Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon

2.5K posts

Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon banner
Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon

Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon

@Armageddon94471

I’m everywhere and nowhere at the same time

Katılım Ocak 2024
238 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler
Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon
Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon@Armageddon94471·
@bishalot Yuh. He’s one of the only people seeking Justice for my friend John OKeefe 🙏🏻🫶🏻💙🙏🏻
English
1
0
2
17
Aidan Kearney
Aidan Kearney@DoctorTurtleboy·
I have no idea how to watch the Celtics game. I have peacock and directv. There is no Celtics game on any channels and my peacock account apparently isn’t the right level to watch a fucking playoff basketball game. Anyone have any idea how I can watch this game? I’m a boomer and I give up
English
96
2
154
31K
mabbe8
mabbe8@mabbe_8·
I'm seeing Aidan Kearney bring back 2:27 am, and frankly, he should be embarrassed. That claim, one he pushed for years and years, and used as the cornerstone of the #FKR "movement," has been thoroughly debunked by every digital forensics expert who has reviewed it. There isn't a single digital phone expert who will go on record to say it was a Google search. Notta one! Even Karen's own expert, Richard Green, refused to go on the record for fear of perjury. To be clear... It wasn’t a search. It was a WAL file of a tab session and stored in the BrowserState.db. A WAL file is a temporary system log that users can’t access or delete. More importantly, it was a browser refocus event, not a search. If it were real, it would appear in the History or Knowledge C databases. It doesn’t. Full stop. This should end the discussion, but here we are. You know what's not debatable but gets no traction: the GPS and phone data John O’Keefe’s phone: • Arrives at Fairview ~12:24am • John steps out of the Lexus at 12:31:55 am • John begins to take 36 steps at 12:32 am • Karen’s Lexus Telemetry records high-speed reverse event at 12:32:09 am • John’s phone records his final movement at 12:32:16 • John never moves again until 6:15 am • His phone battery temperature NEVER warms, proving he didn’t enter a warmer environment To believe the “inside the house” theory, you have to believe: the phone stopped tracking movement the moment he entered, recorded no steps inside, showed no temperature fluctuations, and somehow ended up back outside without logging movement during an attack and dog mauling event. That’s not how these systems work. And the data is crystal clear: 2:27 am is a misdirection, John NEVER entered the house, and not one piece of data points to anyone other than #KarenRead. To be honest, this is the weakest narrative, and the fact that it still holds your attention after all these years says more about you at this point than it does about Karen and Aidan.
English
68
17
100
4.7K
Thrilla the Gorilla
Thrilla the Gorilla@ThrillaRilla369·
You're eating out and the bill is $74 - what are you tipping? Be honest, I'm trying to prove a point.
English
11.3K
73
2.8K
2.4M
Nick Rocco
Nick Rocco@Nickyhaircuts·
@Lawferiooo Nothing back fired on me. You think I can stop ppl from talking shit about others? Why didn’t you call Nan out when she was throwing hundreds around to everyone? Oh that’s right because your a coward who can’t use there real name because your a scared little boy.
English
10
3
64
3.4K
Lawferio Parody
Lawferio Parody@Lawferiooo·
You let her continue to spew her hate because you hate TB. Sit the fuck down yourself you useless pos. You let her continue with her vile post's, now it's backfired on you.
Nick Rocco@Nickyhaircuts

@Lawferiooo @Lawferio Oh please. I was the first one to call her out from day one while all of you loved her. Also I talked to Kelly on the phone the past 2 days. Take a seat you clown

English
1
1
42
7.2K
TheOP
TheOP@theymattered25·
@Armageddon94471 Look at this sick fucks Picture, these people Have no boundaries .
TheOP tweet media
English
1
0
12
182
Eric M
Eric M@EricMulhollan12·
@Armageddon94471 @NoteMyObjection Know who is a horrible person? A weirdo who puts a deceased man they didn’t know in their profile photo. That would be you.
English
1
0
6
53
Note My Objection
Note My Objection@NoteMyObjection·
No, she wasn't. First, I would never put someone I care about in a position where they would or could be personally or professionally harmed. Ever. Second, I don't need "sources". I don't report anything- I'm not a reporter, nor a journalist. I don't break news, or seek to report anything that isn't public. I certainly never did on this case. I simply give my legal opinion and analysis. That's it. And while my opinions may be difficult for some to accept, they are nonetheless my opinions. As to Kerry Roberts, I don't need help with guests- she came on my podcast because I messaged her on Facebook and asked if she would be interested. It's not that deep. I know that everyone wants every person who is not aligned with the 'one, true narrative' to someone be an aha, gotcha moment... but it isn't. And please don't act as though it's not done maliciously. You could have just asked me - like you did here, and I would have answered. Instead, you used it for content and didn't care whether there was truth to it or not. Because truth only matters to some of you when it's convenient. And on top of it, you use me for content while you have me blocked. And yes, you blocked me. Not the other way around. So let's be honest about that - two plus years ago, you were posting that you were being stalked in Canton because of your coverage of the case, someone tagged me and asked my opinion. I responded that it did not appear to be stalking as defined by the criminal statute and something to the likes of that I try to stay out of the drama. You spiraled and blocked me. So next time, just be a grown up and ask. And stop using me for views. Be creative on your own two feet.
English
27
11
141
33.6K
BoozeyBeauty
BoozeyBeauty@BoozeyBeauty·
My video about Katherine Loftus (NoteMyObjection) was not an attack, and I said that multiple times throughout it. The entire point was that if you are going to present yourself as an “unapologetically honest” LawTuber, especially now stepping into interviewing witnesses in high profile cases, then transparency is of the most utmost importance to an audience. It’s not optional.. and frankly, it just comes with the territory. When you have a family member working as a victim witness advocate in the DA’s office, and you are interviewing someone who had a very close relationship with others in that office, to the point where he was publicly calling Kerry Roberts and Jen McCabe the “best detectives around,” that is a connection worth acknowledging. Whether she thinks it’s relevant or not doesn’t really matter, because to viewers it absolutely can raise questions about bias. Instead of just addressing it head on or even clarifying it if there was nothing there, she chose to deflect and take a dig at me, which honestly says more than anything I pointed out in the first place. A valid question to ask: Was Molly Loftus (a victim witness advocate in the district attorneys office) ever a source for Katherine? And is this possibly a reason why a witness felt comfortable for an interview with her?
BoozeyBeauty tweet media
English
18
22
344
11.5K
Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon retweetledi
The Reckoning 💥
The Reckoning 💥@sethjlevy·
Barricading the barricade will never not be hilarious.
The Reckoning 💥 tweet media
English
136
545
5.7K
179.2K
Crown_Dreamer_Armageddon retweetledi
Gizmo Memes
Gizmo Memes@GizmoMemes·
Marco Rubio on 4/20 😭
Gizmo Memes tweet media
Polski
314
1.5K
13.8K
667.4K