lower is caused by external extraction, not the LPX architecture. The thought experiment: what if LPX had run from the very first trade of a token’s life? LPX would have been selling from the very beginning, steadily building reserves. The result would be the same in any market: lower blow-off tops, much higher floors, and smoother structure. In other words, less euphoric spikes, but far less brutal drawdowns, and a sturdier path upward fueled by captured spread rather than external extraction. Bottom line: LPX stabilizes; it doesn’t dump. It keeps value inside the ecosystem, buys only when profitable, grows defensive reserves as price rises, and given time and cycles, seeks to reward the people who choose to market-make the asset they believe in.




I’m very aware of what the average retail investor has been saying about the need for greater transparency in our markets, stronger regulatory oversight and tougher penalties for market manipulation and criminal behavior. My administration will support the Ape retail rebellion and enact aggressive Wall Street reforms. To match action with words, I just invested $24,000 in GameStop from the fees I earned from suing Monsanto for their knowingly poisoning our soil and causing cancer. I love the idea of making Monsanto support $GME and the Apes. We need a free and fair market. Let’s punish predatory short selling to the moon. By the way, I ride with you and I’m not leaving. #ApesNotLeaving #ApesTogetherStrong #GME #AMC @TheRoaringKitty @StockRetail @KatStryker111 @Cancelcloco @BossBlunts1 @LanceKhazei @PeterRHann1 @Human_Augustus











